Skip to main content
Download PDF

Clinical outcomes and safety of anakinra in the treatment of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children: a single center observational study

Pediatric Rheumatology volume 21, Article number: 76 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background and objective

Evidence for the treatment of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is lacking. Anakinra, which targets IL-1-mediated inflammation, is reserved for refractory cases of MIS-C; however, its use in the treatment of MIS-C is not clearly established.

Patients and methods

To examine a role for anakinra in MIS-C, we performed a single center observational cohort study of all MIS-C patients diagnosed at our children’s hospital from May 15 to November 15, 2020. Demographics, clinical features, diagnostic testing, and cardiac function parameters were compared between MIS-C patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) monotherapy and IVIG with anakinra (IVIG + anakinra).

Results

Among 46 patients with confirmed MIS-C, 32 (70%) were in the IVIG + anakinra group, of which 9 (28%) were also given corticosteroids (CS). No patients were treated with anakinra alone. MIS-C patients in the IVIG + anakinra group were enriched in a CV shock phenotype (p = 0.02), and those with CV shock were treated with higher doses of anakinra for a longer duration. Furthermore, MIS-C patients in the IVIG + anakinra group exhibited improvements in fever and cardiac function with or without CS. No significant adverse events were observed, and no differences in IL-1β levels were found among MIS-C patients in the IVIG + anakinra group.

Conclusions

Anakinra treatment, which was co-administered with IVIG primarily in patients with severe MIS-C, was associated with improvements in fever and cardiac function, and demonstrated a favorable side-effect profile. These findings suggest a role for adjunctive anakinra in the treatment of severe MIS-C.

Background

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a clinical entity distinct from primary COVID-19 infection that resembles Kawasaki disease (KD) and toxic shock syndrome (TSS) [1,2,3,4,5]. Some features of MIS-C are highly similar to KD, such as persistent fever, hyperinflammation, multiorgan system involvement that commonly includes cardiovascular (CV) dysfunction and coronary artery abnormalities [6,7,8], and elevated interleukin-1β (IL-1β), as well as IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and interferon-γ [9, 10]. Given the lack of randomized controlled trials to compare therapeutic approaches used to treat MIS-C, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) has published consensus treatment guidelines based on expert review, which recommends intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and corticosteroids (CS) as first-line therapy [11]. Biologic medications such as anakinra, which targets IL-1, have been used for refractory cases of MIS-C due to its effectiveness in similar hyperinflammatory diseases such as KD and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) [12, 13]. IL-1 responses in MIS-C may be elicited by endothelial cell damage from autoantibodies, complement, and immune complexes, lending further support that anakinra may be an effective treatment for MIS-C [2, 11, 14]. Here, we describe the clinical responses and cytokine profiles of a heterogeneous cohort of confirmed MIS-C patients treated with IVIG monotherapy and IVIG with anakinra. Our findings reveal favorable clinical outcomes associated with treatment of MIS-C patients with adjunctive anakinra, suggesting that anakinra may be a safe and efficacious treatment for severe MIS-C.

Methods

Study design, setting, and subjects

This observational clinical cohort study included children as they were hospitalized for MIS-C at our children’s hospital over a 6-month period (May 15 to November 15, 2020). The study received approval by the institutional research board, and a waiver of informed consent was granted. The clinical descriptions, diagnostic testing, and therapies for confirmed MIS-C patients were extracted from the electronic health record as previously described [14].

Treatment algorithm

A multidisciplinary team at our children’s hospital was created to respond quickly to suspected cases of MIS-C through daily meetings and the creation of protocol for the evaluation and treatment of MIS-C as previously described [14]. The protocol was developed and implemented prior to the publication of ACR guidelines for management of MIS-C. All patients who met the CDC case definition for MIS-C were hospitalized and treated with IVIG at 2 g/kg and aspirin as recommended by the ACR guidelines for the management of MIS-C [11]. Using the institutional algorithm, anakinra was initiated at the clinical judgement of the pediatric rheumatologist in conjunction with the hospitalist team and consultants in the following situations: (1) as adjunct immunomodulatory intervention for MIS-C in critically-ill patients admitted to ICU, or (2) as first-line rescue therapy for those refractory to IVIG. Anakinra was chosen for treatment of MIS-C by virtue of its IL-1 targeted mechanism of action, short half-life, and titratable effects [12, 15]. An algorithm for starting doses of anakinra and its up-titration in MIS-C patients was previously reported [14]. Briefly, intravenous anakinra was started at 8-10 mg/kg/day divided every 6 h in critically ill patients and 6-8 mg/kg/day divided every 6 h in non-critically ill patients at the clinical judgement of the consulting pediatric rheumatologist [14]. Weaning of intravenous anakinra was accomplished by reducing the dose by ~ 2 mg/kg/day every 24–48 h in clinically stable patients until discontinued before hospital discharge (Supplemental Figure S1).

Outcome measurements

Echocardiograms (echo) were performed with either Phillips (Andover, MA) or GE (Chicago, IL) vendor machines as previously reported [6, 16]. Conventional echocardiographic measurements were made according to American Society of Echocardiography guidelines, including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by modified Simpson’s biplane method. Normal LVEF was defined as ≥ 55%. Cardiac longitudinal strain (apical four-chamber view, or Ap4) was measured off-line on an independent vendor platform, TomTec. A normal value of -21.4 was extrapolated from adult data and accepted by the American Society of Echocardiography [17]. Recorded temperature from routine vital sign measurements during hospitalization was extracted from the patient charts, and fever defervescence was defined as the first measurement of oral or rectal temperature < 38.0 °C. Adverse events such as neutropenia, rash, elevated liver function tests, hemolytic anemia, anaphylaxis, and re-hospitalization, were extracted from the patient charts and defined according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

Cytokine profiles in MIS-C

To explore a physiologic basis for the clinical outcomes in MIS-C patients who received adjunctive anakinra, cytokine profiles in blood samples collected shortly after admission but prior to treatment with anakinra were analyzed. Due to limited data from patients who received IVIG + anakinra with CS, analysis of cytokine profiles according to clinical phenotype was made between patients selected to receive IVIG monotherapy or IVIG + anakinra treatment.

Statistical analyses

Continuous data were summarized using descriptive statistics of medians with 25th and 75th percentiles. Categorical variables were described as percentages and analyzed by Fisher’s exact test. Normal ranges for laboratory tests performed at our institution were compiled in Supplemental Table S1. No imputations were made for missing data (Supplemental Figure S2). Non-parametric Mann Whitney test was used when comparing continuous measures between patients with/without KD-like features, CV shock, and anakinra treatment. Paired longitudinal echocardiographic measurements were analyzed with a Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test. Statistical analysis of defervescence after treatment initiation for MIS-C was calculated with log rank test. For all analyses, a non-adjusted p-value < 0.05 was considered significant given the exploratory nature of the study. The data analysis plan was discussed with biostatisticians at our children’s hospital. All analyses were performed with Prism 9 software, and Adobe Illustrator 2022 was used for graphical representations of the data.

Results

Patient demographics

During the study period, 46 patients who satisfied the 2020 CDC MIS-C surveillance case definition and whose final diagnoses were confirmed by our MIS-C Task Force were identified and further categorized by the presence/absence of KD-like features, as defined by the American Heart Association [13], and CV shock, which was defined as persistent fluid-refractory hypotension requiring vasoactive support as previously reported [14]. MIS-C patients without KD-like features and CV shock were termed non-specific [18], while those with both KD-like features and CV shock were termed Kawasaki disease shock syndrome-like (KDSS-like).

Of the 46 patients in the study, 14 (30%) received IVIG monotherapy. The remaining 32 (70%) patients received IVIG and anakinra (referred to as IVIG + anakinra), and these patients were further subdivided into those given CS (with CS), which included stress hydrocortisone (19%) and inflammatory steroid (9%), and those who were not given CS (without CS) (72%) (Table 1). The median age at diagnosis was 8 [4 − 13] years, and 54% were male (Table 1). CV shock was present in 65% of MIS-C patients in the IVIG + anakinra group (vs. 21% in the IVIG monotherapy group, p = 0.02) (Table 1). 34% of MIS-C patients in the IVIG + anakinra group presented with KDSS (vs. 7% in the IVIG monotherapy group, p = 0.07) (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison of MIS-C patients in the IVIG monotherapy versus IVIG + anakinra groups
Full size table

Characteristics of MIS-C patients who received IVIG+anakinra

The median dose of anakinra in the IVIG + anakinra group was 7.9 [7.5–8.2] mg/kg/day, with a median maximum dose of 9.5 [7.7–10.0] mg/kg/day, and a median duration of 9.8 [7.0–11.3] days (Supplemental Table S3). 100% (20/20) of patients with CV shock were given anakinra as adjunctive immunosuppression, and 100% (12/12) of patients without CV shock received anakinra as rescue therapy (Table 2). Among all MIS-C patients in the IVIG + anakinra group, those with CV shock presented with high median troponin (0.05 vs. 0.02 ng/mL without CV shock; normal < 0.04 ng/mL, p = 0.03) and BNP (3339 vs. 1472 pg/mL without CV shock; normal < 1157 pg/mL, p = 0.04) (Supplemental Table S4). Patients with CV shock received doses of anakinra at 9.8 mg/kg/day (vs. 8.0 mg/kg/day without CV shock, p = 0.003) for a treatment duration of 10.6 days (vs. 7.1 days without CV shock, p = 0.002) (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of MIS-C patients in the IVIG + anakinra group presenting with or without CV shock
Full size table

Resolution of fever in MIS-C patients

Resolution of fever occurred in 100% of MIS-C patients receiving IVIG monotherapy by 5 days after admission, compared to patients in the IVIG + anakinra group, with ~ 50% defervescence occurring by 5 days after admission (p = 0.003) (Fig. 1A and B). Stress or inflammatory dose CS were used in 9 patients (28%) in the IVIG + anakinra group, and no significant differences in fever resolution were observed between MIS-C patients with CS and without CS (p = 0.64) (Fig. 1B). Subgroup analysis revealed that among patients with KD-like or KDSS-like features in the IVIG + anakinra group, complete defervescence occurred by 7 days after anakinra treatment was initiated (Supplemental Fig. 2 C and 2E).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Clinical outcomes associated with treatment of MIS-C patients

Effects of anakinra on fever and cardiac function in MIS-C patients. Fever in patients given IVIG monotherapy or IVIG + anakinra starting from admission (A) and in IVIG + anakinra patients treated with or without CS (B) are shown. LVEF (C) and cardiac strain (D) are shown among the treatment groups. Dotted lines denote the cut-off ranges for normal LVEF (55%) and cardiac strain (-21.4). Data were analyzed by log rank test (A and B) or non-parametric two-tailed Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test (C and D), and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

Full size image

Longitudinal cardiac function measurements in MIS-C patients

The median time between initial and follow-up echo after treatment initiation was 11 [9–14] days (Supplemental Figure S3B). No patients in the IVIG monotherapy group exhibited a reduced LVEF < 55% in their initial echo, although a statistically significant increase in LVEF was measured in the follow-up compared to the initial echo (62% vs. 65%, p = 0.01) (Fig. 1C). 10 patients (37%) in the IVIG + anakinra group exhibited reduced LVEF (< 55%) at baseline. LVEF in these patients increased in the follow-up echo after treatment (59.0% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.004) (Fig. 1C). MIS-C patients who received CS in addition to IVIG + anakinra exhibited an increase in LVEF from initial to follow-up (51 to 57%, p = 0.04) (Fig. 1C). Analysis of cardiac strain by Ap4 in MIS-C patients in the IVIG + anakinra group improved in follow-up compared to the initial echo (-13.2 to -17.8, p = 0.04). No improvements were seen in the IVIG monotherapy (-15.5 to -18.9, p = 0.21) or IVIG + anakinra with CS groups (-14.6 to -16.1, p = 0.55) (Fig. 1D). MIS-C patients in the IVIG + anakinra group with CV shock and KDSS-like features exhibited improvements in LVEF on follow-up compared to initial echo (49 to 59% for CV shock, p = 0.005; 49 to 59% for KDSS-like, p = 0.047) (Supplemental Figure S2G). MIS-C patients in the IVIG + anakinra group with KD-like features also had improved Ap4 cardiac strain on follow-up compared to initial echo (-14.4 to -18.4, p = 0.005) (Supplemental Figure S2I).

Adverse events

No mortality or thrombosis events were observed in the entire cohort of MIS-C patients (0/46 or 0%). Patients in the IVIG + anakinra group had increased percentages of neutropenia (20% vs. 7% in IVIG monotherapy, p = 0.25) and elevated liver function tests (LFTs) (24% vs. 14% in IVIG monotherapy, p = 0.25) (Table 3). No significant differences in hemolytic anemia, anaphylaxis, or re-hospitalization were found between MIS-C patients in the IVIG monotherapy and IVIG + anakinra without CS groups (Table 3). Patients who received IVIG + anakinra with CS had a higher incidence of elevated LFTs (Table 3), but the degree of elevation was mild in most of the patients (CTCAE grade < 2) (Supplemental Table S5).

Table 3 Adverse events associated with IVIG + anakinra treatment in MIS-C patients
Full size table

Comparison of cytokine profiles in MIS-C patients in the IVIG monotherapy and IVIG + anakinra groups

Due to limited data from patients who received IVIG + anakinra with CS, analysis of cytokine profiles was limited to patients selected to receive IVIG monotherapy or IVIG + anakinra. No significant differences in circulating levels of IL-1β in the cohort of MIS-C patients were found (p = 0.37) (Table 4). Patients in the IVIG + anakinra group had elevated circulating levels of pro-inflammatory markers including sIL-2R (5.7 vs. 1.4 fold difference, p = 0.0006), IL-6 (22.1 vs. 3.0 fold difference in IVIG monotherapy, p = 0.006), and IL-8 (1.0 vs. 0.3 fold difference in IVIG monotherapy, p = 0.03) (Table 4).

Table 4 Comparison of circulating cytokines in MIS-C patients
Full size table

Discussion

The short-term outcomes of MIS-C patients treated with IVIG + anakinra were favorable

The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) MIS-C Task Force treatment recommendations vary based on disease severity, ranging from no treatment for mild disease, IVIG and steroid for moderate and severe disease, and anakinra for signs of MAS [11]. In keeping with these recommendations, anakinra was used as adjunctive therapy in place of CS in patients with severe or refractory MIS-C in this study. This allowed for a clearer observation of anakinra’s effect on MIS-C without the confounding effects of CS.

In this cohort, MIS-C patients treated with IVIG + anakinra had improved fever and cardiac function (Fig. 1). In the relatively short follow-up period, improvements in LVEF were seen in MIS-C patients treated with IVIG + anakinra, both with and without CS, supporting the rapid and significant impact of anakinra on severe MIS-C. The smaller improvement in cardiac strain seen in MIS-C is consistent with prior observations that LVEF normalizes more quickly than other measures of cardiac function, such as cardiac strain [16]. These findings are similar to treatment responses reported for patients with MIS-C who received CS monotherapy or IVIG with CS [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Numerous studies have reported effective defervescence and normalization of LVEF in MIS-C patients who received anakinra [26,27,28]; however, the contribution of anakinra in these reports is difficult to assess due to concurrent CS use in most of the patients. Given the observational nature of this cohort study, variability in disease severity between the treatment groups, and the lack of a comparator group that received CS without anakinra, we are unable to make a direct comparison of disease outcomes between anakinra and CS. However, MIS-C patients who received CS in addition to IVIG + anakinra exhibited similar clinical responses as measured by fever resolution and cardiac function when compared to those who received IVIG + anakinra only without CS (Fig. 1B and G). Overall, these findings suggest that anakinra is an effective adjunctive treatment for patients with severe manifestations of MIS-C, such as CV shock. However, more rigorous evaluation through clinical trials are needed to determine whether IVIG + anakinra is superior to IVIG with CS.

Analysis of adverse reactions between patients in the IVIG monotherapy and IVIG + anakinra groups revealed a number of key observations. MIS-C patients treated according to our hospital’s treatment algorithm had no thromboses or deaths, which have been reported in earlier MIS-C cohorts receiving IVIG with or without CS (Table 3) [19, 20, 23]. The patients who received CS with IVIG + anakinra exhibited only mild elevations in LFTs when compared to those who received IVIG monotherapy (Supplemental Table 5). MIS-C patients in our cohort were hospitalized for a median of 11 [9–14] days (Table 2) and were discharged only after weaning off all immunomodulatory agents. It is difficult to compare hospital length-of-stay between patients receiving IVIG monotherapy and IVIG + anakinra since MIS-C patients with more severe disease were selected to receive anakinra, which likely contributed to longer hospitalization. However, it is notable that no patients treated with anakinra were re-admitted for recurrence of MIS-C symptoms after discharge, as previously reported in patients treated with IVIG and CS [29]. Taken together, these findings suggest that anakinra is a potentially safe and effective treatment for MIS-C, although further studies are needed to compare the overall clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of anakinra treatment compared to CS and other biologics. Lastly, while the cases of MIS-C worldwide have declined [30], possibly from vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 and differences in clinical severity by COVID-19 variants [31, 32], the results of this study regarding the safety and efficacy of intravenous anakinra in the context of MIS-C can potentially be extended to other hyperinflammatory rheumatologic conditions, such as systemic JIA and MAS.

The use of anakinra for treatment of MIS-C suggests a role for IL-1-mediated inflammatory pathways

Defervescence associated with anakinra treatment suggested that IL-1 plays a role in the pathophysiology of MIS-C. Interestingly, in contrast to IL-6 which was significantly elevated in this cohort, no elevation in serum IL-1β levels was seen (Table 4). The lack of elevated serum IL-1β in patients with MIS-C is consistent with other reports [33, 34]. While serum IL-1β is repeatedly normal in MIS-C, IL-1β gene expression has been previously shown to be higher in MIS-C compared to KD [35], suggesting IL-1β may exist in a bound state on the surface of immune cells or act locally within tissue to modulate inflammatory responses in MIS-C [36].

Limitations of study

The observational clinical design of this study prevented direct comparison of different treatments. The use of an institutional algorithm introduced a selection bias for patients with more severe features of MIS-C to receive anakinra, and the decision to initiate anakinra in MIS-C patients was based on the clinical impression of the in-patient team and not on objective lab tests. Analysis of data from a small cohort of patients from a single academic institution was counterbalanced by the granularity of data in a clearly defined and systematically treated population of patients with MIS-C. Our study may have been underpowered to detect differences in side-effect profiles of anakinra. Lastly, this study included patients and data limited to MIS-C diagnosed during the first wave of SARS-CoV2 in Washington DC, during which Alpha was the predominant variant, and may not represent MIS-C caused by other SARS-CoV2 variants, such as Delta and Omicron.

Conclusions

The addition of anakinra to IVIG for treatment of the multiple clinical phenotypes of MIS-C was associated with favorable outcomes, including fever resolution and cardiac function with minimal adverse effects.

Data Availability

Deidentified individual participant data are not publicly available due to ongoing collection and analysis but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

MIS-C:

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children

IVIG:

Intravenous immunoglobulin

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

KD:

Kawasaki disease

CV:

Cardiovascular

TSS:

Toxic shock syndrome

KDSS:

Kawasaki disease shock syndrome

MAS:

Macrophage activation syndrome

ACR:

American College of Rheumatology

Ap4:

Apical four-chamber view

ALC:

Absolute lymphocyte count

CS:

Corticosteroids

References

  1. Cheung EW, Zachariah P, Gorelik M, Boneparth A, Kernie SG, Orange JS, et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome related to COVID-19 in previously healthy children and adolescents in New York City. JAMA. 2020;324(3):294–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Diorio C, Henrickson SE, Vella LA, McNerney KO, Chase J, Burudpakdee C, et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children and COVID-19 are distinct presentations of SARS-CoV-2. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(11):5967–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Riphagen S, Gomez X, Gonzalez-Martinez C, Wilkinson N, Theocharis P. Hyperinflammatory shock in children during COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2020;395(10237):1607–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Toubiana J, Poirault C, Corsia A, Bajolle F, Fourgeaud J, Angoulvant F, et al. Kawasaki-like multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children during the covid-19 pandemic in Paris, France: prospective observational study. BMJ. 2020;369:m2094.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Verdoni L, Mazza A, Gervasoni A, Martelli L, Ruggeri M, Ciuffreda M, et al. An outbreak of severe Kawasaki-like disease at the italian epicentre of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic: an observational cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10239):1771–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Harahsheh AS, Krishnan A, DeBiasi RL, Olivieri LJ, Spurney C, Donofrio MT et al. Cardiac echocardiogram findings of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2-associated multi-system inflammatory syndrome in children. Cardiol Young. 2021:1–9.

  7. Loke YH, Berul CI, Harahsheh AS. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children: is there a linkage to Kawasaki disease? Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2020;30(7):389–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsubara D, Chang J, Kauffman HL, Wang Y, Nadaraj S, Patel C, et al. Longitudinal Assessment of Cardiac Outcomes of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children Associated with COVID-19 infections. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(3):e023251.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Carter MJ, Fish M, Jennings A, Doores KJ, Wellman P, Seow J, et al. Peripheral immunophenotypes in children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Med. 2020;26(11):1701–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Henderson LA, Yeung RSM. MIS-C: early lessons from immune profiling. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021;17(2):75–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Henderson LA, Canna SW, Friedman KG, Gorelik M, Lapidus SK, Bassiri H et al. American College of Rheumatology Clinical Guidance for Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children Associated with SARS-CoV-2 and Hyperinflammation in Pediatric COVID-19: Version 3. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022.

  12. Maniscalco V, Abu-Rumeileh S, Mastrolia MV, Marrani E, Maccora I, Pagnini I, et al. The off-label use of anakinra in pediatric systemic autoinflammatory diseases. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2020;12:1759720X20959575.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. McCrindle BW, Rowley AH, Newburger JW, Burns JC, Bolger AF, Gewitz M, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management of Kawasaki Disease: A Scientific Statement for Health Professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(17):e927–e99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. DeBiasi RL, Harahsheh AS, Srinivasalu H, Krishnan A, Sharron MP, Parikh K et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome of children: subphenotypes, risk factors, biomarkers, cytokine profiles, and viral sequencing. J Pediatr. 2021;237:125 – 35 e18.

  15. Phadke O, Rouster-Stevens K, Giannopoulos H, Chandrakasan S, Prahalad S. Intravenous administration of anakinra in children with macrophage activation syndrome. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2021;19(1):98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Basu S, Kim EJ, Sharron MP, Austin A, Pollack MM, Harahsheh AS et al. Strain Echocardiography and Myocardial Dysfunction in critically Ill Children with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome unrecognized by Conventional Echocardiography: a retrospective cohort analysis. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021.

  17. Farsalinos KE, Daraban AM, Unlu S, Thomas JD, Badano LP, Voigt JU. Head-to-Head comparison of global longitudinal strain measurements among nine different vendors: the EACVI/ASE Inter-Vendor Comparison Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(10):1171–81. e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Whittaker E, Bamford A, Kenny J, Kaforou M, Jones CE, Shah P, et al. Clinical characteristics of 58 children with a Pediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome temporally Associated with SARS-CoV-2. JAMA. 2020;324(3):259–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Garcia-Salido A, de Carlos Vicente JC, Belda Hofheinz S, Balcells Ramirez J, Slocker Barrio M, Leoz Gordillo I, et al. Severe manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adolescents: from COVID-19 pneumonia to multisystem inflammatory syndrome: a multicentre study in pediatric intensive care units in Spain. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):666.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lima-Setta F, Magalhaes-Barbosa MC, Rodrigues-Santos G, Figueiredo E, Jacques ML, Zeitel RS, et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Brazil: a multicenter, prospective cohort study. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2021;97(3):354–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McArdle AJ, Vito O, Patel H, Seaby EG, Shah P, Wilson C, et al. Treatment of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(1):11–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ouldali N, Toubiana J, Antona D, Javouhey E, Madhi F, Lorrot M, et al. Association of intravenous immunoglobulins plus methylprednisolone vs immunoglobulins alone with course of Fever in Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children. JAMA. 2021;325(9):855–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramcharan T, Nolan O, Lai CY, Prabhu N, Krishnamurthy R, Richter AG, et al. Paediatric inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome: temporally Associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS): Cardiac features, management and short-term outcomes at a UK Tertiary Paediatric Hospital. Pediatr Cardiol. 2020;41(7):1391–401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Son MBF, Murray N, Friedman K, Young CC, Newhams MM, Feldstein LR, et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children - initial therapy and outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(1):23–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Villacis-Nunez DS, Jones K, Jabbar A, Fan L, Moore W, Peter AS, et al. Short-term outcomes of corticosteroid monotherapy in Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children. JAMA Pediatr. 2022;176(6):576–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chang JC, Young CC, Muscal E, Sexson Tejtel SK, Newhams MM, Kucukak S et al. Variation in early Anakinra Use and short-term outcomes in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023.

  27. Mastrolia MV, Marrani E, Calabri GB, L’Erario M, Maccora I, Favilli S, et al. Fast recovery of cardiac function in PIMS-TS patients early using intravenous anti-IL-1 treatment. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Mastrolia MV, Marrani E, Maccora I, Pagnini I, Simonini G. The role of Anti-IL-1 treatment in MIS-C patients. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2022;22(1):1–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Clemente V, Tripiciano C, Moras P, Deriu D, Di Giuseppe M, Piscitelli AL, et al. Post-discharge telephonic follow-up of pediatric patients affected by SARS-CoV2 infection in a single Italianpediatric COVID center: a safe and feasible way to monitor children after hospitalization. Ital J Pediatr. 2021;47(1):119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID Data Tracker. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC. March 2023. p. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker.

  31. Whittaker R, Greve-Isdahl M, Boas H, Suren P, Buanes EA, Veneti L. COVID-19 hospitalization among children < 18 years by variant Wave in Norway. Pediatrics. 2022;150(3).

  32. Holm M, Espenhain L, Glenthoj J, Schmidt LS, Nordly SB, Hartling UB, et al. Risk and phenotype of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Vaccinated and unvaccinated danish children before and during the Omicron Wave. JAMA Pediatr. 2022;176(8):821–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Gurlevik SL, Ozsurekci Y, Sag E, Derin Oygar P, Kesici S, Akca UK et al. The difference of the inflammatory milieu in MIS-C and severe COVID-19. Pediatr Res. 2022.

  34. Syrimi E, Fennell E, Richter A, Vrljicak P, Stark R, Ott S, et al. The immune landscape of SARS-CoV-2-associated Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) from acute disease to recovery. iScience. 2021;24(11):103215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ghosh P, Katkar GD, Shimizu C, Kim J, Khandelwal S, Tremoulet AH, et al. An Artificial Intelligence-guided signature reveals the shared host immune response in MIS-C and Kawasaki disease. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):2687.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Gabay C, Lamacchia C, Palmer G. IL-1 pathways in inflammation and human diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6(4):232–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the MIS-C Taskforce for their expertise in creation and implementation of the diagnostic and treatment algorithm; William Suslovic, Emily Ansusinha, and Sara Litt from Children’s National Hospital for help with data extraction; and James Bost, PhD (Division of Biostatistics and Study Methodology, Clinical and Translational Science Institute at Children’s National Hospital) for advice on statistical analysis.

Funding

This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program (IRP) of the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIAMS). The funder did not participate in the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Rheumatology, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA

    Brian L.P. Dizon, Christopher Redmond, Emily C. Gotschlich, Sangeeta Sule, Tova Ronis, Kathleen M. Vazzana, Matthew A. Sherman, Rachael Connor, Abigail Bosk & Hemalatha Srinivasalu

  2. Rheumatology Fellowship and Training Branch, The National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Brian L.P. Dizon & Christopher Redmond

  3. Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA

    Sangeeta Sule, Tova Ronis, Abigail Bosk, Niti Dham, Ashraf S. Harahsheh, Elizabeth Wells, Roberta DeBiasi & Hemalatha Srinivasalu

  4. Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children, Orlando, FL, USA

    Kathleen M. Vazzana

  5. Division of Cardiology, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA

    Niti Dham & Ashraf S. Harahsheh

  6. Division of Neurology, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA

    Elizabeth Wells

  7. Division of Infectious Diseases, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA

    Roberta DeBiasi

Authors
  1. Brian L.P. Dizon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher Redmond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Emily C. Gotschlich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sangeeta Sule
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tova Ronis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kathleen M. Vazzana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Matthew A. Sherman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Rachael Connor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Abigail Bosk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Niti Dham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ashraf S. Harahsheh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Elizabeth Wells
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Roberta DeBiasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Hemalatha Srinivasalu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

BLPD conceptualized and designed the study; acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the data; drafted the manuscript; critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content; and performed the statistical analyses of the data. CR acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the data; drafted the manuscript; critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content; and performed the statistical analyses of the data. ECG acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the data; drafted the manuscript; and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. SS acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the data; critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content; and provided administrative, technical, or material support. TR acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the data; and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. KMV acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the data; and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. MAS acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the data; and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. RC acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the data. AB acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the data. ND acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the data; and provided administrative, technical, or material support. ASH acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the data; critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content; and provided administrative, technical, or material support. EW acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the data; critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content; and provided administrative, technical, or material support. RD acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the data; and provided administrative, technical, or material support. HS conceptualized and designed the study, acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the data; drafted the manuscript; critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content; performed the statistical analyses of the data; provided administrative, technical, or material support; and supervised the study. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hemalatha Srinivasalu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the IRB of Children’s National Hospital System, Washington DC (00014925). Because this was an exempt certified study, participant consent and assent were waived.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dizon, B.L., Redmond, C., Gotschlich, E.C. et al. Clinical outcomes and safety of anakinra in the treatment of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children: a single center observational study. Pediatr Rheumatol 21, 76 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-023-00858-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-023-00858-z

Keywords

Pediatric Rheumatology

ISSN: 1546-0096