Skip to main content
Download PDF

Developmentally appropriate transitional care during the Covid-19 pandemic for young people with juvenile-onset rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: the rationale for a position statement

Pediatric Rheumatology volume 19, Article number: 136 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The importance of developmentally appropriate transitional care in young people with juvenile-onset rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease is well recognised. The Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PReS) / European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Taskforce has developed international recommendations and standards for transitional care and a growing evidence base supports the positive benefits of such care. However, there is also evidence that universal implementation has yet to be realised. In 2020, against this background the COVID-19 pandemic arrived with significant impact on all our lives, young and old, patient, public and professional alike. The unfortunate reality of the pandemic with potential for unfavourable outcomes on healthcare provision during transition was acknowledged by the PReS working groups in a position statement to support healthcare professionals, young people and their caregivers.

Aim

The aim of this review is to present the literature which provides the rationale for the recommendations in the PReS Position Statement.

Summary

The following areas are specifically addressed: the prime importance of care coordination; the impact of the pandemic on the various aspects of the transition process; the importance of ensuring continuity of medication supply; the pros and cons of telemedicine with young people; ensuring meaningful involvement of young people in service development and the importance of core adolescent health practices such as routine developmental assessment psychosocial screening and appropriate parental involvement during transitional care.

Introduction

Health transition is a triphasic process for young people (10–24 year olds). The first phase starts in early adolescence with a lengthy stage of preparation. This is followed by the second stage - the event of transfer, usually in late adolescence. The third phase following transfer is of variable length as young people gradually engage with the new adult service [1]. Effective implementation of health care during this time requires engagement from both paediatric and adult services with young people and their families / caregivers. Transitional care should prepare and support young people and their families / caregivers throughout this 10–15 year period to ensure optimal experience. Health transition addresses psychosocial, social, educational and vocational aspects of care in addition to the physical and medical issues relating to their underlying condition [1,2,3]. Promotion of the confidence of individual young people in managing their health condition has been reported to be associated with better transitional care outcomes [4]. Rheumatology services should therefore both support and nurture the development of health literacy and self-management skills to enable young people to gain such confidence. This takes time. Stollon et al. reported that half of health transition skills were acquired after the age of 18 years [5]. Throughout the transition process, healthcare provided should be developmentally appropriate [6]. Various toolkits are available to support work in this area [7, 8].

EULAR/PReS has provided professionals with standards and recommendations for the transitional care of young people with juvenile-onset Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (jRMDs) [2]. Alongside such guidance, the evidence base to support transitional care has continued to grow [3] since the first objective evaluation of transitional care in juvenile idiopathic arthritis reporting positive outcomes over a decade ago [9]. However, the challenges of implementation remain. A Single Hub and Access point for Paediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) survey reported insufficient transition management planning [10]. A survey of adult rheumatologists in the USA reported significant unmet needs [11] and reports of country specific challenges further highlight the importance of considering the health systems within which rheumatology services are delivered and within which young people and their families have to learn to navigate [12].

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on young people

Although less at risk of the serious complications of the virus [13], the pandemic has had major impact on the psychological, social and vocational development of young people [14,15,16,17,18].

Social development is core to adolescence and social distancing strategies have had a major impact on peer/social support systems [14]. Social distancing has also contributed to anxiety and uncertainty [15] Young people may be stressed by the fear of exposure and submit themselves to self-quarantine even when not necessary. Some young people may also not have the emotional nor psychosocial resources to cope with the enormity of changes in daily life which the Covid-19 pandemic has brought [15,16,17].

In particular, school closure, social distancing and anxiety over health and threats to family employment/income have increased the risks of social isolation, emotional distress and/or mental ill health for young people [16, 17]. Finally, a significant number of the global population of young people are excluded from remote access to health and education due to lack of internet access, low levels of digital literacy or poverty [19]. Other challenges include, but are not limited to, learning disability, auditory or visual needs or language barriers.

Impact of pandemic on health care

The impact of the pandemic on health services has been enormous [20,21,22,23,24]. From the young person and family perspective there is anxiety of coming into a hospital where there are covid infected patients although this is less so in paediatric hospital settings. Physical distancing requirements have led to less frequent face-to-face appointments and delay of investigations. There has been a move towards remote clinics, which brings additional challenges for YP, their families and health care providers. Furthermore, whereas young people can still be accompanied in hospital whether in face-to-face clinics or as inpatients in paediatric settings, they may not be able to be accompanied in adult clinics and wards.

The wearing of masks makes non-verbal communication (such as providing reassuring smiles) to the anxious young person as well as making it more challenging to hear the less articulate, quiet and/or reticent teenager.

Background to the PReS position statement

Concern regarding the impact of change in healthcare services due to Covid-19, particularly affecting transition and transfer to adult services, was raised by the parent representative of the Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM) PReS Working Group and discussed within a JDM working party core group meeting. A decision was made to write an evidence-informed position statement to highlight this issue and help address the needs of young people with JDM transitioning to adult services during the Covid pandemic. A draft position statement was written (LMcC) and ratified by the core group of the JDM working party. When presented at the PReS JDM working party meeting during the PReS Conference (September 2020) there was a request from other Working Parties to make the transition statement generic for jRMDs. With the help of experts in adolescent and young adult (AYA) health [JMcD, RT, HF] and the JDM working party parent representative (JS) the draft statement was further modified. The refined position statement was submitted for review to the PReS Clinical Affairs group and Working Party Chairs. Following minor changes and approval by the PReS Council and Executive, the position statement was published on the PReS website [25].

The aim of the position statement was to define best practice during transition and transfer to adult care for AYA with jRMDs, and address the challenges of the necessary switch to less face-to-face and more remote contacts with YP and their families.

PReS position statement

The position statement details 6 recommendations and signposts to useful resources (see Table 1).

Table 1 PRES Position Statement for transitional care during the covid-19 pandemic for young people with juvenile onset rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases - abbreviated [25]
Full size table

These recommendations will be discussed further in detail below.

Importance of coordination

Coordination is vital at every stage of transition - from early adolescence to young adulthood following transfer to adult hood and clearly stated in guidance to date [25, 26]. The pandemic has potentially impacted on this aspect of transitional care due to the impact on health service delivery [20,21,22,23,24] in addition to the impact on the vocational and social care agencies with whom health care teams need to coordinate care with, namely schools/colleges/universities and organisations providing social support for young people, so many of which closed during lock down. For example, one of the proposed beneficial features associated with positive transitional care outcomes is meeting with the adult team prior to transfer [26]. In an international Delphi study a trusting relationship with the adult care provider was felt to be essential and very important for successful transition by 86% of participants [27]. However, even before the pandemic, this can be a challenge in view of coordinating appointments when the adult rheumatologist can be physically present. For some adult rheumatology professionals it is impossible in view of geographical distance. An opportunity of the pandemic is the exponential growth of the use of video consultations when face-to-face consultations are not possible. Virtual consultations enable attendance of members from both paediatric and adult rheumatology team as well as other professionals in the context of multisystem diseases such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) thereby facilitating coordination of care particularly in the peri-transfer period.

There are various models of such “combined clinics” and evidence is still limited as to which model is best. It is important to note that some authors have reported limitations of such clinics [28]. Irrespective of model, it remains important that these clinics remain developmentally appropriate whether face-to-face or virtual e.g. is there time for the young person to be seen independently of the caregivers? How is privacy and confidentiality assured? Even prior to the pandemic, Jensen et al. reported that half of young people (16–23 year olds) were not seeing health professionals independently for at least part of the visit [29].

.

There is evidence to support the concept of a young adult clinic for 16–25 year olds as having better outcomes than the more traditional combined clinic with adult and paediatric rheumatology teams in the same consultation [30]. Reduced morbidity in young people with renal disease has similarly been reported with such models [31]. Young Adult Clinics also provide continuity at a time of many other transitions whether that be educational, living independently, entry into the workforce and furthermore acknowledges that transition continues after transfer. Research into this third phase is limited with only 14 of 71 studies in a systematic review focused on this phase [32]. The implementation of young adult clinics is both developmentally appropriate as well as enabling further research involving this age group.

Importance of a multidisciplinary team (MDT)

As well as impacting the health care provision for young people, the pandemic has also affected multidisciplinary team working with social distancing restrictions limiting face-to-face meetings and the number of professionals physically present in clinic.

Successful engagement of YP in transitional care requires a team-based approach [33]. Team climate is used to describe shared perceptions of organisational policies and includes vision, commitment to excellence and innovation [34]. Change in the team climate has been reported to predict the quality of transitional care delivery [35] and therefore re-deployment and staff illness during the pandemic may have negatively affected the team climate accordingly. Attention is therefore required for teams to reflect on how the pandemic has impacted team working and address any negative impacts. One of the EULAR recommendations [2] is to have a written, agreed and regularly updated transition policy. A review of such written policies is recommended in the light of COVID restrictions. However, it should be noted that such written policies are not yet universal with only 27% of European paediatric centres reporting using them [36].

Ensuring continuity of medication supply

Even in the absence of a pandemic, the transfer to adult services can be a vulnerable time for adherence particularly when young people have to start paying for their prescriptions as happens in some parts of the UK. Learning how to take responsibility for their own medication including the organisation of repeat prescriptions (“refills“) are core transitional readiness skills for all young people. The pandemic significantly impacted accessibility to family doctors and pharmacy services which potentially hindered such skills training although those services offering online ordering of repeat prescriptions were more enabling of young people for the acquisition of such skills. Learning to navigate the health service including pharmacy related aspects of self-care during the ever changing landscape during the pandemic was a particular challenging aspect of transitional care for young people and the health professionals teaching them alike.

Adherence has warranted particular attention during the pandemic as young people in remission may feel they don’t want to risk infection due to immunosuppression and therefore decide on their own volition to stop their biologic or Disease-Modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). It is important to revisit understanding of the benefits and risks of medication and the need to avoid unplanned admissions due to uncontrolled disease. For some in the peritransfer period, this would have meant their first ever admission to an adult ward where visiting of caregivers was severely restricted. High dose steroid rescue therapy for uncontrolled disease was often associated with a period of shielding with all the implications to social and vocational development and adolescent mental health [refs]. Finally this is particularly important in the light of recent reports of uncontrolled disease being a risk factor for COVID − 19 mortality in adults with rheumatic diseases [37]. Although this risk has not been not reported in adolescents, high dose steroid rescue therapy for uncontrolled disease was often associated with a period of shielding with the morbidity associated with the impact of this on social and vocational development and adolescent mental health [16].

Expansion of formal telemedicine protocols

Adolescence is a time when young people start learning the skills to manage their own health, including talking with health professionals. This can be challenging enough for some in face-to-face consultations never mind virtual consultations particularly if the patient-professional relationship is not yet well established. Therefore, a face-to-face consultation, with the appropriate social distancing, personal protective equipment and hygiene control, may be preferable for young people whether they be new to a paediatric setting or transferring to a new team in adult services.

The pandemic has brought opportunities particularly with regards to the use of digital technologies in healthcare. Technology can be used to an advantage in this age group as factors that make technology use attractive are amplified in adolescence. Indeed, adolescents interact with technology more than any other age group [38]. Surveys indicate that young people view technology as having a positive or neutral effect on their social and emotional well-being [38].

One of the predictors of positive outcomes of transitional care has been reported to meeting the adult provider prior to transfer [4]. Prior to the pandemic, this was often considered to be impractical for many young people particularly if the adult service was geographcially distant. The expansion of telemedicine protocols however has enabled this to happen with joint virtual meetings with young people, their parent/caregiver, and both paediatric and adult team members for which toolkits are now available [39]. When access to telemedicine is limited, joint conference calls is another useful approach.

There is growing evidence that telemedicine is feasible for providing care to youth for a variety of health concerns [40], including group work [41]. However ‘one size does not fit all’ and although YP may view technology positively, this may not be true with respect to use in their education nor health care. Steps should be taken to ensure confidentiality is maintained such as ensuring the young person is in a private location if available, and /or use of chat function or headsets as needed [42]. Professionals should also not assume that all YP prefer digital communication. Development of body image is integral to adolescent development and may impact on use of videos in virtual consultation. This may be another reason for YP preferring either face to face or phone consultations. Scheduling of such consultations can be challenging too. For example, if a virtual appointment is during school/college hours, there may be lack of confidential space in the educational environment for the young person and similarly in the parental work place. It is therefore important to give young people the choice of format when at all feasible [42].

Thought should be given as to when physical examination is required. Face-to-face consultation may be preferable particularly if young people are still growing. Unlike younger children, parents don’t always see young people undressing so may not be aware of development of abnormalities. Physical examination is also a key opportunity to discuss puberty, growth, and their bodily concerns with young people. Even simple things like obtaining the weight of a young person to calculate drug dosages can be a challenge if families do not have access to scales!

Learning to navigate the health system is another core transitional care skill made so much more challenging by the pandemic when we have seen the system change and change again as we rapidly readjust to life in the time of a pandemic. This is a key area for health professionals to pay attention to during consultations and ensure that young people know how to navigate the current health system i.e. know who to go to for what and when and how. Such training now will need to address how young people navigate virtual as well as face-to-face consultations.

The distribution of electronic questionnaires and checklists has become easier with the increased use of telemedicine and digital communication between families and rheumatology teams. A number of resources have recently been developed to support healthcare professionals, YP and families in telemedicine, both generically [43, 44] and specific to paediatric rheumatology / musculoskeletal disease [45, 46].

There is huge potential for telemedicine beyond the pandemic to facilitate access to health care in settings where there is little or no specialist services available locally. However significant challenges need to be addressed before virtual consultations are adopted within routine clinical practice particularly with respect to confidentiality, quality of care and digital poverty [47].

Including young people in service developments and use of telemedicine to aid transition processes

It is important to remember that ‘no size fits all’ as highlighted above [47,48,49] and examples of some of the pros and cons of telemedicine in transitional care are summarised in Table 2.

Table 2 Pros and cons of the use of telemedicine with respect to young people
Full size table

YP therefore need to be involved in discussions regarding service developments in the COVID 19-era particularly with respect to the use of telemedicine. Learning to navigate virtual as well as face-to face consultation is an additional skill for them to learn. Furthermore young people most in need of healthcare may be the most ‘digitally deprived’ as a result of poverty whether that be in terms of access to technology or private space to use that technology confidentially in; the drive to increased use of digital technologies may merely serve to increase health inequalities.

Involving YP from a range of socioeconomic backgrounds in service development has always been very important and was largely done face to face prior to the pandemic. Such involvement can now be readily facilitated by digital technologies and there are excellent resources to support professionals to work with YP virtually when face to face meetings are not possible due to social distancing restrictions [50].

General considerations regarding transition

The Covid pandemic and the resulting media coverage has provided valuable opportunities to discuss particular aspects of health with young people including viruses, infection risk, role of vaccination etc. As in all adolescent health care, routine psychosocial screening with respect to emotional well-being, sleep, fatigue and exercise is integral to all consultations [43, 50] and even more important during a pandemic as all themes encompassed by such tools have been significantly impacted (Table 3). Tools such as HEEADDSSSS (Home, Education, Exercise, Activities, Diet, Drugs, Sleep, Safety, Suicide, Social Media [50, 51] or THRxEADS (Transition, Home, Treatment, Education/Exercise, Activities, Diet/Drugs, Sleep, Safety, Suicide, Social Media) [52] can easily be incorporated into consultations, face to face or virtual with young people .

Table 3 Impact of Covid 19 pandemic on areas of HEEADSSSS screening
Full size table

HEADS and THREADS are useful strategies to both engage young people and find out about their lives but also to identify risk and protective factors which then assist in formulating future interventions whether that be to maximize adherence or how to orientate information giving or motivate. Questioning should be interactive and not interrogative, always leaving time for young people to answer. Active listening skills [52] and being comfortable with silence are key skills for rheumatology professionals irrespective of the format of the consultation. It is important to give warning before asking the more sensitive questions such as related to sexual or mental health. Healthcare professionals should always explain why they are asking such questions and remember that young people have the right not to answer, just like the rest of us! Unmet needs with respect to mental health provision as well as expertise in rheumatology services have been reported prior to the pandemic [53,54,55,56]. There remain potential unmet training needs with respect to effective communication with a discrepancy with what young people say is covered in such interviews and what the professional reports [57]. In view of the impact of the pandemic on the mental health of young people generally [16, 58], these needs are likely to have increased and compounded further by the negative impact on third sector providers of youth mental health support services. Training in adolescent health with particular attention to communication skills with digital technology remains an important component of developmentally appropriate transitional care [2, 59].

Practitioners should be mindful that jRMDs impact on the individual biopsychosocial development of YP as well as how that development influences jRMDs and therapy. Routine developmental assessment remains important as with any adolescent whether it be a face-to-face or virtual consultation. Individualised transition plans should be developed with active involvement of the young person so that they feel listened to and understood as an individual in their own right. Assessment of transition and transfer readiness using such plans are integral to every clinical encounter for young person.

Appropriate parental involvement during transitional care has also been reported to be associated with positive transitional care outcomes [4]. Parents of young people with long term health conditions report significant needs during this period [60]. Individualised transitional care plans, like those used with young people are also available to use with parents [61].

Every attempt should be made to keep the young person as well as possible and avoid any unplanned inpatient admissions particularly during the peri-transfer period. The first ever admission (emergency / routine) in an adult hospital during the peri-transfer period can cause unease at any time, potentially exacerbated by necessary processes during the Covid-19 pandemic. Preparation for this is important. The use of a patient held care plan may be helpful and could include considerations for blood tests or procedures to help alleviate anxiety [62].

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on health care provision for all ages and the full impact on the lengthy process of transition has yet to be realised. The PReS Position Statement aims to raise awareness of the pandemic’s impact on YP with jRMD, the impact on various aspects of transition and the ‘pros and cons’ of telemedicine. Routine practices in adolescent health remain core to clinical practice i.e. psychosocial screening and developmental assessment as these effectively inform the practitioner of both risk and protective factors as well as how to effectively engage the young person. Further research is needed to determine the impact of the COVID pandemic on team working, use of telemedicine and the effective engagement of young people in their care. Further work is needed to define the best model to ensure developmentally appropriate rheumatology care during adolescence and young adulthood with particular attention to the less researched third phase of transition in adult services.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

AYA:

Adolescent and young adult

DMARD:

Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug

EULAR:

European League Against Rheumatism

HEEADDSSSS:

Home, Education, Exercise, Activities, Diet, Drugs, Sleep, Safety, Suicide, Social Media

JDM:

Juvenile Dermatomyositis

jRMDs:

Juvenile-onset Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases

PReS:

Paediatric Rheumatology European Society

SHARE:

Single Hub and Access point for Paediatric Rheumatology in Europe

SLE:

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

UK:

United Kingdom

THRxEEADDSSSS:

Transition, Home, Treatment, Education, Exercise, Activities, Diet, Drugs, Sleep, Safety, Suicide, Social Media

YP:

Young People

References

  1. Willis E, McDonagh JE. Shifting the mindset – adolescent and young adult rheumatology in transition. Lancet Rheumatology. 2020;2(4):e236–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30163-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Foster HE, Minden K, Clemente D, Leon L, McDonagh JE, Kamphuis S, et al. EULAR/PReS standards and recommendations for the transitional care of young people with juvenile-onset rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(4):639–46. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McDonagh JE, Farre A. Transitional Care in Rheumatology: a Review of the Literature from the Past 5 Years. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2019;21(10):57.

  4. Colver A, McConachie H, Le Couteur A, Dovey-Pearce G, Mann KD, McDonagh JE, et al. A longitudinal, observational study of the features of transitional healthcare associated with better outcomes for young people with long-term conditions. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1102-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Stollon N, Zhong Y, Ferris M, Bhansali S, Pitts B, Rak E, et al. Chronological age when healthcare transition skills are mastered in adolescents/young adults with inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(18):3349–55. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i18.3349.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Farre A, Wood V, McDonagh JE, Parrt JR, Reape D, Rapley T, et al. Health professionals' and managers' definitions of developmentally appropriate healthcare for young people: conceptual dimensions and embedded controversies. Arch Dis Child. 2016;101(7):628–33. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-309473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McDonagh JE, Farre A, Gleeson H, Rapley T, Dovey-Pearce G, Reape D, et al. Making healthcare work for young people. Arch Dis Child. 2018;103(6):623. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-314573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cai RA, Chaplin H, Livermore P, Lee M, Sen D, Wedderburn LR, et al. Development of a benchmarking toolkit for adolescent and young adult rheumatology services (BeTAR). Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2019;17(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-019-0323-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. McDonagh JE, Southwood TR, Shaw KL. The impact of a coordinated transitional care programme on adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology. 2007;46(1):161–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kel198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dolezalova P, Anton J, Avcin T, Beresford MW, Brogan PA. Constantin T, et al the European network for care of children with paediatric rheumatic diseases: care across borders. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019;58(7):1188–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/key439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zisman D, Samad A, Ardoin SP, Chira P, White P, Lavi I, et al. US adult Rheumatologists' perspectives on the Transition process for young adults with rheumatic conditions. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020;72(3):432–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ravelli A, Sinigaglia L, Cimaz R, Alessio M, Breda L, Cattalini M, et al. Transitional care of young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Italy: results of a Delphi consensus survey. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019;37(6):1084–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zimmermann P, Curtis N. Why is COVID-19 less severe in children? A review of the proposed mechanisms underlying the age-related difference in severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2021;106:429–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Orben A, Tomova L, Blakemore SJ. The effects of social deprivation on adolescent development and mental health. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(8):634–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30186-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Klein JD, Koletzko B, El-Shabrawi MH, Hadjipanayis A, Thacker N, Bhutta Z. Promoting and supporting children’s health and healthcare during COVID-19-international Paediatric association position statement. Arch Dis Child. 2020;105(7):620–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-319370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Loades ME, Chatburn E, Higson-Sweeney N, Reynolds S, Shafran R, Brigden A et al . Rapid Systematic Review: The Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in the Context of COVID-19. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020;59(11):1218–1239.e3.

  17. Shanahan L, Steinhoff A, Bechtiger L, Murray AL, Nivette A, Hepp U et al . Emotional Distress in Young Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence of Risk and Resilience from a Longitudinal Cohort Study. Psychol Med. Published online 2020.

  18. Hanghøj S, Pappot N, Hjerming M, Taarnhøj GA, Boisen KA, Pappot H. Experiences of Social Isolation During the COVID-19 Lockdown Among Adolescents and Young Adult Cancer Patients and Survivors J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2021 Online ahead of print.

  19. Seah KM. COVID-19: exposing digital poverty in a pandemic. Int J Surg. 2020;79(January):127–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.057.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. The Health Foundation. Covid-19 chart series https://www.health.org.uk/what-we-do/responding-to-covid-19/covid-19-chart-series (last Accessed 5 May 2021).

  21. Boodhun N, Jay N, Carzedda D, Rogers M. Prioritising paediatric staff and space so every child has access to care archives of disease in childhood published online first: 02 November 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-320565.

  22. Ashton JJ, Kammermeier J, Spray C, Russell RK, Hansen R, Howarth LJ, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on diagnosis and management of paediatric inflammatory bowel disease during lockdown: a UK nationwide study. Arch Dis Child. 2020;105(12):1186–91. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-319751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. World Health Organisation. Second round of the national pulse survey on continuity of essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic: Interim Report January–March 2021. World Health Organisation. WHO reference number WHO/2019-nCoV/EHS_continuity/survey/2021.1 (https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/340937/WHO-2019-nCoV-EHS-continuity-survey-2021.1-eng.pdf?sequence=1) last accessed 12 may 2021.

  24. Healthwatch. GP access during covid-19: a review of our evidence: April 2019–December 2020. 2021. www.healthwatch.co.uk/sites/healthwatch.co.uk/files/20210215%20GP%20access%20during%20COVID19%20report%20final.pdf

  25. McCann LJ, Tattersall R, Clinch J, Swan J, Foster H, McDonagh JE on behalf of the PReS JDM working party. Transitional care during the Covid-19 pandemic for Young People with Juvenile-onset Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases. https://www.pres.eu/files/PReS.TransitionStatement.FINAL.clean.16.01.2021.pdf . Last Accessed 19 Mar 2021).

  26. Colver A, Pearse R, Watson RM, Fay M, Rapley T, Mann KD, et al. How well do services for young people with long term conditions deliver features proposed to improve transition? BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):337. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3168-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Suris JC, Akre C. Key elements for, and indicators of, a successful transition: an international Delphi study. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(6):612–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.02.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hilderson D, Moons P, Westhovens R, Wouters C. Attitudes of rheumatology practitioners toward transition and transfer from paediatric to adult health care. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32(12):3887–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2273-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jensen PT, Paul GV, LaCount S, Peng J, Spencer CH, Higgins GC, et al. Assessment of transition readiness in adolescents and young adults with chronic health conditions. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2017;15(1):70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-017-0197-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Crowley R, Wolfe I, Lock K, McKee M. Improving the transition between paediatric and adult healthcare: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2011;96(6):548–53. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2010.202473.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Harden PN, Walsh G, Bandler N, Bradley S, Lonsdale D, Taylor J, et al. Bridging the gap: an integrated paediatric to adult clinical service for young adults with kidney failure. BMJ. 2012;344(jun01 1):e3718. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e3718.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hart LC, Patel-Nguyen SV, Merkley MG, Jonas DE. An evidence map for interventions addressing transition from pediatric to adult care: a systematic review of systematic reviews. J Pediatr Nurs. 2019;48:18–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2019.05.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. van Staa A, Sattoe JN, Strating MM. Experiences with and outcomes of two interventions to maximize engagement of chronically ill adolescents during hospital consultations: a mixed methods study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2015;30(5):757–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2015.05.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bower P, Campbell S, Bojke C, Sibbald B. Team structure, team climate and the quality of care in primary care: an observational study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(4):273–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.4.273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Cramm JM, Strating MM, Nieboer AP. The role of team climate in improving the quality of chronic care delivery: a longitudinal study among professionals working with chronically ill adolescents in transitional care programmes. BMJ Open. 2014;4(5):e005369. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005369.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Clemente D, Leon L, Foster H, Carmona L, Minden K. Transitional care for rheumatic conditions in Europe: current clinical practice and available resources. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2017;15(1):49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-017-0179-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Strangfeld A, Schäfer M, Gianfrancesco MA, Lawson-Tovey S, Liew JW, Ljung L et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death in people with rheumatic diseases: results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician-reported registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021:annrheumdis-2020-219498.

  38. Giovanelli A, Ozer EM, Dahl RE. Leveraging technology to improve health in adolescence: a developmental science perspective. J Adolesc Health. 2020;67(2):S7–S13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.02.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Got Transition. Toolkit for Joint Telehealth Visit with Pediatric and Adult Clinicians and Transferring Young Adults. National Alliance to Advance Adolescent Health, USA https://www.gottransition.org/resource/?telehealth-toolkit-joint-visit-pediatric-adult-clinicians last Accessed 12 May 2021.

  40. Evans YN, Golub S, Sequeira GM, Eisenstein E, North S. Using telemedicine to reach adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Adolesc Health. 2020;67(4):469–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Flannery H, Portnoy S, Daniildi X, Kambakara Gedara C, Korchak G, Lambert D et al. Keeping young people connected during COVID 19: the role of online groups Arch Dis Child. 2021:archdischild-2020-320222. Online ahead of print.

  42. Young People’s Health Special Interest Group (YPHSIG) Adolescent Health Group for RCGP. RCPCH, RCGP, AYPH. “Digital by default” or digital divide? Virtual healthcare consultations with young people 10–25 years, 2020. https://www.yphsig.org.uk/resources-1/adolescent-healthcare/communication-skills/joint-statement-on-virtual-consultation. Accessed 19 Mar 2020.

  43. Sawyer SM. Psychosocial assessments after COVID-19. J Adolesc Health. 2021;68(3):429–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.12.126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Car J, Koh GCH, Foong PS, Wang CJ. Video consultations in primary and specialist care during the covid-19 pandemic and beyond. BMJ. 2020;371:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Shenoi S, Hayward K, Curran ML, Kessler E, Mehta JJ, Riebschleger MP, et al. Telemedicine in pediatric rheumatology: this is the time for the community to embrace a new way of clinical practice. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2020;18(1):1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Paediatric Musculoskeletal Matters International http://www.pmmonline.org/about-pmm (last Accessed 19 Mar 2021).

  47. Barney A, Buckelew S, Mesheriakova V, Raymond-Flesch M. The COVID-19 pandemic and rapid implementation of adolescent and young adult telemedicine: challenges and opportunities for innovation. J Adolesc Health. 2020;67(2):164–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.05.006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health . Reimagining the future of paediatric care posrt-COVID-19 (June 2020) RCPCH, London pp15–19 (https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/resources/reimagining-future-paediatric-care-post-covid-19-reflective-report-rapid-learning last Accessed 7 May 2021)].

  49. PPI and technology https://www.spcr.nihr.ac.uk/PPI/resources-for-researchers/faq/how-do-i-hold-ppi-meetings-using-virtual-tools (last Accessed 19 Mar 2021).

  50. Doukrou M, Segal TY. Fifteen-minute consultation: communicating with young people -how to use HEEADSSS, a psychosocial interview for adolescents. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2018;103(1):15–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-311553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Young Persons Health Special Interest Group. The YPHSIG APP https://www.yphsig.org.uk/resources-1/app last Accessed 19 Mar 2021).

  52. Chadi N, Amaria K, Kaufman M. Expand your HEADS, follow the THRxEADS! Paediatr Child Health. 2017;22(1):23–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxw007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Knight A, Vickery M, Faust L, Muscal E, Davis A, Harris J, et al. Gaps in mental health Care for Youth with Rheumatologic Conditions: a mixed methods study of perspectives from behavioral health providers. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019;71(5):591–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Palman J, Mcdonagh JE. Young minds: mental health and transitional care in adolescent and young adult rheumatology. Open Access Rheumatol. 2020;12:309–21. https://doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S228083.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Rubinstein TB, Ogbu EA, Rodriguez M, Waqar L, Woo JMP, Davis AM, et al. Prioritized agenda for mental Health Research in pediatric rheumatology from the childhood arthritis and rheumatology research Alliance mental health workgroup. J Rheumatol. 2020;47(11):1687–95. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Davis AM, Rubinstein TB, Rodriguez, Knight AM. Mental Health care for youth with rheumatologic diseases – bridging the gap. Pediatric Rheuamtology Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2017;15(1):85.

  57. Boisen KA, Hertz PG, Blix C, Teilmann G. Is HEADS in our heads? Health risk behavior is not routinely discussed with young people with chronic conditions. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2016;28(4):429–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2015-0015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Ford T, John A, Gunnell D. Mental health of children and young people during pandemic. BMJ. 2021;372:n614. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Rapley T, Farre A, Parr JE, Wood V, Reape D, Dovey-Pearce G, et al. Normalizing developmentally appropriate healthcare for young people in hospitals. BMJ Open. 2019;9(9):e029107. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Heath G, Farre A, Shaw K. Parenting a child with chronic illness as they transition into adulthood: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of parents' experiences. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(1):76–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. McDonagh JE, Southwood TR, Shaw KL. Growing up and moving on in rheumatology: development and preliminary evaluation of a transitional care programme for a multicentre cohort of adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Child Health Care. 2006;10(1):22–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493506060203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Council for Disabled children Emergency Healthcare Plans. https://councilfordisabledchildren.org.uk/our-work/health-and-wellbeing/practice/emergency-healthcare-plans (last Accessed 12 May 2021).

  63. Naar-King S, Suarez M. Motivational interviewing with adolescents and young adults. New York: Guildford Press; 2011. p. 30–3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

JMcD is supported by Versus Arthritis Centre for Epidemiology (UK grant No: 21755) and the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre.

The authors would like to acknowledge members of the PReS JDM core working group for help in the early development of the position statement [Meredyth Wilkinson, Charalampia Papadopolou, Helga Sanner, Judith Wienke, Saskia Veldcamp, Raquel Campanilho-Marques, Sara Röstland, Mette Nǿrgaard], members of the PReS Clinical Affairs Committee and Chairs of the PReS working parties for their review and members of the PReS Executive and Council for their support and ratification [Angelo Ravelli, Yosef Uziel, Michael W Beresford, Jelena Vojinovic].

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Versus Arthritis Centre for Epidemiology; Centre for MSK Research, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, 2nd floor, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK

    Janet E. McDonagh

  2. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK

    Janet E. McDonagh

  3. Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology, Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK

    Janet E. McDonagh

  4. Sheffield Children’s Hospital and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Manchester, UK

    Rachel Tattersall

  5. Bristol Royal Hospital for Children and Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, UK

    Jacqui Clinch

  6. Public Health Family Nurse, Family Nurse Partnership, Wallacetown Health Centre, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK

    Joanne Swan

  7. Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PReS) Juvenile Dermatomyositis Working Party, Manchester, UK

    Joanne Swan & Liza McCann

  8. Paediatric Rheumatology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Helen E. Foster

  9. Honorary Consultant Great North Children’s Hospital, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Helen E. Foster

  10. Chair Paediatric Global Musculoskeletal Task Force, Manchester, UK

    Helen E. Foster

  11. Consultant Paediatric Rheumatologist, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK

    Liza McCann

  12. Honorary Clinical Senior Lecturer, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

    Liza McCann

Authors
  1. Janet E. McDonagh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rachel Tattersall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jacqui Clinch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Joanne Swan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Helen E. Foster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Liza McCann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LMcC and JS conceived the original idea for the position statement and all authors contributed to it’s development; JMcD led on the writing of the first draft of the paper. All authors were involved in revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreed to submit to the current journal; gave final approval of the version to be published; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work”.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet E. McDonagh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

HF has received unrestricted educational grants from Pfizer, Sobi and Sanofi Genzyme. JMcD has received consultancy fees from Pfizer, CSL-Behring.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McDonagh, J.E., Tattersall, R., Clinch, J. et al. Developmentally appropriate transitional care during the Covid-19 pandemic for young people with juvenile-onset rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: the rationale for a position statement. Pediatr Rheumatol 19, 136 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-021-00609-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-021-00609-y

Pediatric Rheumatology

ISSN: 1546-0096