Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Patients with enthesitis related arthritis show similar monocyte function pattern as seen in adult axial spondyloarthropathy

Pediatric Rheumatology volume 18, Article number: 6 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Axial SpA and Enthesitis related arthritis (ERA) patients show strong HLA-B27 association, gut dysbiosis, high toll like receptor (TLR)2 and 4 expression on monocytes, pro-inflammatory cytokine production and elevated levels of TLR4 endogenous ligands [tenascin-c (TNC) and myeloid related protein (MRP)8/14] in serum. Hence, we aimed to understand if these diseases have similar or different monocyte response.

Methods

Fifty adult axial SpA, 52 ERA patients and 25 healthy controls (HC) were enrolled. Cytokine-producing monocyte frequency before and after stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), peptidoglycan (PG), TNC or MRP8 were measured in whole blood (WB) and synovial fluid mononuclear cells (SFMC) by flow cytometry. Also, IL-6, TNF, MMP3, TNC and MRP8/14 levels were measured in unstimulated and TLR ligand stimulated WB cultures supernatant by ELISA. Finally, the mRNA expression levels of TNF and IL-6 were measured post stimulation with LPS, TNC and MRP8.

Results

At baseline, ERA and axial SpA patients showed similar TNF-α producing monocyte frequency which was higher than HC. MRP8 simulation led to increased TNF-α producing monocyte frequency in ERA than axial SpA. TNC and MRP8 stimulation led to similar IL-6 producing monocyte frequency in axial SpA and ERA patients. Baseline TNF and IL-6 producing monocyte frequency also modestly correlated with disease activity scores. TNF and IL-6 producing monocyte frequency increased in response to TLR stimulation in SFMC from both patients.

In culture supernatants, axial SpA and ERA patients showed similar TNF production at baseline. MRP8 and TNC stimulation led to higher TNF production from ERA. Baseline IL-6 and MMP3 production was higher in ERA while TLR stimulation led to similar IL-6 and MMP3 production from axial SpA and ERA. TNC stimulation led to higher MMP3 production in ERA. mRNA expression in response to TLR stimulation was observed to be similar in axial SpA and ERA.

TNC production was higher in ERA at baseline, while MRP8/14 production was higher in axial SpA than ERA post stimulation.

Conclusion

ERA patients have similar monocyte response to exogenous and endogenous TLR ligands as patients with axial SpA. This suggests that differences between pediatric and adult-onset SpA are minimal and they may have a common pathogenesis.

Background

Spondyloarthropathies (SpA) are a group of inflammatory disorders characterized by involvement of the spine and peripheral joints. In addition, entheseal inflammation is central to its pathogenesis. Adult axial SpA is seen in adults who present with inflammatory back pain (IBP) and may or may not have radiological evidence of sacroiliitis (1). Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is the prototype of axial SpA that has a very strong association with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 with more than 95% patients being positive for it (2, 3). HLA-B27 along with environmental factors like mechanical stress and gut microbes are implicated in the pathogenesis of SpA.

Subclinical gut inflammation has been reported in 60% of patients with AS (4). Gastrointestinal symptoms and antibodies associated with gastrointestinal diseases, and IgA levels were associated with high disease activity in patients with SpA (5). Gut dysbiosis leads to leakage and translocation of bacterial products into the systemic circulation (6). These can then act via toll like receptors (TLR) s especially 2 and 4 (7) and activate monocytes/macrophages leading to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines as well as IL-23 which skews the immune response towards IL-17 production by T cells and innate immune cells. Patients with AS and ERA show high expression of TLR 2 and 4 on monocytes as well as produce higher pro-inflammatory cytokines compared to healthy controls (HC) (8,9,10,11). In addition, we have recently shown that endogenous ligands like myeloid related protein (MRP)8/14 and Tenascin-C (TNC) are elevated in sera from AS patients compared to HC and their levels correlate with activity of the disease (12, 13).

Enthesitis related arthritis (ERA) category of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is characterized by lower limb arthritis and enthesitis and is usually seen in boys older than 6 years (14). HLA-B27 is present in 60–80% of these children (15). IBP, the hallmark of AS develops in a proportion of patients after 5–10 years and about one-third progress to AS in adulthood (16). ERA patients also show gut dysbiosis and presence of autoantibodies associated with inflammation of gastrointestinal mucosa like antibodies to tissue transglutaminase or anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (17). They have elevated fecal calprotectin, high pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF and IL-6) in synovial fluid (SF) and TLR4 endogenous ligands (TNC and MRP8/14) in serum (18,19,20,21,22). In addition, they also have increased TLR2 and 4 expression on monocytes in blood and SF (8).

Though ERA and AS show similarities in their clinical features, HLA-B27 association and some of the immune abnormalities, there are differences like higher prevalence of enthesitis and arthritis in juvenile onset SpA and a higher prevalence of IBP and uveitis in AS (23, 24) Thus, we aimed to see if the monocyte response seen in these two diseases is similar or different. To study this, we analyzed the frequency of cytokine producing monocytes in peripheral blood (PB) and synovial fluid mononuclear cells (SFMC) at baseline as well as on stimulation with both exogenous and endogenous TLR ligands. In addition, we also measured the production of cytokines as well as endogenous TLR ligands at baseline as well as on stimulation. Finally, we assessed the mRNA expression levels post-stimulation with the endogenous and exogenous TLR ligands.

Patients and methods

Patients

Since SpA is a male-dominant disease, and also to avoid gender difference as a potential confounder, we enrolled only male subjects. Adult axial SpA patients fulfilling the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society [ASAS] classification criteria for axial SpA (25) and ERA patients fulfilling the JIA-International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) classification criteria (26) were included as study subjects. Young adult males were included as HC. None of the patient’s with ERA had psoriasis or inflammatory bowel disease.

Clinical assessments included Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (27) for adult axial SpA patients and Juvenile Spondyloarthropathy Disease Activity Score (JSpADA) (28) for ERA patients. These were assessed by the treating rheumatologist at the time of sample collection.

The PB was collected from all subjects whereas SF was collected from only those patients who required intra-articular steroid injection as a part of their treatment. All experiments were performed on whole blood (WB) as it is difficult to get a higher quantity of blood from children.

Assessment of frequency of pro-inflammatory cytokine producing monocytes

500 μl PB was diluted (1:1) with RPMI (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, MA, USA) and 1% antibiotic (Antibiotic-antimycotic, Gibco, MA, USA) (complete culture medium) and cultured in 24-well plates for 4 h in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C.

Stimulation of cells with TLR ligands

Cells were stimulated with following ligands for 4 h: LPS (100 ng/ml; a TLR4 ligand, Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA), Peptidoglycan (PG, 5 μg/ml; a TLR2 ligand, Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA), MRP8 (5 μg/ml; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) or TNC (10 μg/ml; Merck Millipore, MA, USA). Unstimulated cells served as baseline. 10 μg/ml Brefeldin A (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) was added as secretion inhibitor in all cultures.

Staining of cells and flow cytometry

Cells were surface-stained with fluorescent monoclonal antibody to CD14 (BD Biosciences, CA, USA). After RBC lysis (BD FACS lysis solution, BD Biosciences, CA, USA), cells were fixed and permeabilized (with BD Cytofix/Cytoperm solution, BD Biosciences, CA, USA). The cells were later stained for intracellular IL-6 and TNF, using fluorescent monoclonal antibodies (BD Biosciences, CA, USA). 105 cells were acquired in the flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, CA USA). The monocytes were gated in the side scatter (SSC) vs CD14 plot. In the CD14+ gate, cells were analysed and the frequency of CD14+ IL-6+ and CD14+ TNF+ cells was calculated using Navios software (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA). Gating strategy is shown in Additional file 1.

In vitro production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and MMP3

500 μl PB was diluted (1:1) with complete culture medium and dispensed in 24-well plates. Cells were stimulated with following ligands (in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C) for 24 h: LPS (2.5 μg/ml), PG (5 μg/ml), MRP8 (5 μg/ml), TNC (10 μg/ml). Unstimulated cells served as the baseline. In the culture supernatants, levels of TNF (BD OptEIA Kit, CA, USA), IL-6 (BD OptEIA Kit, CA, USA) and MMP3 (R&D systems, MN, USA) were measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The minimum detection limit was 7.8 pg/ml for TNF, 4.7 pg/ml for IL-6 and 31.3 pg/ml for MMP3.

Validation of pro-inflammatory cytokine production by quantitative PCR

In a subset of patients and HC (n = 5), 500 μl PB was diluted (1:1) with complete culture medium and dispensed in 24-well plates. Cells were stimulated with following ligands (in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C) for 4 h: LPS (2.5 μg/ml), MRP8 (5 μg/ml) and TNC (10 μg/ml). Unstimulated cells served as baseline. The cells were later stored in TRIzol at − 80 °C (Thermo Fischer Scientific, MA, USA) till RNA isolation.

After thawing the cells and vortexing to facilitate lysis, the sample was centrifuged at 10,000×g for 10 mins at 4 °C. The supernatant was carefully aspirated and transferred to fresh microcentrifuge tubes. Following this, 200 μl of chloroform (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) was added to the suspension, mixed manually for 15 mins and kept at room temperature for 10 mins. It was then centrifuged at 12,000×g for 15 min at 4 °C. The aqueous layer was carefully aspirated and transferred to fresh microcentrifuge tubes. 500 μl of isopropyl-alcohol (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) was added to the separated aqueous layer and mixed. The suspension was centrifuged at 12,000×g for 10 mins at 4 °C. The RNA pellet was then washed twice with 1 ml of 75% ethanol (Merck Millipore, MA, USA) and centrifuged at 7500×g. The pellet was then dried at RT. Finally, the RNA pellet was dissolved in 10 μl of RNase free water. The absorbance was taken at 260 and 280 nm in Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, MA, USA).

cDNA was prepared using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) as done in previous studies [6]. Subsequently, real-time PCR was performed using TaqMan Fast Advanced Master mix (Thermo Fischer, MA, USA). Taqman gene expression assay kits were purchased from Applied Biosystems (CA, USA), the IDs being Hs00174128_m1 (TNF), Hs00174131_m1 (IL-6) and HS02786624_g1 (GAPDH). Each 20 μl reaction mixture comprised of 10 μl TaqMan Fast Advanced Master mix, 1 μl TaqMan assay probe, 7 μl RNase free water and 2 μl cDNA. The reaction conditions in the real-time PCR amplification and detection instrument (LightCycler 480 Instrument II, Roche Molecular Systems Inc., CA, USA) were 50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 2 min and finally 40 PCR cycles of 95 °C for 3 s and 60 °C for 30 s.

GAPDH was used as a housekeeping gene. Relative fold change was determined by the ΔΔCt method (Ct = cycle threshold), where fold change =2-ΔΔCt and ΔΔCt = [Ct(TNF/IL-6)-CtGAPDH] for stimulated (LPS/TNC/MRP8) sample - [Ct(TNF/IL-6)-CtGAPDH] for unstimulated sample. More than a 2-fold increase in expression was considered significant.

In vitro production of TNC and MRP8/14 in response to LPS

500 μl PB was diluted (1:1) with complete culture medium and dispensed in 24 well plates. The cells were stimulated (24 h in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C) with either LPS (2.5 μg/ml) or left unstimulated (baseline). Following this, levels of MRP8/14 (LEGEND MAX Human MRP8/14 Calprotectin ELISA kit, BioLegend, CA, USA) and TNC [Tenascin C large (FNIIIC), IBL International; Hamburg, Germany] in culture supernatants were measured by ELISA as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The minimum detection limit of MRP8/14 was 3.13 ng/ml and that of TNC was 0.38 ng/ml.

Studies on synovial fluid cells

The SFMC’s were isolated by density gradient centrifugation using Histopaque 1077 (Sigma, MO, USA). Inflammatory response of SFMC was studied using the protocol described above for PB, except that 106 SFMC/ml were used. Cells were stimulated with LPS, PG, TNC, MRP8 or left unstimulated (baseline); following which the TNF and IL-6 producing monocyte frequencies were measured as per the above-mentioned protocol for flow cytometry.

Statistical analysis

All results are represented as median [Interquartile range (IQR)]. Intergroup comparison was done using non-parametric tests. Correlation with disease activity was assessed using Spearman’s correlation and values are expressed as r (95% confidence intervals). p-value < 0.05 was taken as significant. Exact p values are given unless it exceeded p < 0.0001. Graph pad prism 7 (trial version) was used for all statistical analysis.

Results

Patients

The study included 50 adult axial SpA and 52 ERA patients. In addition, 25 healthy adults [HC, median age 31, range 26–33 years] were included as controls. The demographic data and disease activity of patients was assessed at the time of collection of blood sample and is given in Table 1.

Table 1 Clinical and demographic details of adult axial SpA and ERA patients
Full size table

Whole blood diluted 1:1 with complete culture medium was used for assessing the pro-inflammatory cytokine producing monocyte frequency, production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, MMP3 and TLR4 endogenous ligands as well as the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokine producing gene.

Frequency of pro-inflammatory cytokine producing monocytes in blood

TNF producing monocyte frequency

Adult axial SpA and ERA patients had similar frequency of TNF producing monocytes at baseline which were higher than HC (Fig. 1a). Post-stimulation with exogenous (LPS and PG) or endogenous (TNC) TLR ligands also, both patient groups had similar frequency of TNF producing monocytes which was higher than HC (p < 0.0001). However, MRP8 stimulation, led to higher TNF producing monocyte frequency in ERA patients compared to adult axial SpA (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1b, c, Additional file 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

TNF and IL-6 producing monocyte frequency (PB) in HC, SpA and ERA patients. The figure shows scatter plots representing frequency of TNF and IL-6 producing monocytes in PB in HC (25), SpA (50) and ERA (52) patients as analysed via flow cytometry. Each dot represents an individual sample. Horizontal line represents median. WB diluted 1:1 with complete culture medium was used for assessing the pro-inflammatory cytokine producing monocyte frequency. Frequency of TNF producing monocytes in response to (a). No stimulation (b). LPS or PG stimulation (c). TNC or MRP8 stimulation. Frequency of IL-6 producing monocytes in response to (d). No stimulation. (e.) LPS or PG stimulation (f). TNC or MRP8 stimulation. WB: whole blood, HC: healthy controls, SpA: Spondyloarthropathy, ERA: enthesitis related arthritis, Uns- unstimulated, LPS- Lipopolysaccaride, PG- peptidoglycan, TNC- Tenascin-C and MRP8-Myeloid related protein 8, TNF: tumor necrosis factor, IL-6: Interleukin-6

Full size image

IL-6 producing monocyte frequency

At baseline as well as post stimulation with exogenous TLR ligands (LPS and PG), ERA patients had higher IL-6 producing monocyte frequency compared to adult axial SpA (Fig. 1d, e). However, stimulation with endogenous ligands of TLR4 (TNC and MRP8) led to similar IL-6 producing monocyte frequency in both adult axial SpA and ERA patients which was observed to be higher than HC (p < 0.0001; Fig. 1f) (Additional file 2).

Correlation with disease activity

The baseline frequency of TNF producing monocytes from ERA and adult axial SpA patients showed correlation with their corresponding disease activity scores [ERA- JSpADA (r = 0.40; p = 0.0006); adult axial SpA- BASDAI (r = 0.35, p = 0.0043)] (Fig. 2a, c).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Baseline pro-inflammatory monocyte frequency correlation (PB) with disease activity scores in SpA and ERA patients. Correlation in ERA patients: a. baseline TNF% vs JSpADA b. baseline IL-6% vs JspADA. Correlation in SpA patients: c. baseline TNF% vs BASDAI, d. baseline IL-6% vs BASDAI. PB: peripheral blood, BASDAI Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, JspADA Juvenile spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score

Full size image

Baseline IL-6 producing monocyte frequency from ERA patients showed a modest correlation with JSpADA (r = 0.28, p = 0.044) (Fig. 2b).

Pro-inflammatory cytokine and MMP3 production in response to TLR ligands

At baseline, as well as post stimulation with TLR exogenous ligands (LPS and PG), adult axial SpA and ERA patients showed similar production of TNF which was higher than HC (Fig. 3a, b). Stimulation with the endogenous ligands of TLR4 however, led to higher production of TNF from ERA patients compared to adult axial SpA (Fig. 3c) (Additional file 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

TNF, IL-6 and MMP3 production (PB) in HC, SpA and ERA patients. Scatter plots representing TNF, IL-6 and MMP3 production in PB in three group of subjects, HC (25), SpA (50) and ERA (52) patients as measured via ELISA. Each dot represents an individual sample. Horizontal line represents median. WB diluted 1:1 with complete culture medium was used for assessing the pro-inflammatory cytokine production post stimulation with endogenous and exogenous ligands. TNF production in response to (a). No stimulation (b). LPS or PG stimulation (c). TNC or MRP8 stimulation. IL-6 production in response to (d). No stimulation. (e.) LPS or PG stimulation (f). TNC or MRP8 stimulation. MMP3 production in response to (g). No stimulation. (h.) LPS or PG stimulation (i). TNC or MRP8 stimulation. WB: whole blood, HC: healthy controls, SpA: Spondyloarthropathy, ERA: enthesitis related arthritis, Uns- unstimulated, LPS- Lipopolysaccaride, PG- peptidoglycan, TNC- Tenascin-C and MRP8-Myeloid related protein 8, TNF: tumor necrosis factor, IL-6: Interleukin-6, MMP3: Matrix metalloproteinase 3

Full size image

At baseline, IL-6 production was higher in ERA patients than adult axial SpA (p = 0.0174; Fig. 3d). However, stimulation with exogenous (LPS and PG) as well as endogenous (TNC and MRP8) TLR ligands led to similar production of IL-6 from adult axial SpA and ERA patients which was higher than HC (Fig. 3e, f; Additional file 3).

At baseline, the MMP3 production level was observed to be higher in ERA patients compared to adult axial SpA (p = 0.0164; Fig. 3g). However, stimulation with LPS, PG and MRP8 led to similar MMP3 production from adult axial SpA and ERA patients which was higher than HC. On stimulation with TNC however, ERA patients produced more MMP3 as compared to adult axial SpA patients (p = 0.012) (Fig. 3h, i; Additional file 3).

Validation of pro-inflammatory cytokine production by quantitative PCR

Comparison of the normalized Ct values indicate that stimulation with exogenous (LPS) as well as endogenous (TNC and MRP8) TLR ligands showed similar TNF fold change values in ERA and adult axial SpA patients which was higher than HC (p = 0.0079). Similar results were also observed for IL-6 (p = 0.0079) (Additional file 4).

Production of endogenous ligands in response to LPS

In unstimulated cultures, the TNC production was higher in ERA patients compared to adult axial SpA patients (p = 0.0285). However, on stimulation with LPS, the levels were observed to be similar in adult axial SpA and ERA patients which was higher than HC (Fig. 4a; Additional file 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

TNC and MRP8/14 production (PB) in HC, adult axial SpA and ERA patients. Scatter plots representing TNC and MRP8/14 production in PB in three group of subjects, as measured via ELISA. Each dot represents an individual sample. Horizontal line represents median. WB diluted 1:1 with complete culture medium was used for assessing the endogenous ligand production post stimulation with LPS. a. TNC production from HC (12), adult axial SpA (36) and ERA (36) patients in response to no stimulation or LPS stimulation b. MRP8/14 production in HC (25), adult axial SpA (50) and ERA (52) patients in response to no stimulation or LPS stimulation. WB: whole blood, HC: healthy controls, SpA: Spondyloarthropathy, ERA: enthesitis related arthritis, Uns- unstimulated, LPS- Lipopolysaccaride, TNC- Tenascin-C and MRP8/14-Myeloid related protein 8/14

Full size image

At baseline, adult axial SpA and ERA patients showed similar production of MRP8/14 which was higher than HC (p < 0.0001). However, post stimulation with LPS, the MRP8/14 production was observed to be higher in adult axial SpA patients compared to ERA (p = 0.0051) (Fig. 4b; Additional file 5).

Frequency of pro-inflammatory cytokine producing monocytes in synovial fluid

106 SFMC/ml in complete culture medium was used for assessing the pro-inflammatory cytokine producing monocytes in SF. The SF samples were available from 10 adult axial SpA and 10 ERA patients. At baseline, the TNF producing monocyte frequency was observed to be higher in ERA patients compared to adult axial SpA (p = 0.0041). However, stimulation with the endogenous as well as exogenous ligands of TLR4 led to similar TNF producing monocyte frequency from both patient subsets (Fig. 5a) (Additional file 6).

Fig. 5
figure 5

TNF and IL-6 producing monocytes in SFMC in SpA vs ERA patients. Scatter plots representing frequency of TNF and IL-6 producing monocytes in SFMC in SpA (10) and ERA (10) patients in response to exogenous and endogenous TLR4 ligands analysed via flow cytometry. Each dot represents an individual sample. Horizontal line represents median. 106 SFMC/ml in complete culture medium was used. a. Frequency of TNF producing monocytes (b). Frequency of IL-6 producing monocytes. WB: whole blood, SpA: Spondyloarthropathy, ERA: enthesitis related arthritis Uns- unstimulated, LPS- Lipopolysaccaride, PG- peptidoglycan, TNC- Tenascin-C and MRP8-Myeloid related protein 8, TNF: tumor necrosis factor, IL-6: Interleukin-6

Full size image

At baseline as well as post stimulation with the endogenous ligands (TNC and MRP8/14), IL-6 producing monocyte frequency was elevated in ERA patients compared to adult axial SpA patients. Stimulation with the exogenous TLR ligands led to similar frequency of IL-6 producing monocytes from both patient subsets. (Fig. 5b) (Additional file 6).

Discussion

Both ERA and adult axial SpA patients had similar monocyte responses with minor differences. Both had higher frequencies of pro inflammatory cytokine producing monocytes as well as TNF, IL-6, MMP3, TNC and MRP8/14 production at baseline and post-stimulation with TLR exogenous and endogenous ligands as compared to HC. The cytokine producing monocyte frequency at baseline also correlated with the disease activity. Stimulation with TLR ligands led to similar increase in frequency of TNF producing monocytes in SFMC’s. However, the IL-6 producing monocyte frequency was higher in ERA patients than adult axial SpA post stimulation with exogenous ligands of TLR4.

Adult axial SpA and ERA patients had higher frequency of cytokine producing monocyte frequency at baseline as compared to HC. This suggests towards the presence of pre-activated monocytes in both patient subsets. Previously in patients with adult axial SpA, elevated frequencies of pro-inflammatory cytokine producing monocytes was observed. However, this was observed only in patients receiving conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and not in those receiving anti-TNF therapy (29). Methotrexate (MTX) has not been observed to inhibit cytokine production by monocytes (30) while prednisolone has been shown to reduce TNF production from monocytes (31). None of the patients included in the present study were receiving anti-TNF therapy and a small proportion of them were on MTX and prednisolone.

Positive correlation of the baseline pro-inflammatory cytokine producing monocyte frequency with disease activity was observed for both adult axial SpA and ERA patients. This suggests that cytokines produced by monocytes contribute to inflammation. An association between the serum levels of inflammatory mediators and disease activity in AS has been reported (32, 33) Moreover, therapeutic success of anti-TNF agents in both AS and ERA further supports the role of pro-inflammatory cytokines in SpA (34, 35).

The elevated production of IL-6 as well as MMP3 from ERA patients at baseline as compared to adult axial SpA may indicate that the monocytes from ERA patients are more activated and this could be related to higher disease activity as reflected by presence of more active peripheral arthritis and enthesitis in ERA patients as compared to adult axial SpA. The real reason behind the difference in IL-6 production compared to IL-6 producing monocyte frequency in the patient subsets is difficult to explain. However, some other blood cells along with monocytes may have contributed to IL-6 production in WB cultures whereas in flow cytometry, we have assessed only the IL-6 producing monocyte frequency.

The present study also provides the data that endogenous ligands like MRP8/14 and TNC also activate monocytes in patients with adult axial SpA and ERA. Here again, monocytes from ERA patients showed a slightly higher response as compared to adult axial SpA. MRP8/14 has been observed to be expressed in monocytes and infiltrating neutrophils in the inflamed joints of JIA patients (36). Stimulation of PBMCs from healthy subjects with MRP8/14 has already been shown to cause production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (37). TNC promotes the recruitment of monocytes/macrophages to the site of inflammation (38). It also binds to TLR4 on monocyte/macrophages and causes production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in a dose dependent manner (39). These cytokines can induce production of TNC through an ‘auto amplification’ loop (40).

Endogenous ligands were less potent then LPS in stimulating monocytes. TNC has also been shown to elicit less potent cytokine response than LPS in macrophages (39). It is known that endogenous ligands like TNC enhance expression of extracellular matrix proteins which work towards tissue repair (41), whereas LPS activates several downstream signalling pathways, causing production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (42).

Increased production of MMP3 on stimulation with endogenous ligands suggests that MMP3 production could be another mechanism by which the activated monocytes cause joint damage. MMP3 is a potent protease which causes degradation of matrix as well as cartilage, leading to joint damage. Children suffering from ERA have increased levels of MMP3 in the serum (43).

We have shown that endogenous ligands induce pro-inflammatory response from monocytes in patients and it has been reported that both MRP8/14 and TNC levels are elevated in patients with ERA and AS (12, 13, 18, 21). We studied the production of these ligands on stimulation of monocytes and found that indeed, patients cells produced higher levels of TNC & MRP8/14 as compared to HC. MRP8/14 and TNC are produced by monocytes upon stimulation by microbes or stress (44, 45).

SFMC’s from both adult axial SpA and ERA patients had similar frequency of TNF producing monocytes after stimulation. However, the presence of higher IL-6 producing monocyte frequency from ERA patients than adult axial SpA post stimulation with endogenous ligands suggests that at the local site, the monocyte/macrophage lineage cells are more activated in ERA patients. This could be due to selective homing of activated cells in the synovium or their higher activation at local site due to excessive production of endogenous ligands. Indeed, levels of MRP8/14 in SF are higher than plasma in children with ERA (21).

The strength of this study includes a good sample size, validation of data using three methods, i.e., frequency of cytokine producing monocytes, cytokine levels in culture supernatants and mRNA quantification, and inclusion of SF samples. The limitations of this study are lack of healthy children control, significant disease duration at time of inclusion, use of glucocorticoids and MTX by a proportion of patients at the time of analysis. However, the abnormalities seen are similar in juvenile and adult SpA, suggesting that they are not influenced by the age of patients but are specific to the disease. Though glucocorticoids and MTX can affect cytokine production however, we did not find any difference in the two groups (data not shown). It would be ideal to study cytokine production by monocytes separated from WB. However, this requires a minimum of 15–20 ml blood to get 1.5–2 million monocytes which is difficult in children. Thus, monocyte response is mostly similar in ERA and adult axial SpA.

Conclusion

All this data suggests that ERA and adult axial SpA share a common pathogenesis and innate cells like monocytes play an important role by producing pro-inflammatory cytokines as well as endogenous TLR ligands and thus setting a self-perpetuating cycle of inflammation, the so called ‘auto-inflammation’. Therapies targeting TNC have shown positive results in immune inflammatory disease (46). This study is in line with the growing belief that differences between paediatric and adult-onset rheumatic diseases are minimal (47). This may also suggest that these two diseases are a continuum and may explain progression of one-third of patients with ERA into adult axial SpA later (16).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AS:

Ankylosing Spondylitis

ASAS:

Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society

BASDAI:

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index

cDNA:

Complementary DNA

DMARDs:

Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

ELISA:

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay

ERA:

Enthesitis Related Arthritis

GAPDH:

Glyceraldehyde dehydrogenase

HC:

Healthy Control

HLA-B27

Human Leukocyte Antigen-B27

IBP:

Inflammatory back pain

IL-17:

Interleukin-17

IL-23:

Interleukin-23

ILAR:

International League of Associations for Rheumatology

IL-6

Interleukin-6

JIA:

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis

JSpADA:

Juvenile Spondyloarthropathy Disease Activity Score

LPS

Lipopolysaccharide

MMP3:

Matrix metalloproteinase 3

MRP:

Myeloid Related Protein

MTX:

Methotrexate

PB:

Peripheral Blood

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

PG

Peptidoglycan

RBC:

Red blood cells

RNA:

Ribonucleic acid

RPMI:

Roswell park memorial institute

SF:

Synovial Fluid

SFMC:

Synovial Fluid Mononuclear Cells

SpA:

Spondyloarthropathy

SSC:

Side scatter

TLR:

Toll Like Receptor

TNC:

Tenascin-C

TNF:

Tumour necrosis factor

WB:

Whole blood

References

  1. Paramarta JE, Baeten D. Spondyloarthritis: from unifying concepts to improved treatment. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(9):1547–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schlosstein L, Terasaki PI, Bluestone R, Pearson CM. High association of an HL-A antigen, W27, with ankylosing spondylitis. N Engl J Med. 1973;288(14):704–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Simone D, Al Mossawi MH, Bowness P. Progress in our understanding of the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(suppl_6):vi4–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fragoulis GE, Liava C, Daoussis D, Akriviadis E, Garyfallos A, Dimitroulas T. Inflammatory bowel diseases and spondyloarthropathies: from pathogenesis to treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(18):2162–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Romero-Sanchez C, Bautista-Molano W, Parra V, De Avila J, Rueda JC, Bello-Gualtero JM, et al. Gastrointestinal symptoms and elevated levels of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies are associated with higher disease activity in Colombian patients with Spondyloarthritis. Int J Rheumatol. 2017;2017:4029584.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rizzo A, Guggino G, Ferrante A, Ciccia F. Role of Subclinical Gut Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Spondyloarthritis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018;5:63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodall JC, Ellis L, Yeo GS, Gaston JS. Does HLA-B27 influence the monocyte inflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46(2):232–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Myles A, Aggarwal A. Expression of toll-like receptors 2 and 4 is increased in peripheral blood and synovial fluid monocytes of patients with enthesitis-related arthritis subtype of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(3):481–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lamot L, Borovecki F, Tambic Bukovac L, Vidovic M, Perica M, Gotovac K, et al. Aberrant expression of shared master-key genes contributes to the immunopathogenesis in patients with juvenile spondyloarthritis. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e115416.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zeng L, Lindstrom MJ, Smith JA. Ankylosing spondylitis macrophage production of higher levels of interleukin-23 in response to lipopolysaccharide without induction of a significant unfolded protein response. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(12):3807–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wright C, Edelmann M. diGleria K, Kollnberger S, Kramer H, McGowan S, et al. Ankylosing spondylitis monocytes show upregulation of proteins involved in inflammation and the ubiquitin proteasome pathway. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(10):1626–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta L, Bhattacharya S, Aggarwal A. Tenascin-C, a biomarker of disease activity in early ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol. 2018;37(5):1401–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta L, Bhattacharya S, Agarwal V, Aggarwal A. Elevated levels of serum MRP8/14 in ankylosing spondylitis: associated with peripheral arthritis and active disease. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35(12):3075–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mistry RR, Patro P, Agarwal V, Misra DP. Enthesitis-related arthritis: current perspectives. Open Access Rheumatol. 2019;11:19–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Srivastava R, Agnihotry S, Aggarwal R, Bajpai P, Aggarwal A. HLA-B27 subtypes in enthesitis-related arthritis category of juvenile idiopathic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis in northern India. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015;33(6):931–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Flato B, Hoffmann-Vold AM, Reiff A, Forre O, Lien G, Vinje O. Long-term outcome and prognostic factors in enthesitis-related arthritis: a case-control study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(11):3573–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gonzalez T, Malagon C, Guarnizo P, Mosquera AC, Chila-Moreno L, Romero-Sanchez C. Autoantibodies and gastrointestinal symptoms in Colombian children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2018;14(2):163–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shukla A, Gaur P, Aggarwal A. Tenascin-C levels, a toll-like receptor 4 ligand, in Enthesitis-related arthritis category of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(5):891–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stoll ML, Punaro M, Patel AS. Fecal calprotectin in children with the enthesitis-related arthritis subtype of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(10):2274–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Aggarwal A, Sarangi AN, Gaur P, Shukla A, Aggarwal R. Gut microbiome in children with enthesitis-related arthritis in a developing country and the effect of probiotic administration. Clin Exp Immunol. 2017;187(3):480–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rahman MT, Myles A, Gaur P, Misra R, Aggarwal A. TLR4 endogenous ligand MRP8/14 level in enthesitis-related arthritis and its association with disease activity and TLR4 expression. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(2):270–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Saxena N, Aggarwal A, Misra R. Elevated concentrations of monocyte derived cytokines in synovial fluid of children with enthesitis related arthritis and polyarticular types of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(7):1349–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Duarte AP, Marques CD, Bortoluzzo AB, Goncalves CR, da Silva JA, Ximenes AC, et al. Epidemiologic profile of juvenile-onset compared to adult-onset spondyloarthritis in a large Brazilian cohort. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2014;54(6):424–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin YC, Liang TH, Chen WS, Lin HY. Differences between juvenile-onset ankylosing spondylitis and adult-onset ankylosing spondylitis. J Chin Med Assoc. 2009;72(11):573–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Akkoc N, Brandt J, Chou CT, et al. The assessment of SpondyloArthritis international society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(1):25–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, Baum J, Glass DN, Goldenberg J, et al. International league of associations for rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(2):390–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index. J Rheumatol. 1994;21(12):2286–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weiss PF, Colbert RA, Xiao R, Feudtner C, Beukelman T, DeWitt EM, et al. Development and retrospective validation of the juvenile spondyloarthritis disease activity index. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66(12):1775–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Conrad K, Wu P, Sieper J, Syrbe U. In vivo pre-activation of monocytes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gerards AH, de Lathouder S, de Groot ER, Dijkmans BA, Aarden LA. Inhibition of cytokine production by methotrexate. Studies in healthy volunteers and patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003;42(10):1189–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Steer JH, Vuong Q, Joyce DA. Suppression of human monocyte tumour necrosis factor-alpha release by glucocorticoid therapy: relationship to systemic monocytopaenia and cortisol suppression. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;43(4):383–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu W, Wu YH, Zhang L, Liu XY, Xue B, Wang Y, et al. Elevated serum levels of IL-6 and IL-17 may associate with the development of ankylosing spondylitis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(10):17362–76.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Romero-Sanchez C, Jaimes DA, Londono J, De Avila J, Castellanos JE, Bello JM, et al. Association between Th-17 cytokine profile and clinical features in patients with spondyloarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011;29(5):828–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tse SM, Laxer RM, Babyn PS, Doria AS. Radiologic improvement of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-enthesitis-related arthritis following anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha blockade with etanercept. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(6):1186–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Coates LC, Marzo-Ortega H, Bennett AN, Emery P. Anti-TNF therapy in Ankylosing spondylitis: insights for the clinician. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2010;2(1):37–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Holzinger D, Tenbrock K, Roth J. Alarmins of the S100-family in juvenile autoimmune and auto-inflammatory diseases. Front Immunol. 2019;10:182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee DG, Woo JW, Kwok SK, Cho ML, Park SH. MRP8 promotes Th17 differentiation via upregulation of IL-6 production by fibroblast-like synoviocytes in rheumatoid arthritis. Exp Mol Med. 2013;45:e20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Abbadi D, Laroumanie F, Bizou M, Pozzo J, Daviaud D, Delage C, et al. Local production of tenascin-C acts as a trigger for monocyte/macrophage recruitment that provokes cardiac dysfunction. Cardiovasc Res. 2018;114(1):123–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Midwood K, Sacre S, Piccinini AM, Inglis J, Trebaul A, Chan E, et al. Tenascin-C is an endogenous activator of toll-like receptor 4 that is essential for maintaining inflammation in arthritic joint disease. Nat Med. 2009;15(7):774–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Goh FG, Piccinini AM, Krausgruber T, Udalova IA, Midwood KS. Transcriptional regulation of the endogenous danger signal tenascin-C: a novel autocrine loop in inflammation. J Immunol. 2010;184(5):2655–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Marzeda AM, Midwood KS. Internal affairs: Tenascin-C as a clinically relevant, endogenous driver of innate immunity. J Histochem Cytochem. 2018;66(4):289–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Wei S, Yang D, Yang J, Zhang X, Zhang J, Fu J, et al. Overexpression of toll-like receptor 4 enhances LPS-induced inflammatory response and inhibits Salmonella Typhimurium growth in ovine macrophages. Eur J Cell Biol. 2019;98(1):36–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Viswanath V, Myles A, Dayal R, Aggarwal A. Levels of serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 correlate with disease activity in the enthesitis-related arthritis category of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(11):2482–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vogl T, Tenbrock K, Ludwig S, Leukert N, Ehrhardt C, van Zoelen MA, et al. Mrp8 and Mrp14 are endogenous activators of toll-like receptor 4, promoting lethal, endotoxin-induced shock. Nat Med. 2007;13(9):1042–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Chockalingam PS, Glasson SS, Lohmander LS. Tenascin-C levels in synovial fluid are elevated after injury to the human and canine joint and correlate with markers of inflammation and matrix degradation. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21(2):339–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Page TH, Charles PJ, Piccinini AM, Nicolaidou V, Taylor PC, Midwood KS. Raised circulating tenascin-C in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14(6):R260.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Nigrovic PA, Raychaudhuri S, Thompson SD. Review: genetics and the classification of arthritis in adults and children. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(1):7–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the residents of our department for their help in collection of patient samples.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from Department of Science and Technology to AA. SB was supported by Senior Research Fellowship grant from Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India

    Shruti Bhattacharya, Ramnath Misra & Amita Aggarwal

Authors
  1. Shruti Bhattacharya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ramnath Misra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amita Aggarwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SB participated in the study design, carried out the experiments, performed data analysis and drafted the manuscript. RNM was involved in the conception of the study as well as study design, and revised the manuscript. AA conceived the study, participated in the study design, revised and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amita Aggarwal.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was taken from all subjects. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (2015–61-EMP-EXP dated 06 May 2015).

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Gating strategy for flow cytometry analysis. Demonstration of gating strategy for flow cytometric analysis of CD14 monocytes from PB and SFMC samples. In this example, 500 μl PB (from HC) + 500 μl cRPMI was left unstimulated for 4 h with brefildin A. the cells were then surface stained with CD14 (FITC) monoclonal antibody and IL-6 (APC) and TNF (PE) intracellular monoclonal antibodies. The CD14+ monocytes were gated on the SSC vs CD14-FITC plot. The monocytes were then analysed for CD14+TNF+ cells and CD14+IL-6+ cells. The gating was done on the basis of lymphocyte exclusion method of flow cytometry analysis.

Additional file 2.

TNF+ and IL-6+ monocytes after stimulation with TLR ligands (LPS, PG, TNC and MRP8) in PB in patients and HC. Table showing the frequency of TNF and IL-6 producing monocytes on stimulation with endogenous (LPS and TNC) and exogenous (TNC and MRP8) TLR ligands in SpA, ERA patients and HC. WB diluted 1:1 with complete culture medium was used.

Additional file 3.

MMP3, TNF and IL-6 production after stimulation with TLR ligands (LPS, PG, TNC and MRP8) in patients and HC. Table showing the level of TNF, IL-6 and MMP3 production on stimulation with endogenous (LPS and TNC) and exogenous (TNC and MRP8) TLR ligands in SpA, ERA patients and HC. WB diluted 1:1 with complete culture medium was used.

Additional file 4

TNF and IL-6 mRNA fold change (PB) in HC, SpA and ERA patients. Scatter plots representing TNF and IL-6 mRNA fold change in PB in three group of subjects, HC (5), SpA (5) and ERA (5) patients as measured via quantitative PCR Each dot represents an individual sample. Horizontal line represents mean. Fold change =2-ΔΔCt and ΔΔCt = [Ct(TNF/IL-6)-CtGAPDH] stimulated sample (LPS/TNC/MRP8) - [Ct(TNF/IL-6)-CtGAPDH unstimulated sample. TNF mRNA fold change in response to (A). LPS stimulation (B). TNC stimulation (C). MRP8 stimulation. IL-6 mRNA fold change in response to (D). LPS stimulation (E). TNC stimulation (F). MRP8 stimulation. WB diluted 1:1 with complete culture medium was used. HC: healthy controls, SpA: Spondyloarthropathy, ERA: enthesitis related arthritis, Uns- unstimulated, LPS- Lipopolysaccaride, PG- peptidoglycan, TNC- Tenascin-C and MRP8-Myeloid related protein 8, TNF: tumor necrosis factor, IL-6: Interleukin-6.

Additional file 5.

TNC and MRP8/14 production after stimulation with LPS in patients and HC. Table showing the level of TNC and MRP8 production on stimulation with endogenous (LPS) TLR4 ligand in SpA, ERA patients and HC. WB diluted 1:1 with complete culture medium was used.

Additional file 6.

TNF+ and IL-6+ monocytes after stimulation with TLR ligands (LPS, PG, TNC and MRP8) in SFMC in SpA and ERA patients. Table showing the frequency of TNF and IL-6 producing monocytes on stimulation with endogenous (LPS and TNC) and exogenous (TNC and MRP8) TLR ligands in SpA and ERA patients. 106 SFMC/ml in complete culture medium was used.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhattacharya, S., Misra, R. & Aggarwal, A. Patients with enthesitis related arthritis show similar monocyte function pattern as seen in adult axial spondyloarthropathy. Pediatr Rheumatol 18, 6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-020-0403-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-020-0403-9

Keywords

Pediatric Rheumatology

ISSN: 1546-0096