Skip to main content

Assessment of disease activity using a whole-body MRI derived radiological activity index in chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis

Abstract

Background

Based on the recently developed ChRonic nonbacterial Osteomyelitis MRI Scoring tool (CROMRIS), we developed a radiological activity index (RAI-CROMRIS) to obtain a quantification of the overall bone involvement in individual patients.

Methods

Whole Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging (WB-MRI) images were scored according to parameters included in the RAI-CROMRIS: bone marrow hyperintensity, signal extension, soft tissue/periosteal hyperintensity, bony expansion, vertebral collapse. These parameters were evaluated for each bone unit yielding a score from 0 to 7 and summed up as RAI-CROMRIS including all bone units. We assessed clinical disease activity using a physician global assessment (PGA) and radiological findings in 76 treatment-naïve patients; 46 of 76 were evaluated at 6 and 12 months after initial WB-MRI. Quantitative variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test for unmatched groups and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired groups. Correlation was evaluated using Spearman’s rank coefficient (rs).

Results

There was a significant correlation between RAI-CROMRIS and PGA (rs = 0.32; p = 0.0055), between RAI-CROMRIS and presence of elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p = 0.013) and C-reactive protein (p = 0.0001) at baseline. The RAI-CROMRIS decreased from a median of 17 at baseline to 12 at 6 months (p = 0.004) and remained stable (median 11) at 12 months. A correlation between the RAI-CROMRIS and the PGA was observed at baseline (rs = 0.41; p = 0.004) and during follow up at 6 months (rs = 0.33; p = 0.025) and 12 months (rs = 0.38; p = 0.010). The baseline RAI-CROMRIS (median 20) was significantly higher in patients who subsequently received bisphosphonates than in patients who received other treatments (median 12) and decreased significantly after bisphosphonates (p = 0.008).

Conclusions

The RAI-CROMRIS was correlated with clinical and laboratory measures of disease activity showing significant short-term changes following treatment with bisphosphonates. This tool could be used in clinical practice and clinical trials after validation.

Background

Chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) is an autoinflammatory bone disease, characterized by sterile bone lesions due to an abnormal regulation of the innate immune response resulting in osteoclast differentiation and activation, osteolysis and bone remodeling [1, 2]. It was first described in 1972 as an unusual form of subacute and chronic symmetrical osteomyelitis [3]. Nowadays the term chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis is preferred [4, 5].

Incidence rate of CNO varies 1–4 per million children from different reports [6] and an incidence of approximately 1:1,000,000 [7] or 2–5% of all osteomyelitis cases [8]. However, this may be underestimated due to low awareness. The average age of onset ranges between 7 and 12 years [4, 9] with a preference for the female gender [9, 10]. The disease is characterized by bone inflammation. The etiopathogenesis still remains unclear. It is believed to be polygenic and multifactorial leading to an imbalanced expression of anti-inflammatory/immunomodulating (IL-10 and IL-19) and proinflammatory (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-20) cytokines [2, 11, 12].

Clinical presentation and severity of CNO vary significantly from asymptomatic subjects at one end to patients with multiple recurrent lesions with significant functional impact at the other end [13, 14]. The cardinal feature is bone pain. Onset is often insidious and patients may or may not experience concomitant systemic symptoms including low-grade fever and generalized malaise [9, 15]. About 30% of patients had unifocal disease at diagnosis but most of them developed new lesions during the follow-up period [16]. Only 25–40% of individuals have symmetrical bone involvement [4]. Finally, a subset of CNO patients exhibit extra-osseous inflammatory organ involvement, including psoriasis and palmoplantar pustulosis (~ 8%), severe acne (~ 10%) and inflammatory bowel disease (~ 10%) [13, 14, 16, 17].

The diagnosis of CNO still remains a diagnosis of exclusion and a bone biopsy is often advocated to confirm the diseases. Imaging is becoming increasingly important in the diagnosis and follow-up of these patients [18, 19]. Inflammatory lesions in CNO may be detected by conventional radiographs with low sensitivity [20]. Computed tomography (CT) may show lytic lesion and sclerosis at a higher sensitivity than radiograph in CNO. Its use is limited due to the high radiation dose. Bone scintigraphy and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT are sometimes used to offer a whole-body level assessment in order to identify lesions simultaneously [21]. However, both are radiation-based techniques. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) represents the current gold standard in the diagnosis and management of CNO patients. It allows the assessment of multiple affected sites simultaneously through typical findings of marrow edema (hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images, or short tau inverse recovery [STIR] during the active phase of the disease) [22, 23]. MRI can also demonstrate associated periosteal reaction, soft tissue inflammation and transphyseal disease. In addition, clinically asymptomatic lesions, also known as “silent” lesions, can often be detected by MRI. WB-MRI is radiation-free and well suited for surveillance and monitoring of therapeutic response; however it requires sedation in younger children.

Recently the ChRonic nonbacterial Osteomyelitis MRI Scoring (CROMRIS) was developed as a standardized evaluation tool of WB-MRI by an international group of pediatric radiologists [24]. It includes the most commonly described characteristics seen in children with CNO from MRI, such as signal intensity, size of signal abnormality within bone marrow, and associated features on MRI. Grading of severity of the findings was discussed by 11 pediatric radiologists through monthly conference calls and a consensus meeting and an atlas was created.

Based on this tool, we developed a radiological activity index (RAI-CROMRIS) to obtain a quantitative measure of bone involvement at multiple sites in individual patients with the aim to measure the “entire radiological burden” of the disease at a whole-body level.

Material and methods

Patients

We retrospectively analyzed 76 patients with CNO followed at the division of Rheumatology of “Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù” from April 2012 to September 2019. Inclusion criteria were: fulfilling the CNO criteria proposed by Jansson et al. [25] and WB-MRI performed at baseline, before starting any specific treatment. Complete clinical data were collected as described below.

Clinical disease activity was evaluated using a physician’s global assessment (PGA), based on a 5-point scoring system (inactive, minimal, mild, moderate, severe disease) that included fever, increase of inflammatory markers, presence of pain and/or functional impairment and physician visual analogue scale (VAS) modified from what described in Pardeo et al. [26] (Table 1). The intensity of pain was assessed by the clinician on a VAS ranging from 0 to 10, with 0 as no pain and 10 as maximum pain. Normal ranges used for laboratory data were as follows: C-reactive protein (CRP) < 0.5 mg/dl and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≤15 mm/h. These clinical data were collected for all patients with baseline WB-MRI as well as those who had WB-MRI at follow up.

Table 1 Physician’s global assessment (PGA) scoring system

Whole body MRI protocol and scoring

The WB-MRI protocol is available in Additional Table A1. All studies were performed on a 1.5 T AERA MR scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). A baseline MRI was available for all patients (MRI T0). A WB-MRI was also available at 6 months (MRI T6) and at 12 months (MRI T12) for 46 patients after starting therapy. MRI images were reviewed on a dedicated PACS workstation by two radiologists in consensus reading, with respectively 2 years and 10 years of experience in pediatric radiology. Readers were blinded to patients clinical, history and laboratory data. WB-MRI images were assessed using the CROMRIS as published by Zhao et al. [24] (Additional Table A2). The CROMRIS atlas included evaluation of all bone units (the entire skeleton was divided into long bones, complex bones, hand/foot and spine) using 4 different variables: bone marrow hyperintensity, size of signal intensity within each unit/segment graded using relative measurement (small defined as < 25% of estimated volume, medium as 25–50% and large > 50% of estimated volume), hyperintensity of surrounding tissue and bony expansion. Our RAI-CROMRIS include the following parameters for only active CNO lesions: 1) presence of bone marrow hyperintensity on STIR images (score 0–1); 2) presence of signal extension (score 1–3); 3) presence of soft tissue/periosteal hyperintensity (score 0–1); 4) presence of bony expansion (score 0–1); 5) presence of vertebral collapse (score 0–1) and the total score from all active CNO lesions were summed up as the final score on the whole body level. The maximum score for each bone unit is 7 (Table 2). The minimum score for each identified bone unit is 2 as the presence of bone marrow hyperintensity. The RAI-CROMRIS was a practical adaptation of converting a scoring system for individual bones into a quantitative whole-body score for research use. Joint effusion (synovitis), and measures of damage/complications, such as non-CNO bony abnormalities, limb hypertrophy, kyphosis, bony expansion without bone edema and pathological fractures were excluded from the index developed here.

Table 2 RAI-CROMRIS

The RAI-CROMRIS was calculated for all 76 patients who had a WB-MRI at baseline and for all the 46 patients who had WB-MRI at 6 and 12 months. All the patients had complete clinical and laboratory data. An example of whole-body MRI and of the calculation of the RAI-CROMRIS of a patient is shown in Additional Figure A1.

Statistical analysis

Qualitative variables were expressed as absolute frequency and percentage. Proportions were compared by Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Quantitative variables, reported as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR: 1st-3rd quartile), were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test for unmatched groups and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired groups.

Correlation between quantitative variables was evaluated using Spearman’s rank coefficient (rs) and the strength of the correlation were classified as follows: rs   < 0.40 = weak, 0.40–0.59 = moderate, 0.60–0.79 = strong and ≥ 0.80 = very strong [27].

All statistical tests were two-sided; a p value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The analyses and graphs were performed using Stata 15.1 software (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas USA, 2017).

Results

Demographic data, clinical and radiological findings at baseline

The demographic and baseline characteristics of patients are shown in Table 3. We evaluated 76 patients (48 females) with a median age at disease onset of 10.3 years with an overall disease duration of approximately 6 months. At baseline, 75 patients had pain, 33 had functional impairment and 8 had fever. Our patients presented with a median of VAS pain of 5 (IQR 4–6) and had mild disease activity as shown by a median of PGA of 2.0 (IQR 1.5–3.0) on a 5-point scale scoring system. Increased inflammatory markers (ESR and/or CRP) were present in approximately half of the patients.

Table 3 Demographic and baseline characteristics of the 76 patients

By WB-MRI, the median number of affected bone units was 6 (IQR 3–9) and the median value of the RAI-CROMRIS was 14 (IQR 8–24) (Table 3). The number and distribution of bone lesions in the baseline WB-MRI are shown in Additional Figure A2.

Correlation of the RAI-CROMRIS with clinical and laboratory parameters

Of the 76 patients, 41 were treated with bisphosphonates; among these 28 patients received bisphosphonates monotherapy, 5 patients received concomitant sulfasalazine (SSZ) and/or methotrexate (MTX), 6 patients received biologic agents (tumor-necrosis factor inhibitors, or interleukin-1 inhibitor) and 2 patients received a combination of disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs (DMARDS, SSZ and/or MTX) and biologic agents.

In the group of patients who did not receive bisphosphonates therapy (35/76): 16 patients have been treated with only nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), 15 patients received SSZ and/or MTX, 1 patient received biologic agents, 3 patients received SSZ and/or MTX with concomitant biological therapy.

At baseline, we found a significant, but weak, correlation between the RAI-CROMRIS and the PGA (rs = 0.32; p = 0.0055) (Fig. 1A). We also found a significant association of the RAI-CROMRIS with the presence of functional impairment, and with ESR and CRP above the upper limits of normal (Fig. 1B, C and D, respectively). No association of the RAI-CROMRIS was found with presence of fever (temperature ≥ 38 °C) and physician VAS > 5.

Fig. 1
figure1

Relationship of the RAI-CROMRIS with clinical and laboratory parameters at baseline. In the 76 patients was analysed the relationship of the RAI-CROMRIS with PGA (A), with the presence of functional impairment (B), with ESR (C) and CRP (D). In A the Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rs) is shown. In B, C and D the p-value was calculated with the Mann-Whitney U test

Subsequently, we analyzed the clinical and radiological characteristics of the 46 patients followed for 12 months. The 46 subjects were mainly females (29/46, 63%) with a median age at disease onset of 10.2 years (IQR 8.0–12.0) and a median duration of disease at diagnosis of 5.3 months (IQR 2.3–13.1). Disease features are shown in Additional Table A3. The PGA and physician VAS showed a decreasing trend after 6 months from baseline (p < 0.0001) and remained substantially stable at 12 months (p = 0.65 and p = 0.45 versus values at 6 months, respectively) (Additional Table A3). CRP was normal at 6 months and at 12 months in the great majority of patients.

The RAI-CROMRIS decreased from a median of 17 at baseline (IQR 12–26) to a median of 12 at 6 months (IQR 6–20; p = 0.004) and remained stable at a median of 11 at 12 months (IQR 4–20; T12 vs baseline p = 0.003 and T12 vs T6 p = 0.52) (Fig. 2A). The distribution of the PGA scores and the relation with the RAI-CROMRIS at different time points is shown in Fig. 2B. A significant correlation between the RAI-CROMRIS and the PGA was observed at baseline and during follow up with a moderate correlation at baseline (rs = 0.41, p = 0.004) and a weak correlation at 6 months (rs = 0.33, p = 0.025) and at 12 months (rs = 0.38, p = 0.010). We also found that the changes in the RAI-CROMRIS from baseline to 12 months were significantly associated with the changes in the PGA (rs= 0.43, p = 0.003).

Fig. 2
figure2

RAI-CROMRIS and relationship with PGA during follow up. The changes in the RAI-CROMRIS during follow-up (A) and the relationship with PGA (B) of the 46 patients who have MRI at baseline, 6 months and 12 months were evaluated. T0 = baseline, T6 = 6 months, T12 = 12 months

RAI-CROMRIS at baseline and at 6 months in patients treated with bisphosphonates

As the optimal treatment of CNO has not yet been established, the therapeutic choices for CNO patients are driven by the treating physician’s judgement. Bisphosphonates are usually proposed in current treatment plans for more severe patients [28]. We retrospectively compared RAI-CROMRIS values at baseline and changes at 6 months in patients who received bisphosphonates (n = 27) with those who did not (n = 19). We found that patients who subsequently received bisphosphonates had higher baseline RAI-CROMRIS compared to patients who received other treatments (median 20, IQR 13–42 vs. median 12, IQR 8–18; p = 0.008).

In the patients who received bisphosphonate PGA decreased from a median of 2 (range 1–4) to a median of 1 (range 0–3) and the percentage of patients with abnormal ESR and/or CRP changed from 51.9 to 25.9% and from 59.3 to 11.1%, respectively. A decrease of the RAI-CROMRIS was observed from a median of 20 at baseline (IQR 13–42, range 3–51) to a median of 15 at 6 months (IQR 4–25, range 0–54) (p = 0.003 by paired test) (Fig. 3A). The decrease in the score was particularly evident for extension of bone hyperintensity (T0: median = 11, IQR = 8–25, range = 1–32; T6: median = 9, IQR = 2–14, range = 0–32; p = 0.0027 by paired test) (Fig. 3B). In addition, the soft tissue hyperintensity observed at baseline in 7 patients, resolved in 5, and persisted in 2 patients at 6 months.

Fig. 3
figure3

RAI-CROMRIS at baseline and at 6 months in patients treated with bisphosphonates. The distribution of RAI-CROMRIS values (A) and of the extension of bone hyperintensity (B) at baseline and at 6 months in 27 patients who received bisphosphonates with MRI at baseline (T0) and at 6 months (T6) were analysed

Discussion

Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) is one of the mainstays in the diagnosis and management of CNO patients. It is becoming the imaging modality of choice because of its sensitivity in detecting lesions and their characteristic pattern, as well as clinically silent lesions, without ionizing radiation [29]. However, the issue of appropriate interpretation, particularly in children growing bones, has led a number of investigators to propose standardized MRI protocols and scoring systems with the aims to improve reproducibility and inter-examiner variability and, ultimately, diagnosis and staging of the disease [30, 31]. Some of the available scoring systems have shown merits, but also some limitations and they have not been validated. One is an MRI score system for the osteitis lesions used in patients who met the criteria for SAPHO syndrome (Synovitis, Acne, Pustulosis, Hyperostosis, Osteitis syndrome). This score ranges from 0 to 2 with score 0 defined as no bone marrow edema, osteal erosions or synovitis (with or without joint effusion); score 1 defined as the presence of one of these findings; and score 2 defined as the presence of 2 or more findings. In case of more than one osteitis lesion, the lesion with the highest score was used as reference for that patient [30, 32]. In the RINBO index, points are assigned for each of four parameters of interest: the number of radiologic active lesions clustered into 3 categories as unifocal, paucifocal [2–4 lesions] and multifocal [5 or more lesions], the diameter of the largest lesion, the presence of extra medullary involvement, the presence of spinal involvement [33]. Differently from the previous score, the RINBO generates a total score summing the score of the lesions. The main limitation is that the measurement of the size of lesions is not reported as relative to the size of each bone, which is more appropriate, particularly, in children.

We chose to use as a basis of a global quantitative radiological assessment the CROMRIS, a standardized grading of the different features of CNO lesions, irrespective of the bone involved, recently designed by Zhao et al. [24]. It is based on CNO features previously used to score region-specific MRI [31], but with modifications developed, through a consensus process, by 11 pediatric experienced radiologists from 7 different centers and 2 continents (North America and Europe). These authors produced, after a literature review, a complete atlas that consists of detailed definitions and grading of signal intensity, size of signal abnormality within bone marrow and surrounding tissue, physis damage and vertebral compression for each individual bone unit. This method showed excellent reliability and agreement in each category of bones and moderate to substantial reliability and agreement in readings from individual bones [24]. This score was designed to be easily applied in settings with non-experienced radiologists. Therefore, the CROMRIS represents an excellent standardized semi-quantitative scoring system [24]. A total score reflecting the radiological activity of each individual patient has not been proposed. A total score taking all lesions into account is needed because the fluctuating course of CNO implies that new lesions may occur while others are vanishing. Hence, we chose to integrate scores from each bone unit in a comprehensive RAI-CROMRIS that could measure the “entire radiological burden” of the disease at a whole-body level.

Few studies with small cohorts addressed the direct correlation between radiological and clinical findings in CNO patients. A comparison of clinical and radiological findings was previously performed in small cohort without a quantitative radiological score [34, 35]. More recently, the RINBO score was evaluated in 40 patients and found to have a fair agreement with the clinical evaluation of each bone site; however, patients’ medication and follow-up scans were not taken into account [33]. In our study we evaluated the correlation of the RAI-CROMRIS with disease activity in 76 patients before starting treatment and in 46 patients also at two subsequent time points (6 and 12 months). We found a significant association of the RAI-CROMRIS with disease activity parameters including the PGA, presence of functional impairment and increased inflammatory markers in patients at baseline. These observations suggest that the burden of radiological activity, as measured by the RAI-CROMRIS, reflects the overall degree of clinical activity of each individual patient. Examining 46 patients with WB-MRI at baseline and at 6 and 12 months, we found a significant decrease in the RAI-CROMRIS overtime. Importantly, a correlation between the RAI-CROMRIS and the PGA was observed, not only at baseline, but also during follow up at 6 and 12 months, at times when the disease activity was significantly lower, suggesting that this score may be able to reflect minor changes in disease activity.

Several studies have shown the effectiveness of bisphosphonates as a treatment option for patients with significant disease burden, with physical limitations or active vertebral lesions or in those who have persistently active symptoms and abnormal MRI findings who have failed others treatment (NSAID, DMARDS, biologic agents) [28, 31, 36, 37]. This is reflected by the recently developed consensus treatment plans [28]. The patients whom we chose to treat with bisphosphonates, not only had a more severe disease (as shown by more frequent functional impairment and more frequent vertebral involvement), but also had a significantly higher baseline RAI-CROMRIS compared to patients who received other treatments. After 6 months of treatment, the improvement in disease activity was associated with a significant decrease in the RAI-CROMRIS. The decrease in the score was particularly evident for extension of bone hyperintensity, as well as for soft tissue hyperintensity. As hyperintensity is indicative of inflammatory edema, this observation is consistent with the hypothesis of an anti-inflammatory effects of targeting osteoclasts in CNO.

There is no guideline of how frequently whole-body MRI needs to be performed in CNO patients. In the CARRA consensus treatment plan, MRI is strongly recommended to objectively assess disease activity at 6 and 12 months after adjusting therapy [28]. The timing of MRI in this work follows the consensus reached by the CARRA investigators.

There are some limitations of our study. Even if our series is large, the monocentric nature of the study, its observational design, the heterogeneity of the treatments used and the rather long time interval in which the patients were enrolled require caution in drawing definitive conclusions. Although we have used a comprehensive PGA including different variables, such as physician reported outcome, patient reported outcome and increase in acute phase markers, this is not validated. Indeed, there is not yet an internationally validated tool for measuring disease activity in CNO. It should also be noted that bone hyperintensity on STIR sequences may be present in healthy children during growth and, therefore differentiating this physiological hyperintensity from the pathological inflammatory oedema of CNO may be challenging [38]. Bone-marrow-edema like changes in the hand skeleton are reported in healthy children aged 5–16 years in the hand skeleton [39, 40], as well as in feet [41] and pelvis [38]. The low prevalence of bone hyperintensity within these sites in our cohort and the relevant change after treatment argue against over-reading. Further studies are warranted to compare the minimal changes detected in children with CNO with those from healthy children in order to identify the key difference that would be specific to active disease in CNO and to determine the minimum clinically significant difference of MRI findings by using external validation measurements [42].

Furthermore, a potential limitation of the CROMRIS is that the parameters, except extension of hyperintensity in each bone unit, have the same scoring range, which may have diluted an important variable. Also all bone units were considered equally, though hands bones and foot bones were grouped together and assigned the same unbiased weight. Whether these issues are relevant in the evaluation of the total radiological burden of disease and its relation to clinical disease activity remains to be established. Our study provides follow-up information up to 1 year, which is informative on the short term, but longer-term follow-up is needed in a chronic relapsing disease such as CNO. Radiological follow-up studies are lacking. In the only available follow-up study WB-MRI performed more than 10 years after disease onset, revealed radiologically active lesions in more than 50% of patients even in long-term clinical remission [35].

Conclusions

In conclusion, our results show that the RAI-CROMRIS provides a measure of the overall radiological burden of disease in individual CNO patients and that it is related to clinical and laboratory measures of disease activity, as well as shows significant short-term changes following treatment with bisphosphonates. Larger studies, ideally multicentric, are needed to evaluate the usefulness of the RAI-CROMRIS to stratify patients with CNO based on the severity of the disease, and consequently to guide the most appropriate therapeutic choice, and to evaluate its sensitivity to change following treatments. This radiological score could be included in clinical trials aimed to evaluate the efficacy of targeted treatments in CNO.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CNO:

Chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis

CROMRIS:

ChRonic nonbacterial Osteomyelitis MRI Scoring tool

CRP:

C-reactive protein

DMARDS:

Disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs

ESR:

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

MTX:

Methotrexate

NSAIDs:

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

PET-CT:

Positron emission-computed tomography

PGA:

Physician global assessment

RAI-CROMRIS:

Radiological Activity Index-ChRonic nonbacterial Osteomyelitis MRI Scoring tool

RINBO:

Radiological index non-bacterial osteomyelitis

SAPHO syndrome:

Synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, osteitis syndrome

STIR:

Short tau inverse recovery

SSZ:

Sulfasalazine

VAS:

Visual analogue scale

WB-MRI:

Whole body magnetic resonance imaging

References

  1. 1.

    Stern SM, Ferguson PJ. Autoinflammatory bone diseases. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 2013;39(4):735–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2013.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hedrich CM, Hofmann SR, Pablik J, Morbach H, Girschick HJ. Autoinflammatory bone disorders with special focus on chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO). Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2013;11(1):47. https://doi.org/10.1186/1546-0096-11-47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Giedion A, Holthusen W, Masel LF, Vischer D. Subacute and chronic “symmetrical” osteomyelitis. Ann Radiol. 1972;15:329–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jansson A, Renner ED, Ramser J, Mayer A, Haban M, Meindl A, et al. Classification of non-bacterial osteitis: retrospective study of clinical, immunological and genetic aspects in 89 patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46(1):154–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kel190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jurik AG, Helmig O, Ternowitz T, Møller BN. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: a follow-up study. J Pediatr Orthop. 1988;8(1):49–58. https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-198801000-00012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chen Z, Cheng L, Feng G. Bone inflammation and chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22(5):1380–6. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_201803_14482.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Alshammari A, Usmani S, Elgazzar AH, Ashkanani RA. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis in children: a multidisciplinary approach is needed to establish a diagnosis. World J Nucl Med. 2013;12(3):120–3. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.136737.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Deogaonkar K, Ghandour A, Jones A, Ahuja S, Lyons K. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis presenting as acute scoliosis: a case report and review of literature. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(Suppl 2):S248–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0516-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Girschick H, Finetti M, Orlando F, Schalm S, Insalaco A, Ganser G, et al. The multifaceted presentation of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: a series of 486 cases from the Eurofever international registry. Rheumatology. 2018;57(8):1504–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/key058.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Silier CCG, Greshik J, Gesell S, Grote V, Jansson AF. Chronic non-bacterial osteitis from the patient perspective: a health services research through data collected from patient conferences. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e017599. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017599.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hofmann SR, Kapplusch F, Mäbert K, Hedrich CM. The molecular pathophysiology of chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) - a systematic review. Mol Cell Pediatr. 2017;4(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40348-017-0073-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Scianaro R, Insalaco A, Bracci Laudiero L, De Vito R, Pezzullo M, Teti A, et al. Deregulation of the IL-1beta axis in chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2014;12(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1546-0096-12-30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Walsh P, Manners PJ, Veroce J, Burgner D, Murray KJ. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis in children: nine years’ experience at a statewide tertiary paediatric rheumatology referral Centre. Rheumatology. 2015;54(9):1688–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kev013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Schnabel A, Range U, Hahn G, Siepmann T, Berner R, Hedrich CM. Unexpectedly high incidences of chronic nonbacterial as compared to bacterial osteomyelitis in children. SO Rheumatol Int. 2016;36(12):1737–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2018.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zhao Y, Ferguson PJ. Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis and chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis in children. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2018;65(4):783–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2018.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Morbach H, Girschick HJ. Chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis in childhood - a comprehensive review. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2013;9(1):17–21. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573397111309010006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bousvaros A, Marcon M, Treem W, Waters P, Issenman R, Couper R. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis associated with chronic inflammatory bowel disease in children. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44(12):2500–7. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026695224019.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Khanna G, Sato TS, Ferguson P. Imaging of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. Radiographics. 2009;29(4):1159–77. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.294085244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Anderson SE, Heini P, Sauvain MJ, Stauffer E, Geiger L, Johnston JO, et al. Imaging of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis of childhood first presenting with isolated primary spinal involvement. Skelet Radiol. 2003;32(6):328–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-002-0602-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Iyer RS, Thapa MM, Chew FS. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(6 Suppl):S87–91. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.7212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mandell GA, Contreras SJ, Conard K, Harcke HT, Maas KW. Bone scintigraphy in the detection of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. J Nucl Med. 1998;39(10):1778–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Teixeira SR, Elias JJ, Nogueira-Barbosa MH, Guimarães MD, Marchiori E, Santos MK. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in children: state of the art. Radiol Bras. 2015;48(2):111–20. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Leclair N, Thörmer G, Sorge I, Ritter L, Schuster V, Hirsch FW. Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging in chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis in children. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0147523. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147523.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zhao Y, Sato TS, Nielsen SM, Beer M, Huang M, et al. Development of a scoring tool for chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis magnetic resonance imaging and evaluation of its interrater reliability. J Rheumatol. 2020;47(5):739–47. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Jansson AF, Müller TH, Gliera L, Ankerst DP, Wintergerst U, Belohradsky BH, et al. Clinical score for nonbacterial osteitis in children and adults. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(4):1152–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Pardeo M, Pires Marafon D, Messia V, Garganese MC, De Benedetti F, Insalaco A. Anakinra in a cohort of children with chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis. J Rheumatol. 2017;44(8):1231–8. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.160690.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Swinscow TDV. Statistics at square one, ninth edition, revised by MJ Campbell. Southampton: John Mark Ockerbloom; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zhao Y, Wu EY, Oliver MS, Cooper AM, Basiaga ML, Vora SS, et al. Consensus treatment plans for chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis refractory to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and/or with active spinal lesions. Arthritis Care Res. 2018;70(8):1228–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Fritz J. The contributions of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis and Management of Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(8):1359–60. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.150676.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Assmann G, Kueck O, Kirchhoff T, Rosenthal H, Voswinkel J, Pfreundschuh M, et al. Efficacy of antibiotic therapy for SAPHO syndrome is lost after its discontinuation: an interventional study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(5):R140. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar2812.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhao Y, Chauvin NA, Jaramillo D, Burnham JM. Aggressive therapy reduces disease activity without skeletal damage progression in chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(7):1245–51. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.141138.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jung J, Molinger M, Kohn D, Schreiber M, Pfreundschuh M, Assmann G. Intra-articular glucocorticoid injection into Sternocostoclavicular Joints in Patients with SAPHO Syndrome. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012;42(119):266–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2012.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Arnoldi AP, Schlett CL, Douis H, Geyer LL, Voit AM, Bleisteiner F, et al. Whole-body MRI in patients with nonbacterial osteitis: radiological findings and correlation with clinical data. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(6):2391–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4586-x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Fritz J, Tzaribatchev N, Claussen CD, Carrino JA, Horger MS. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: comparison of whole-body MR imaging with radiography and correlation with clinical and laboratory data. Radiology. 2009;252(3):842–51. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2523081335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Voit AM, Arnoldi AP, Douis H, Bleisteiner F, Jansson MK, Reiser MF, et al. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: clinical Longterm assessment may underestimate activity. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(8):1455–62. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.141026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hospach T, Langendoerfer M, von Kalle Y, Maier J, Dannecker GE. Spinal involvement in chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) in childhood and effect of Pamidronate. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169:1105–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-010-1188-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Gleeson H, Wiltshire E, Briody J, Hall J, Chaitow J, Sillence D, et al. Childhood chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: pamidronate therapy decreases pain and improves vertebral shape. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:707 PMID: 18381777.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ording Müller LS, Avenarius D, Olsen OE. High signal in bone marrow at diffusion weighted imaging with body background suppression (DWIBS) in healthy children. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41(2):221–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1774-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lil-Sofie MO. Establishment of normative MRI standards for the paediatric skeleton to better outline pathology. Focused on juvenile idiopathic arthritis. A dissertation for the degree of philosophiae doctor. Tromsø: University of Tromsø, Faculty of Health Sciences; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Avenarius DFM, Ording Muller LS, Rosendahl K. Joint fluid, bone marrow edemalike changes, and ganglion cysts in the pediatric wrist: features that may mimic pathologic abnormalities-follow-up of a healthy cohort. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(6):1352–7. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Shabshin N, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, Carrino JA, Keller MS, Grissom LE. High-signal T2 changes of the bone marrow of the foot and ankle in children: red marrow or traumatic changes? Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36(7):670–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0129-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    d'Angelo P, de Horatio LT, Toma P, Ording Müller LS, Avenarius D, von Brandis E, et al. Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis - clinical and magnetic resonance imaging features. Pediatr Radiol. 2021;51(2):282–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04827-6 Epub 2020 Oct 9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No specific funding was received from any bodies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors to carry out the work described in this article.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MC, DPM, FR, YZ, MP, VM, LTDH, PT, FDB, AI all contributed to the study conception and design. MC and FR were involved in the acquisition of data. MC, DPM, FR, FDB, AI analyzed and interpreted the data. MC, DPM, FR, FDB, AI participated in manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonella Insalaco.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved from the ethics committee of the “Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù” with the ethics approval number 2144/2020.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Table A1. Sequence parameters of WB-MRI protocol. Table A2. CROMRIS template. Table A3. Clinical disease features during follow up. Fig. A1. Example of whole-body MRI and of the calculation of the RAI-CROMRIS of a patient. Fig. A2. Skeletal involvement.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Capponi, M., Pires Marafon, D., Rivosecchi, F. et al. Assessment of disease activity using a whole-body MRI derived radiological activity index in chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis. Pediatr Rheumatol 19, 123 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-021-00620-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis
  • Whole body magnetic resonance imaging
  • CROMRIS
  • PGA
  • Disease activity
  • Children