Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Development and validation of the CAREGIVERS questionnaire: multi-assessing the impact of juvenile idiopathic arthritis on caregivers

Pediatric Rheumatology volume 18, Article number: 3 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The primary caregiver is an important person in the life of patients with JIA. Their reactions depend on social, emotional and economic factors that affect the therapeutic alliance. Some generic instruments have been used to evaluate burden, anxiety, or quality of life of caregivers. This study aims to develop a specific instrument to measure the psychosocial and economic impacts on primary caregivers of patients with JIA.

Methodology

This is a mixed methods research, that includes qualitative and quantitative data, and was carried out in two phases. First phase: a pragmatic qualitative study (questionnaire construction) was conducted in two parts, a non-systematic literature review followed by interviews with primary caregivers. Second phase: a cross-sectional study (questionnaire validation) to complete validation and estimate Cronbach’s alphas based on tetrachoric correlation coefficients, correlation matrix and Cohen’s kappa coefficient test.

Results

There were 38 articles found related to the experience of caregivers. 15 primary caregivers were interviewed (female 93%, median age 45 years). Thematic analysis identified 9 important topics from the perspective of participants (economic impact, coping, family roles, impact of diagnosis, mental health, couple/mate relationships, impact at work, religion, and knowledge of the disease). These topics were combined to create the interview questionnaire (56 items). Later, it was modified to 62 items that were divided into five dimensions: impact of the disease (psychosocial, economic, family, and relationships), knowledge of the disease, alternative medicine, future, and religion.

The interview questionnaire was applied to 32 primary caregivers (female 93%, median age 37 years), results identify depression on 29 (90%), 18 (56%) feel sadness at diagnosis, 20 (63%) mentioned that JIA has influenced in their financial situation, 23 (72%) feel anxiety about the future, and 11 (37%) considered that their family relationships have changed.

Statistical analysis identified inconsistencies during convergent and divergent validity of the construct. Consequently, 11 items were eliminated, 3 relocated, 6 modified, and 39 compacted obtaining the “Impact of Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases on Caregivers Multi-assessment Questionnaire” (CAREGIVERS questionnaire). This final version resulted on an eight-dimension (28 items) instrument.

Conclusions

The CAREGIVERS questionnaire captures perspectives of both the participants and clinicians. It will be helpful to measure the impact of the disease and thus, to improve the quality of care of children with JIA and their families.

Background

Pediatric rheumatic diseases (PRD) constitute a heterogeneous set of disorders linked to abnormalities in the functioning of the immune system. The main characteristic of this type of pathology is inflammation of the connective tissue, especially the joints, blood vessels, and skin [1].

The most common PRD is juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) that is a group of chronic diseases in children and adolescents characterized by joint pain and inflammation, with limited range of movement, functional disability, and structural damage over the years [2]. JIA can influence psychosocial, economic, physical and educational development, affecting the quality of the life of children and their families [3, 4].

The primary caregiver is an important person in the life of patients with JIA, since it is the main support to carry out medical instructions to control the disease [5,6,7]. The reactions of the caregiver to JIA depend on many factors such as experience in crisis situations and medical problems, socio-economic status, local culture, knowledge of the disease, quality of health services and support networks. This may affect the therapeutic alliance and adherence of the patient [4, 5, 8,9,10].

Some instruments have been created to measure burden, anxiety, depression or quality of life of caregivers, however, those have not been designed for JIA [11,12,13]. None of these instruments integrates social, emotional, economic, and physical issues in a single questionnaire, which are frequently affected areas in caregivers [6, 7, 14]. Therefore, it is necessary to increase research that contributes to the understanding of the burden of JIA on caregivers and their influence on the outcomes. We hypothesize that an instrument specifically designed for those taking care of JIA patients will be better for capture their needs and interests. In addition, it will make the evaluation more efficient by integrating several dimensions into a single questionnaire.

The aim of this study is to develop and to validate a specific instrument that measures the psychosocial and economic impact on primary caregivers of children and adolescents with JIA.

Methodology

Study design

This is a mixed methods research study, that includes qualitative and quantitative data, and was carried out in two phases [15,16,17]. First phase: a pragmatic qualitative study (questionnaire construction) was conducted in two parts, a non-systematic literature review followed by interviews with primary caregivers. Second phase: a cross-sectional study (questionnaire validation) validity were completed (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Overview of the questionnaire construction and validation process

Full size image

The literature review, designing of the items, and face validity were conducted by a multidisciplinary group of professionals. It was formed by 3 pediatric rheumatologists (certified by Mexican Rheumatology Board and with at least 3 years of clinical practice), one fellow in pediatric rheumatology, one psychologist with experience in chronic diseases, and a methodologist with expertise in the development of questionnaires.

This research received approval by local Ethics Committee (PE17–00012), and written informed consents were collected from each participant.

Participants

Between April 2017 and April 2018, we prospectively included primary caregivers, of both genders, of patients with JIA (according to International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria [18]) who attend the Pediatric Rheumatology Clinic of Hospital Universitario “Dr. José Eleuterio González” or researchers (NER-P and FG-R) private practice. All the participants had to be a close family member of the patient (parent, older sibling, grandparent/grandmother, or aunt/uncle) and did not receive any kind of payment for their care. We excluded caregivers of patients that were admitted to the hospital 4 weeks prior, caregivers who were diagnosed with a chronic disease, caregivers that care for more than one patient with a chronic disease and caregivers who refused to participate.

Sample

A convenience sampling was applied, basing sample size on the quality criteria proposed by Terwee et al. [19], who suggested that 30 patients were needed to construct validation. We also included 15 additional participants to conduct the first phase interviews and another 15 in a pilot study of the questionnaire’s first version. The semi-structured interviews provided thematic saturation [20] regarding the caregivers’ experience and their impact taking care of JIA patients.

Participants were selected to obtain a heterogeneous sample; these include different ages, patient’s JIA category, education, and social environment.

Phase 1. Construction of the questionnaire

Non-systematic literature review

Items for the questionnaire were first based on a non-systematic review of the literature using the following databases: MEDLINE, ProQuest and Scopus. We looked for terms related to caregiving and chronic childhood illnesses (not only PRD) to identify the more relevant issues associated with the burden of caregivers (Additional file 1 and Additional file 2). Then, papers were individually analyzed by the multidisciplinary group and discussed to generate a list of items that must be considered for the instrument.

Semi-structured interviews

A pragmatic qualitative study [21,22,23] with face-to-face interviews was conducted with 15 participants with the objective of identifying which areas of their life were impacted after the illness was diagnosed. The caregivers that participated in this phase were not included in the validation stage.

The interviewer asked the caregiver to participate, if agreed, they were invited to a private room for the interview to be carried out. The interview was recorded for further analysis. No incentives were offered for their participation.

The participants followed a semi-structured interview specifically designed for the purpose of this study. A guide for the interview was constructed by the multidisciplinary group based on the results of the literature review and their own experience. Topics investigated were mood, emotional problems, suffering of the disease, family issues, difficulties in obtaining medical attention, financial problems, religion, beliefs and supporting networks. During the interview, they were asked to explain their experiences and emotions as care holders, also look at each topic and consider whether those referred to relevant aspects of the caregiver’s burden. They were also asked if they considered that any items were missing that could be beneficial for the questionnaire. The participants were not manipulated in any way by the interviewer to obtain certain answers.

A thematic analysis was performed of the recorded interviews transcriptions. Important topics were identified from the perspective of the participants; then, analysis and interpretation were completed by the multidisciplinary group during several meetings [22, 24].

We integrated information that was collected from the literature review with the results of the thematic analysis to construct the first draft of the instrument. The questions and response categories were based on phrases used by the participants during the interviews to avoid technical terms.

Phase 2. Validation of the questionnaire

During face and content validity, the multidisciplinary group met to assess the relevance of the items drafted to create the first version of the questionnaire. This was tested in a pilot study with 15 participants. After the group analyzed the results, it was decided that questions should be organized by dimensions (mental health, socioeconomic impact, supporting networks, and new topics) and minor revisions were made to obtain the second version of the questionnaire. This version was reviewed by a psychometrist to obtain a third version (Fig. 1).

The third version of the questionnaire was applied to 32 participants. Quality of life (Spanish Version of EuroQol instrument: EQ-5D-3 L, 14 items), coping (Reyes-Lagunes and Góngora-Coronado, UNAM 1996, adapted dimensions “When I have problems with my children’s health” and “When I have problems in my life”, 18 items each), socioeconomic impact (“Determinación del Impacto Económico en Enfermedades Reumáticas” instrument, short version, 26 items), and depression (Spanish Version Beck’s Depression Inventory, 21 items) questionnaires were also applied to participants to demonstrate the validity of the construct.

The questionnaire was applied to 50% of the participants 7 days after the first test to evaluate the reliability of the instrument (test-retest).

After validation results were analyzed by the multidisciplinary group, modifications were made to create the final version of the questionnaire.

Qualitative and quantitative analysis

The analysis was performed according to the phase. We performed qualitative analysis using ATLAS/ti software, where relevant topics were identified by transcription of the interviews. After construction of the first version of the questionnaire, face validity was made as described above.

The quantitative analysis was carried out after data was collected and coded from the questionnaires. Central tendency and dispersion statistics were estimated for demographic characteristics of participant.

The assessment of the internal consistency was done by estimating the Cronbach’s alphas for each dimension of the questionnaire based on tetrachoric correlation coefficients of the items. Alphas equal to or greater than 0.40 (p < .05) were considered acceptable [25, 26].

A correlation matrix of variables of each dimension were carried out to look for redundancies and reduce the questionnaire. For pairs of variables with correlation coefficients higher than 0.70, we selected the one that explained the greatest variation.

External consistency or reliability was estimated with the test-retest. It was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa coefficient test, comparing the scores obtained between the first and the second evaluation in 50% of the participants to whom the same instrument was applied twice within a 7 days interval. All statistical analyses were carried out using Stata V. 11.

Results

Phase 1. Construction of the questionnaire

During the literature review, 38 articles were found related to the experience of caregivers on pediatric patients with chronic diseases (Additional file 1 and Additional file 2).

The interviews (10 performed by a medical anthropologist and 5 by a senior fellow on Pediatric Rheumatology) lasted 15 to 20 min each. Participants were mostly female (93%), median age was 45 years (ranged 28 to 60) and reporting 11.7 years of schooling (ranged 0 to 20). After the thematic analysis, we identified important topics from the perspective of participants (Table 1). We used them to create a draft of the questionnaire.

Table 1 Results from thematic analysis of interviews transcriptions
Full size table

Phase 2. Validation of the questionnaire (Fig. 1)

During face validity, the draft was modified to create Version 1 of the instrument, which included 56 items, 50 with categorical answers and 6 open-ended questions.

The pilot study performed with 15 participants (80% female, median age 39 [ranged 26 to 63] years) shown confusion in 3 items, that were restructured, and 6 were eliminated upon finding them reiterative. The need for questions that looked deeper into caregivers’ relationships (e.g. mates and patients), future expectative, alternative medicine, social networks, and religion were also identified. Consequently, items were created and added to the instrument to complete Version 2. The multidisciplinary group considered it appropriate to divide this version into five dimensions for further analysis: impact of the disease (psychosocial, economic, family, and relationships), knowledge of the disease, alternative medicine, future, and religion.

After the psychometrist reviewed Version 2, 6 items were confusing and therefore modified, 5 were eliminated for being redundant. Items were organized in the same five dimensions to obtained Version 3. Evolution of questionnaire composition are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Evolution on numbers of items and domains during questionnaire construction
Full size table

Version 3 and the other 4 tools were applied to 32 caregivers for the validity analysis. Characteristics of patients and participants are presented in Table 3. Coping strategies identified were mainly emotional-negative (31 participants, 97%).

Table 3 Characteristics of the patients and caregivers participating in the construct validation of the version 3 (n = 32)
Full size table

Data from our questionnaire revealed that 18 (56%) participants felt sadness when the diagnosis was confirmed, but in 27 (84%) of them change through time, and currently 14 (44%) feel relief. Twenty (63%) participants mentioned that JIA has influenced their financial situation, 23 (72%) felt anxiety about the future of their children, and 11 (37%) considered that their family relationships have changed since the diagnosis. Bullying was reported from 10 (31%), nine has used social networks to interact with people in the same situation, and 29 (91%) have an established religion. All the participants knew the name of the disease and treatment of their patients. The questionnaire was well tolerated by the participants, taking 18 min (IQR 16 to 21) to answer and only 0.2% of missing data.

Statistical analysis identified inconsistencies during convergent and divergent validity of the construct, carried out with correlation matrices (Additional file 3). Cronbach’s alphas derived from internal consistency assessment of the third version are shown on Table 4. The test-retest reliability evaluation found disagreements in 6 questions.

Table 4 Results from internal consistency analysis of the third version of the questionnaire
Full size table

Based on the qualitative and quantitative validation analysis, the third version of the questionnaire was adjusted: 11 items were eliminated, 3 relocated, 6 modified, and 39 compacted in 14 items; domains were also modified. With this, final version of the “Impact of Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases on Caregivers Multi-assessment Questionnaire” (CAREGIVERS questionnaire) resulted in an eight-dimension (28 items) instrument (Additional file 4).

DISCUSION

The CAREGIVERS questionnaire shown a good understanding among participants, reliability, and consistency to measure the psychosocial and economic impact on caregivers of patients with JIA. It represents the first step to establish a program of research into demands of caregivers and becomes an effort to improve their conditions. The instrument content is supported by the literature review, opinions from a multidisciplinary group of professionals and what the caregivers expressed during the interviews. Besides, qualitative and quantitative evaluation derived in critical analysis that assured the questionnaire in a comprehensive, relevant and practical way to administer.

The primary caregiver is the adult that lives with and is the most active in caring for a child [11, 27]. In children with PRD, the caregiver’s responsibility increases because of complex medical therapies and long disease activity periods, trying to combine those issues with the patient’s rise and family functioning [13, 28]. Previously, positive and negative impacts have been described on caregivers [6, 7, 13, 29,30,31], but little is known about how diseases affect individual needs, social interactions, family economy, and emotions. Therefore, it is imperative that we study the impact of illness-related to caregiving on this population.

Results show a stable instrument, even though problems in internal consistency were identified, resulting in low alpha scores in “Knowledge of the disease” and “Religion” dimensions. This situation was due to an initial excessively large construction (with many elements) in “Knowledge of the disease” dimension. We also detected high variability in answers (due to the inclusion of open-ended questions) and that the dimension had not influenced on caregivers. Even more, we considered that the goal of the instrument was to evaluate the impact of the disease and not in the knowledge, this dimension was eliminated. In the “Religion” dimension, the two original items show a narrow and opposite spectrum of responses, thus were compacted in one item and expanded the answer options.

Multiple areas have been described as affected in caregivers of patients with JIA, some of those appeared during the descriptive analysis of the population. In other studies, changes were reported in relationships and role distribution in families, emotional distress experiences, appraisal of illness uncertainty, elevated out-of-pocket costs and limited time for other activities [10, 13, 14, 28, 32,33,34]. Results also show that caregivers often avoid to reveal their emotions to other family members [13, 14, 35]. This was similar to the attitudes found in our population, specially related with the lack of supporting networks. All these topics are addressed in the proposed instrument.

Previous research has focused more on caregiver characteristics and patient’s well-being but little has been investigated about family composition, relationships, social and support networks for caregivers. Moreover, the evaluations were made with a wide variety of instruments [7, 12, 28,29,30, 33, 34, 36] or through interviews and qualitative analysis [6, 7, 12,13,14, 31, 32, 34]. Approaching those issues in a multi-assessment manner is the most relevant contribution of the CAREGIVERS questionnaire, which could help to identify patterns of caregiver response and their relationship to patients’ outcome.

There is a lack of information about programs based on emotional health of the caregiver or specific data on the relationship of caregiver problems and final outcome of JIA [35,36,37]. However, interventions and social supporting programs to patient and their caregivers results in development of positive coping mechanisms, improving stress management and decreasing anxiety and depression [1, 8, 37]. Studies on this field will be benefited with this instrument because it could provide a lot of important information with a simple evaluation.

The questionnaire is proposed to be used as a multidimension screening instrument for burden of caregivers. It allows to examine the impact of JIA on several areas of the caregiver’s life, looking for specific concerns and needs in which treatment could be required.

We found some limitations in our study, the first was the relatively small sample size. JIA is a disease with a low prevalence, therefore the sample requested by clinimetric and psychometric studies is smaller, and it is difficult to concentrate a large number of patients with this pathology. The second limitation is that the validation process was not completed since the sensitivity to change and external validity was not accomplished. This will be done in a multicentric study with a larger sample size that is currently conducted by the authors.

Designing a multidimensional questionnaire from the perspective of those who bear the burden of the disease is a complex process that requires the participation of caregivers and clinical and psychological providers. The CAREGIVERS questionnaire accomplished the balance between those aspects; it will be helpful to measure the impact of the disease and therefore, to improve the quality of care of children with JIA and their families.

Finally, the objective of this work was to focus on the caregivers for JIA patients, because it is the most frequent PRD [2] however, being so valuable, we propose to consider further studies to evaluate its application in other diseases.

Conclusion

The CAREGIVERS questionnaire shown a good understanding among participants, reliability and consistency to measure the psychosocial and economic impact on primary caregivers of patients with JIA. It is necessary to complete the external validation of the instrument in further studies.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author with a reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CAREGIVERS questionnaire:

Impact of Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases on Caregivers Multi-assessment Questionnaire

EQ-5D-3 L:

Spanish Version of EuroQol instrument

IQR:

Interquartile range

JIA:

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

PRD:

Pediatric rheumatic diseases

UNAM:

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

References

  1. Cohen EM, Morley-Fletcher A, Mehta DH, Lee YC. A systematic review of psychosocial therapies for children with rheumatic diseases. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2017;15(1):6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Prakken B, Albani S, Martini A. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Lancet. 2011;377(9783):2138–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. García-Méndez M, Rivera-Aragón S, Reyes-Lagunes I, Díaz-Loving R. El enfrentamiento y el conflicto: Factores que intervienen en la depresión. Acta Investig psicológica. 2011;1(3):13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Trujano R, Ávila D, Vega Z, Nava C. Estrés familiar y adherencia terapéutica en pacientes con enfermedades crónicas. Altern en Psicol. 2012;26:7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mould-Quevedo J, Pelaez-Ballestas I, Vazquez-Mellado J, Teran-Estrada L, Esquivel-Valerio J, Ventura-Rios L, et al. Social costs of the most common inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Mexico from the patient's perspective. Gac Med Mex. 2008;144(3):225–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gomez-Ramirez O, Gibbon M, Berard R, Jurencak R, Green J, Tucker L, et al. A recurring rollercoaster ride: a qualitative study of the emotional experiences of parents of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2016;14(1):13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mawani N, Amine B, Rostom S, El Badri D, Ezzahri M, Moussa F, et al. Moroccan parents caring for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: positive and negative aspects of their experiences. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2013;11(1):39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pelaez-Ballestas I, Boonen A, Vazquez-Mellado J, Reyes-Lagunes I, Hernandez-Garduno A, Goycochea MV, et al. Coping strategies for health and daily-life stressors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and gout: STROBE-compliant article. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(10):e600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pelaez-Ballestas I, Romero-Mendoza M, Ramos-Lira L, Caballero R, Hernandez-Garduno A, Burgos-Vargas R. Illness trajectories in Mexican children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and their parents. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006;45(11):1399–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Santer M, Ring N, Yardley L, Geraghty AW, Wyke S. Treatment non-adherence in pediatric long-term medical conditions: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies of caregivers' views. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wells DK, James K, Stewart JL, Moore IM, Kelly KP, Moore B, et al. The care of my child with cancer: a new instrument to measure caregiving demand in parents of children with cancer. J Pediatr Nurs. 2002;17(3):201–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ryan JL, Mullins LL, Ramsey RR, Bonner MS, Jarvis JN, Gillaspy SR, et al. Caregiver demand and parent distress in juvenile rheumatic disease: the mediating effect of parent attitude toward illness. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2013;20(3):351–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Knafl K, Leeman J, Havill NL, Crandell JL, Sandelowski M. The contribution of parent and family variables to the well-being of youth with arthritis. J Fam Nurs. 2015;21(4):579–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yuwen W, Lewis FM, Walker AJ, Ward TM. Struggling in the Dark to Help My Child: Parents’ Experience in Caring for a Young Child with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Pediatr Nurs. 2017;37:e23–e9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fava GA, Tomba E, Sonino N. Clinimetrics: the science of clinical measurements. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(1):11–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Prutkin JM, Feinstein AR. Quality-of-life measurements: origin and pathogenesis. Yale J Biol Med. 2002;75(2):79–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Pluye P, Hong QN. Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, Baum J, Glass DN, Goldenberg J, et al. International league of associations for rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(2):390–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pope C, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000;320(7226):50–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pelaez-Ballestas I, Burgos-Vargas R. The qualitative approach in health: an alternative to clinical research in rheumatic diseases. Reumatol Clin. 2005;1(3):166–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rice P, Ezzy D. Qualitative research methods. A health focus. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Miller W, Crabtree R. The dance of interpretation. In: Crabtree BFMW, editor. Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oak: Sage Publications Inc; 1999. p. 127–44.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Deveillis R. Guidelines in scale development. In: Deveillis R, editor. Scale development: theory and applications. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Klassen A, Klaassen RJ, Dix D, Pritchard S, Yanofsky R, Sung L. Caregiving demands in parents of children with cancer: psychometric validation of the Care of my Child with Cancer questionnaire. J Pediatr Nurs. 2010;25(4):258–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pinquart M. Parenting stress in caregivers of children with chronic physical condition-a meta-analysis. Stress Health. 2018;34(2):197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Herzer M, Godiwala N, Hommel KA, Driscoll K, Mitchell M, Crosby LE, et al. Family functioning in the context of pediatric chronic conditions. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2010;31(1):26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McClellan CB, Cohen LL. Family functioning in children with chronic illness compared with healthy controls: a critical review. J Pediatr. 2007;150(3):221–3 3 e1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Popp JM, Robinson JL, Britner PA, Blank TO. Parent adaptation and family functioning in relation to narratives of children with chronic illness. J Pediatr Nurs. 2014;29(1):58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chaney JM, Gamwell KL, Baraldi AN, Ramsey RR, Cushing CC, Mullins AJ, et al. Parent perceptions of illness uncertainty and child depressive symptoms in juvenile rheumatic diseases: examining caregiver demand and parent distress as mediators. J Pediatr Psychol. 2016;41(9):941–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kuhlmann A, Schmidt T, Treskova M, Lopez-Bastida J, Linertova R, Oliva-Moreno J, et al. Social/economic costs and health-related quality of life in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Europe. Eur J Health Econ. 2016;17(Suppl 1):79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chausset A, Gominon AL, Montmaneix N, Echaubard S, Guillaume-Czitrom S, Cambon B, et al. Why we need a process on breaking news of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a mixed methods study. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2016;14(1):31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gerhardt CA, Vannatta K, McKellop JM, Zeller M, Taylor J, Passo M, et al. Comparing parental distress, family functioning, and the role of social support for caregivers with and without a child with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2003;28(1):5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bruns A, Hilario MO, Jennings F, Silva CA, Natour J. Quality of life and impact of the disease on primary caregivers of juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients. Joint Bone Spine. 2008;75(2):149–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Toupin April K, Cavallo S, Ehrmann Feldman D, Ni A. The associations among economic hardship, caregiver psychological distress, disease activity, and health-related quality of life in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(7):1185–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funds were received to complete this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Hospital Universitario “Dr. José E. González”, Monterrey, Mexico

    Marcia Daniela Torres-Made, Fernando García-Rodríguez, Ana Victoria Villarreal-Treviño, Brenda de Jesús Fortuna-Reyna, Manuel Enrique de la O-Cavazos & Nadina Eugenia Rubio-Pérez

  2. Rheumatology Unit, Hospital General de México “Dr. Eduardo Liceaga”, Mexico City, Mexico

    Ingris Peláez-Ballestas

Authors
  1. Marcia Daniela Torres-Made
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ingris Peláez-Ballestas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fernando García-Rodríguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ana Victoria Villarreal-Treviño
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Brenda de Jesús Fortuna-Reyna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Manuel Enrique de la O-Cavazos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nadina Eugenia Rubio-Pérez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MDT-M interviewed the participants, interpreted the patient data, designed the questionnaire and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. IP-B interviewed the participants, performed statistical analysis, interpreted the patient data, designed the questionnaire and critically reviewed the manuscript. FG-R interpreted the patient data, designed the questionnaire and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. AVV-T interpreted the patient data and contribute to design the questionnaire. BJF-R interviewed the participants and collaborate in validation process. NER-P provide the main idea, interviewed the participants, interpreted the patient data, designed the questionnaire and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadina Eugenia Rubio-Pérez.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research received approval by Hospital Universitario “Dr. José E. González” local Ethics Committee (PE17–00012), and a written informed consent were collected from each participant.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Description of the non-systematical literature review.

Additional file 2.

 Supplementary figure: Overview of search results and review.

Additional file 3.

Correlation matrix resulted from construct analysis.

Additional file 4.

CAREGIVERS questionnaire: Impact of Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases on Caregivers Multi-Assessment Questionnaire.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torres-Made, M.D., Peláez-Ballestas, I., García-Rodríguez, F. et al. Development and validation of the CAREGIVERS questionnaire: multi-assessing the impact of juvenile idiopathic arthritis on caregivers. Pediatr Rheumatol 18, 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-020-0400-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-020-0400-z

Keywords

Pediatric Rheumatology

ISSN: 1546-0096