Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Long noncoding RNAs (CTC-471J1.2, NeST) as epigenetic risk factors of active juvenile lupus nephritis: a case-control study

Pediatric Rheumatology volume 22, Article number: 48 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Measurement of the circulating levels of long-non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in lupus nephritis (LN) patients could dramatically explore more insights about the disease pathogenesis. Hence, we aimed to quantify the level of expression of CTC-471J1.2 and NeST in LN patients and to correlate it with the disease activity.

Method

This case-control study was conducted on a group of children with juvenile LN attending to Mansoura University Children’s Hospital (MUCH). Demographics, clinical, and laboratory findings were collected besides the measurement of lncRNAs by quantitative real-time PCR.

Results

The expression level of lncRNAs-CTC-471J1.2 was significantly down-regulated in children with active LN versus inactive cases or controls. In contrast, the NeST was significantly up-regulated in active LN cases. A significant correlation was found between CTC-471J1.2 expression and LN activity parameters. Additionally, both lncRNAs showed a reasonable sensitivity and specificity in differentiation of active LN. A regression analysis model revealed that CTC-471J1.2 and NeST were independent predictors of active nephritis.

Conclusion

The expression level of circulatory lncRNAs-CTC-471J1.2 and NeST can be used as sensitive and specific biomarkers for active LN. Furthermore, both could serve as predictors for nephritis activity.

Introduction

Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE) is a systemic heterogeneous autoimmune disease characterized by various clinical manifestations involving different tissues [1]. Lupus nephritis (LN), which is considered one of the most severe manifestations of SLE, affects up to 70% of children with a significant impact on the disease outcome [2]. SLE complex pathogenesis has not been fully elucidated, there is a possible association of SLE with environmental factors, genetic, epigenetic expression, innate, and adaptive immunity ends with immune complexes deposition in the tissues [3, 4].

Conventional immunological serum biomarkers cannot offer specificity and/or sensitivity for full LN assessment and renal biopsy is still the gold standard to confirm the diagnosis, disease staging, and severity assessment [5].

More than 80% of the human genome is transcribed into RNA transcripts without protein-coding potential. These long-non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are long RNA segments longer than 200 nucleotides. They are located in either the nucleus or cytoplasm. They can affect gene expression by different mechanisms through interactions with transcription factors or epigenetic modifiers [6]. Measurement of plasma or serum levels of lncRNAs makes them potential and non-invasive biomarkers for the assessment of disease activity and prognosis [7].

There are different lncRNAs that can be used as a new hotspot in SLE. They are accurate biomarkers with high throughput, some of them can be beneficial in diagnosis, and others could serve as next-generation biomarkers to differentiate SLE patients with LN from those without [8].

CTC-471J1.2 is an example of lncRNAs located on chromosome 19. It has been shown to exhibit high sensitivity and specificity as a diagnostic marker for LN. Expression of CTC-471J1.2 has been shown to display a negative correlation with disease activity scores in all SLE patients and a positive correlation with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) only in LN patients [9].

The lncRNA Nettoie Salmonella pas Theiler’s (NeST) formally known as Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus persistence candidate gene 1 (Tmevpg1) is an enhancer-like lncRNA. It is expressed in T helper 1 cells, CD8+ T cells, and natural killer cells. It is located adjacent to the interferon gamma (IFN-γ) encoding gene so, its expression leads to the enhancement of IFN-γ production and that could participate in the pathogenesis of SLE [10].

The assessment of the circulating levels of lncRNAs in juvenile LN patients could dramatically explore more insights into the disease pathogenesis. Hence, we aimed with this study to evaluate the expression of CTC-471J1.2 and NeST in LN patients and to evaluate whether their expression may play a role in the pathogenesis of the disease.

Methods

Subjects

This case-control study was conducted on 61 patients who attended to Mansoura University Children’s Hospital (MUCH), Mansoura, Egypt diagnosed with JSLE and forty age and sex-matched healthy children as controls. It was done in the period from August 2021 to October 2022. Cases were classified according to the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification criteria for SLE [11].

Inclusion criteria:

  1. 1.

    JSLE patients with lupus nephritis. Diagnosis of LN was defined as children with proteinuria > 0.5 g /24 h and/or proteinuria > 3+ and/or cellular casts (erythrocyte, granular, tubular, or mixed) and confirmed by renal biopsy [12].

  2. 2.

    Patient whose parents gave informed consent to be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria:

Cases with SLE without lupus nephritis, patients who had other conditions can affect the expression of these epigenetic factors as diabetes mellitus, malignancies, or those with a diagnosis of other connective tissue diseases.

Data collection

Data were collected from our medical files and interpreted with respect to the demographic, clinical, disease assessment parameters, and laboratory features of the disease as follow:

  1. 1.

    Disease assessment including, JSLE disease activity and cumulative damage was measured using the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2 K) [13] and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/ACR (SLICC/ACR) Damage Index [14]. No activity (SLEDAI = 0), mild activity (SLEDAI = 1–5), moderate activity (SLEDAI = 6–10), high activity (SLEDAI > 10) [15].

  2. 2.

    Renal SLEDAI, which consists of the four kidney related parameters of the SLEDAI-2 K: haematuria, pyuria, proteinuria, and urinary casts, each item in the renal SLEDAI is assigned four points. Thus, scores for the renal SLEDAI can range from 0 to a maximum of 16 [13].

  3. 3.

    Pathological grading of LN is categorized according to the International Society of Nephrology (ISN) and Renal Pathology Society (RPS) 2003 criteria [16]. Active LN defined as LN class III/IV with National Institutes of Health (NIH) activity index ≥ 10. NIH activity index score ranges 0 – 24. This activity score is based on the histological characteristics of active inflammation: endocapillary hypercellularity with/without leukocyte infiltration, karyorrhexis (fibrinoid necrosis), rupture of the basement membrane, fibrocellular crescents, subendothelial deposits (wire loops), and intraluminal immune aggregates (hyaline thrombi). NIH chronicity index score ranges 0 –12. The chronicity index reflects the damage features: glomerular sclerosis (segmental or global), fibrous adhesions or fibrous crescents, interstitial fibrosis, and tubular atrophy [17].

  4. 4.

    Laboratory investigations:

    1. a)

      Complete blood count (CBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), liver function tests, serum creatinine, complement (low C3 < 90 mg/dl, low C4 < 8 mg/dl), urine analysis, antinuclear antibodies (ANAs), anti-dsDNA, 24-h urine analysis for proteinuria, as classical diagnostic biomarkers for Lupus and LN.

Sample size calculation

All eligible cases were collected along the study duration according to the inclusion criteria (convenient samples).

Sample collection for analysis of lncRNAs expression

Two millilitres of blood were collected in EDTA-containing blood collection tubes from all subjects participating in this study and transferred immediately to the Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from blood samples using Ficoll-Hypaque density-gradient centrifugation and used for the separation of lncRNAs. Total RNA extraction was done using QIAzol Lysis Reagent in accordance with the manufacturer′s specifications (QIAGEN, Germany). The RNA concentration and purity were checked by Thermo Scientific NanoDrop One. Reverse transcription of 1ug of RNA was done using SensiFAST™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bioline, UK) on Applied Biosystems Proflex Thermal Cycler. cDNA templates were amplified using a real-time PCR instrument (Azure Cielo 6, Azure, USA) and primers specific for CTC-471J1.2 and NeST amplifications.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was done in 20 μl total reaction volume [10 μl of Bioline SYBR green PCR Master Mix (Bioline, UK), 1 μl of cDNA template, 1 μl (10 pmol/μl) for each forward and reverse gene primers, and 7 μl of nuclease-free water] using the following program: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s. β-actin was used as an endogenous reference gene to normalize the lncRNA expression levels.

The primer sets were designated using Primer3Plus software (http://www.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/primer3plus/primer3plus.cgi), and primer specificity was checked using Primer-BLAST program (NCBI/ primer-BLAST (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/). Primers were purchased from Vivantis (Vivantis Technologies, Malaysia).

The sequences of the used primer pairs are supplied on Table 1. The specificity of each primer was confirmed by the presence of a single sharp peak by melting curve.

Table 1 The sequence of human primers used in qRT-PCR analysis
Full size table

The relative expression levels of CTC-471J1.2 and NeST genes were calculated by ΔΔCt method, and the fold change of gene expression was expressed as 2−ΔΔCT [18].

Statistical analysis

Using IBM SPSS (Statistical package for social science) version 24 for Windows, data were coded, computed, and analyzed:

Several variables were recoded to improve the analysis’s strength:

  • ❖ Descriptive statistics: were used to describe the demographic data, clinical and laboratory presentations of the cases

  • ❖ Qualitative data were displayed using frequency tables (Number and percentages).

  • ❖ For quantitative variables, the one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine the data’s normality before the data were displayed by central indices and dispersion:

Standard deviation (SD) and mean for variables with normally distributed data. Median and range (Minimum-Maximum) for variables with non-normal distribution.

  • ➢ Analytical statistics:

    • ❖ Chi-square test and Fischer exact test were used for categorical variables, to compare between different groups as appropriate. To compare two groups under study, the student t test was applied to parametric quantitative variables while the Mann Whitney test was applied to non-parametric quantitative data.

    • ❖ Kruskal Wallis test; to compare between more than two studied groups when comparing non-parametric quantitative variables.

    • ❖ Sensitivity and specificity analysis were performed and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to assess the impact of LncRNAs (CTC-471J1.2, NeST) levels on disease activity

    • ❖ The analysis of binary logistic regression was performed to predict the independent factors of disease activity. Calculated odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval were adjusted odds ratios.

  • ➢ Level of significance: For each statistical test, a result was deemed significant when the chance of error was 5% or less (p ≤ 0.05).

Results

The demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of JSLE participants

Sixty-one JSLE patients enrolled in the study. Demographic, and clinical characteristics for patients are shown in Fig. 1 and Table 2. The majority of cases were males (75.4%). It is known males carry poor prognosis for kidney involvement as we strictly include SLE cases with LN. The mean age of cases was 13.8 years ± 2.56 SD, whereas the mean age of the disease onset was 11.3 ± 2.29 years, and the disease duration was between 0.1–7 years with a median of 2 years. The median SLEDAI was 0- 21 with a median of 4, while renal SLEDAI was 0–16 with a median of 2. The laboratory findings and medical therapy of the studied cases are summarized in Table 3. The mean of serum creatinine was 0.64 ± 0.21 SD, and that of complement was 98.4 ± 25.8 SD. Leucopenia was detected in 3 cases and thrombocytopenia in 2 cases. Patients were subdivided into two subgroups: 45 SLE patients with inactive nephritis and 16 SLE patients with active nephritis. Subsequently, we compared the patients’ subgroups in (Table 4), and our results revealed no statistically significant difference was found among the patients’ subgroups regarding the demographic, clinical, laboratory characteristics or the medical therapy (P > 0.05).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Clinical presentations of JSLE patients

Full size image
Table 2 Demographic, characteristic, damage index, and nephritis histopathology of juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE) patients
Full size table
Table 3 The laboratory findings and medical therapy in JSLE patients
Full size table
Table 4 Comparison between active and inactive lupus nephritis (LN) regarding clinical presentations and laboratory findings
Full size table

Expression levels of LncRNAs (CTC-471J1.2, NeST) in the studied subjects

Expression profiling of lncRNAs-CTC-471J1.2 in PBMCs from inactive and active lupus nephritis patients showed a significant decrease as compared to controls (P1 = 0.02, P2 < 0.001, respectively). In contrast, the expression pattern of NeST was significantly increased in patients with inactive or active lupus nephritis (P1, P2 < 0.001) as compared to controls. Furthermore, the expression level of CTC-471J1.2 was significantly increased (P < 0.001) in patients with inactive lupus nephritis than in those with active lupus nephritis. The patients with inactive LN also displayed a significantly lower (P < 0.001) level of NeST expression than the active LN group (Table 5, Fig. 2).

Table 5 Comparison of the expression level of CTC-471J1.2 and NeST among inactive, active lupus nephritis patients, and controls
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Box plots showing the summaries of CTC-471J1.2 and NeST findings among inactive and active lupus nephritis

Full size image

Correlation between LncRNAs (CTC-471J1.2, NeST) expression levels and characteristics of lupus disease activity parameters

Detailed correlation analysis of CTC-471J1.2 and NeST levels with various clinical and laboratory parameters of the studied subjects are listed in Table 6. LncRNA-CTC-471J1.2 were negatively correlated with renal SLEDAI (r = -0.3, P = 0.04), 24-h urine protein (r = -0.3, P = 0.013), Anti-dsDNA titer (r = -0.27, P = 0.048) and NeST expression level (r = -0.46, P < 0.001). In contrast, the expression level of CTC-471J1.2 had a significantly positive correlation with complement (r = 0.28, P = 0.007). Regarding the expression level of NeST, there was no significant correlation with the SLE clinical or laboratory features (P > 0.05).

Table 6 Correlation between the expression level of CTC-471J1.2 and NeST and characteristics of SLE disease activity
Full size table

ROC curve analysis

To investigate the diagnostic utility of lncRNAs-CTC-471J1.2 and NeST in differentiation of active LN cases, we found the following: CTC-471J1.2 at a cut-off value of 0.25 provided a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 83% with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.84. NeST sensitivity was 80% and specificity of 71% at the cut-off point of 2.75 with AUC of 0.83. It was found that the combined utilization of lncRNAs-CTC-471J1.2 and NeST had sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 77% with AUC of 0.92 (Table 7, Fig. 3).

Table 7 Sensitivity analysis/ROC curve of CTC-471J1.2, NeST expression levels to discriminate disease activity
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

ROC curve of use of combined CTC-471J1.2 and NeST levels to discriminate disease activity

Full size image

Logistic regression analysis of lncRNAs (CTC-471J1.2, NeST) levels for prediction of active lupus nephritis

This analysis revealed that CTC-471J1.2 and NeST were found as independent predictors of disease activity (Table 8).

Table 8 Logistic regression analysis of CTC-471J1.2, NeST expression levels with the presence of active lupus nephritis
Full size table

Discussion

JSLE is a multisystem autoimmune disease with inflammatory consequences. It shows marked heterogeneity between patients, causing manifestations ranging from mild to severe [19]. LN is one of the most severe manifestations of SLE associated with considerable morbidity and mortality [2]. Dysregulation of lncRNAs function has been identified in cancer as well as autoimmune diseases via different mechanisms to alter encoding gene expression [20, 21]. There is mounting evidence that the lncRNAs’ expression plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of SLE and lupus nephritis by acting as a regulator of immune and inflammatory response [22]. It can also be used as a tool for evaluating renal outcome of LN patients [23].

In the current study, we aimed to investigate the expression of lncRNA-CTC-471J1.2 and NeST in pediatric lupus nephritis patients. Regarding CTC-471J1.2 expression, it was significantly downregulated in LN cases compared to controls, with higher level of expression among inactive LN patients than active LN group. Likewise, findings of Luo et al., 2018 who proposed that the downregulation in the expression level of lncRNAs including CTC-471J1.2 was associated with biological processes, cellular components, and molecular function, which affects several gene pathways, such as cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, TNF signalling pathway, MAPK signalling pathway, and NF-κB signalling pathways [24].

Saleh et al., 2019 reported in agreement with our results that the cell-free lncRNA-CTC-471J1.2 was considered a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of SLE. It was revealed to be the most specific and sensitive diagnostic biomarker among the studied markers for lupus nephritis [9, 24]. By utilizing the ROC curve, CTC-471J1.2 appears to be a potential diagnostic biomarker for lupus nephritis activity, with high sensitivity (85%) and specificity (83%).

Moreover, there was a significant negative correlation between CTC-471J1.2 and SLE activity parameters, specifically renal SLEDAI, 24 h urine protein, and anti-dsDNA titres. This is in accordance to the results of Mihaylova et al., 2020 who found that CTC-471J1.2 expression levels has a negative correlation with SLEDAI scores in all SLE patients and a positive correlation with eGFR in only LN patients [25]. As the decrement of complement is a sign of disease activity [24], CTC-471J1.2 profile was positively correlated with its level. Our study reported a significant relationship between CTC-471J1.2 and NeST lncRNAs.

NeST is a long intergenic non-coding RNAs (lincRNAs) that function through transcriptional regulation. It is located near the IFN-γ-encoding gene in both mouse and human, and it can upregulate the expression of the IFN‑γ gene pathway [10]. It is known that IFN-γ plays a principal role in the development of proliferative LN [26] and it was significantly elevated in cases with active LN [27]. Hence, NeST was hypothesized to be involved in the pathogenesis of proliferative LN by regulating inflammatory chemokines and T-helper cells.

Compared with matched controls, NeST expression was upregulated among JSLE cases, with higher levels among our active LN cohort. This finding is running with the preceding report from Li et al. [28] and Xiao et al. [29]. Its level of expression was found to be upregulated in several immune diseases such as Sjögren syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis [30] as well.

However, NeST did not show any correlation with the various nephritis activity parameters. Nevertheless, the results of correlation should be considered with caution owing to the limited sample size. Further, on applying ROC curve for NeST, it displayed a lower sensitivity (80%) and specificity (71%) than CTC-471J1.2. Thus, concluding that lncRNA-CTC-471J1.2 seems to be a better epigenetic biomarker for LN activity as asserted by previous studies [9, 25].

On applying ROC curve for CTC-471J1.2 and NeST expression levels as biomarkers for disease activity, the sensitivity raised to 93% and we found that the panel of both significantly increased the AUC value to 0.92 compared with when they were utilized individually.

Regarding the potential for the development of active lupus nephritis, our study for the first time reported that CTC-471J1.2 and NeST work as significant predictors of active LN. Additionally, CTC-471J1.2 was shown to be a better predictor of disease activity than NeST as inferred from this prediction model.

There are some limitations of our study, the sample size was relatively small, we did not correlate between lncRNAs and the histological findings of LN nor did correlate them with other conditions with renal involvement, as post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis. Therefore, large-scale studies in different populations are pivotal to confirm our findings.

Conclusion

We found that the lncRNAs (CTC-471J1.2 and NeST) were preferentially expressed in LN. CTC-471J1.2 was significantly correlated with disease activity parameters, and it appears the most specific and sensitive diagnostic biomarker for nephritis. Furthermore, both CTC-471J1.2 and NeST could serve as predictors for lupus nephritis activity.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated during this study are in this published article.

Abbreviations

ANAs:

Antinuclear antibodies

AUC:

Area under curve

CBC:

Complete blood count

CRP:

C-reactive protein

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

ESR:

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate,

EULAR/ACR:

European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology

ISN:

International Society of Nephrology

JSLE:

Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus

LincRNAs:

Long intergenic non-coding RNAs

LN:

Lupus nephritis

lncRNAs:

Long-non-coding RNAs

MUCH:

Mansoura University Children’s Hospital

NeST :

Nettoie Salmonella pas Theiler’s

NIH:

National Institutes of Health

PBMCs:

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

qRT-PCR:

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

RPS:

Renal Pathology Society

SD:

Standard deviation

SLEDAI-2K:

SLE Disease Activity Index 2000

SLICC/ACR:

Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/ACR

SPSS:

Statistical package for social science

Tmevpg1:

Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus persistence candidate gene 1

References

  1. Rahman A, Isenberg DA. Systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:929–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Borchers AT, Leibushor N, Naguwa SM, Cheema GS, Shoenfeld Y, Gershwin ME. Lupus nephritis: a critical review. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;12(2):174–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. La Paglia GMC, Leone MC, Lepri G, Vagelli R, Valentini E, Alunno A, et al. One year in review 2017: systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35(4):551–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Novick D, Elbirt D, Miller G, Dinarello CA, Rubinstein M, Sthoeger ZM. High circulating levels of free interleukin-18 in patients with active SLE in the presence of elevated levels of interleukin-18 binding protein. J Autoimmun. 2010;34(2):121–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwartz N, Goilav B, Putterman C. The pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2014;26(5):502–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Zuo Y, Xu H. Involvement of long noncoding RNAs in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. J Transl Autoimmun. 2020;3:100044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou Z, Sun B, Huang S, Zhao L. Roles of circular RNAs in immune regulation and autoimmune diseases. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(7):503.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao HY, Li D, Wang YP, Lu HX, Sun J, Li HB. Clinical significance of reduced expression of lncRNA TUG1 in the peripheral blood of systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Int J Rheum Dis. 2020;23(3):428–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Saleh A, Kasem HE, Zahran E, El-Hefnawy SM. Dysregulation of cell-free long non-coding RNAs (NEAT2, CTC-471J1.2 and lnc-DC) in Egyptian systemic lupus and lupus nephritis patients. Meta Gene. 2020;24:100665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gomez JA, Wapinski OL, Yang YW, Bureau JF, Gopinath S, Monack DM, et al. The NeST long ncRNA controls microbial susceptibility and epigenetic activation of the interferon-γ locus. Cell. 2013;152(4):743–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Aringer M, Costenbader K, Daikh D, Brinks R, Mosca M, Ramsey-Goldman R, et al. European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(9):1151–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40:1725.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gladman DD, Ibanez D, Urowitz MB. Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:288–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brunner HI, Silverman ED, To T, Bombardier C, Feldman BM. Risk factors for damage in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: cumulative disease activity and medication use predict disease damage. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(2):436–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mosca M, Merrill JT, Bombardieri S. Chapter 2 - assessment of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. In: Tsokos GC, Gordon C, Smolen JS, editors. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2007. p. 19–23.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM, Seshan SV, Alpers CE, Appel GB, et al. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. Kidney Int. 2004;65(2):521–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Austin HA 3rd, Muenz LR, Joyce KM, Antonovych TA, Kullick ME, Klippel JH, et al. Prognostic factors in lupus nephritis. Contribution of renal histologic data. Am J Med. 1983;75(3):382–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu GC, Li J, Leng RX, Li XP, Li XM, Wang DG, et al. Identification of long non-coding RNAs GAS5, linc0597 and lnc-DC in plasma as novel biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus. Oncotarget. 2017;8(14):23650–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith EMD, Lythgoe H, Midgley A, Beresford MW, Hedrich CM. Juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: update on clinical presentation, pathophysiology and treatment options. Clin Immunol. 2019;209:108274.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yougbaré I, Boire G, Roy M, Lugnier C, Rouseau E. NCS 613 exhibits anti-inflammatory effects on PBMCs from lupus patients by inhibiting p38 MAPK and NF-κB signalling pathways while reducing proinflammatory cytokine production. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2013;91(5):353–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu Q, Zhang X, Dai L, Hu X, Zhu J, Li L, et al. Long noncoding RNA related to cartilage injury promotes chondrocyte extracellular matrix degradation in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(4):969–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu Y, Zhang F, Ma J, Zhang X, Wu L, Qu B, et al. Association of large intergenic noncoding RNA expression with disease activity and organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17(1):131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang F, Wu L, Qian J, Qu B, Xia S, La T, et al. Identification of the long noncoding RNA NEAT1 as a novel inflammatory regulator acting through MAPK pathway in human lupus. J Autoimmun. 2016;75:96–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Luo Q, Li X, Xu C, Zeng L, Ye J, Guo Y, et al. Integrative analysis of long non-coding RNAs and messenger RNA expression profiles in systemic lupus erythematosus. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17(3):3489–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mihaylova G, Vasilev V, Kosturkova MB, Stoyanov GS, Radanova M. Long non-coding RNAs as new biomarkers in lupus nephritis: a connection between present and future. Cureus. 2020;12(7):e9003.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Masutani K, Taniguchi M, Nakashima H, Yotsueda H, Kudoh Y, Tsuruya K, et al. Upregulated interleukin-4 production by peripheral T-helper cells in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19(3):580–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chan RW, Lai FM, Li EK, Tam LS, Chow KM, Lai KB, et al. Intrarenal cytokine gene expression in lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(7):886–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Li Z, Chao TC, Chang KY, Lin N, Patil VS, Shimizu C, et al. The long noncoding RNA THRIL regulates TNF alpha expression through its interaction with hnRNPL. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(3):1002–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Xiao G, Zuo X. Epigenetics in systemic lupus erythematosus. Biomed Rep. 2016;4(2):135–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gao Y, Li S, Zhang Z, Yu X, Zheng J. The role of long non-coding RNAs in the pathogenesis of RA, SLE, and SS. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018;5:193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the participants and their parents for their cooperation.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Mohamed M. Zedan and Ali Sobh are equal first authors.

  2. Doaa Mosad Mosa and Marwa H. Elnagdy are equal last authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Mansoura University Children’s Hospital, Mansoura University Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt

    Mohamed M. Zedan, Ali Sobh & Mai S. Korkor

  2. Department of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mansoura University Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt

    Alshimaa Magdy & Marwa H. Elnagdy

  3. Mansoura University Children’s Hospital, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

    Zeinab R. Attia

  4. Department of Clinical Pathology, Mansoura University Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt

    Nada Khaled & Yousra Sadeq

  5. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Horus University, Damietta El Gadeeda, Egypt

    Ahmed Hazem El-Nagdy

  6. Medical Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

    Ahmed E. Taha

  7. Microbiology and Immunology Unit, Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka, 72388, Saudi Arabia

    Ahmed E. Taha

  8. Department of Pediatrics, Horus University Faculty of Medicine, Damietta, Egypt

    Mohamed Ahmed Noureldin

  9. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt

    Mohamed Taman

  10. Department of Rheumatology& Rehabilitation, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura University Faculty of Medicine, 60 Elgomhoria St, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt

    Doaa Mosad Mosa

  11. Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, New Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

    Marwa H. Elnagdy

Authors
  1. Mohamed M. Zedan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Sobh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alshimaa Magdy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mai S. Korkor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zeinab R. Attia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nada Khaled
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yousra Sadeq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ahmed Hazem El-Nagdy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ahmed E. Taha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mohamed Ahmed Noureldin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Mohamed Taman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Doaa Mosad Mosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Marwa H. Elnagdy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.M, A.S, A.M, M.S, Z.R, D.M, M.H: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software. M.M, A.S, A.M, M.S, Z.R, N.K, Y.S, A.H, A.E, MA, M.T, D.M, M.H: Data curation, Writing-Original draft preparation. M.M, A.S, A.M, M.S, Z.R, N.K, Y.S, A.H, A.E, MA, M.T, D.M, M.H: Visualization, Investigation. N.K, Y.S, A.H, A.E, MA, M.T: Supervision. M.M, A.S, A.M, M.S, Z.R, N.K, Y.S, A.H, A.E, MA, M.T, D.M, M.H: Validation. M.M, A.S, A.M, M.S, Z.R, N.K, Y.S, A.H, A.E, MA, M.T, D.M, M.H: Writing- Reviewing and Editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doaa Mosad Mosa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Institutional Research Board (IRB), Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt (R.20.08.982) approved this study.

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Patients gave informed consent regarding publishing the research results with data anonymization.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zedan, M.M., Sobh, A., Magdy, A. et al. Long noncoding RNAs (CTC-471J1.2, NeST) as epigenetic risk factors of active juvenile lupus nephritis: a case-control study. Pediatr Rheumatol 22, 48 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-023-00945-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-023-00945-1

Keywords

Pediatric Rheumatology

ISSN: 1546-0096