Open Access

Mutations in the MTHFR gene are not associated with Methotrexate intolerance in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

  • Andrea Scheuern1,
  • Nadine Fischer1,
  • Joseph McDonald2,
  • Hermine I. Brunner2,
  • Johannes-Peter Haas1 and
  • Boris Hügle1Email author
Pediatric Rheumatology201614:11

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-016-0071-y

Received: 26 January 2016

Accepted: 23 February 2016

Published: 29 February 2016

Abstract

Background

Methotrexate (MTX) intolerance is a frequent problem of long-term treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Mutations in the methylentetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene may increase toxicity of MTX, potentially constituting an initial stimulus for this conditioned response. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship of common MTHFR gene mutations and occurrence of MTX intolerance in pediatric patients with JIA treated with MTX.

Methods

Consecutive JIA patients on at least 3 months of MTX treatment were included in this study. Intolerance to MTX was determined using the Methotrexate Intolerance Severity Score (MISS) questionnaire, and MTX intolerance was defined as MISS values of ≥ 6. Presence of the two most common mutations in the MTHFR gene (C677T and A1298C) was tested using a PCR assay. Results were analyzed using descriptive and non-parametric statistics.

Results

196 patients were included (73 % female). Of those, 93 (46 %) showed MTX intolerance. 168 patients were genotyped for C677T and A1298C. MTX intolerance was not found to be significantly more frequent among patients with hetero- and homozygous or homozygous mutations C677T or A1298C compared to wild type or heterozygous mutations. Analysis of the correlation between numbers of mutations in these two loci to the MISS score did not yield a statistically significant correlation.

Conclusion

Mutations in the MTHFR gene were not found to be significantly more frequent in JIA patients intolerant to MTX. Toxicity associated with the MTHFR gene seems to result from mechanisms different to those involved in clinical MTX intolerance.

Keywords

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis Methotrexate Intolerance MTHFR Classical Conditioning Methotrexate Toxicity

Introduction

Methotrexate (MTX) has become the mainstay of treatment of polyarticular JIA in the course of the last 25 years [1]. Low-dose treatment with MTX shows few serious side effects, limited mostly to transient hepatotoxicity and bone marrow suppression in JIA [2, 3]. The most common side effects leading to MTX discontinuation in clinical practice are gastrointestinal symptoms including intolerance in the form of aversion, nausea and vomiting [4]. Clinical MTX intolerance often takes the form of anticipatory and associative nausea, a common side effect also observed among cancer patients [5]. A recent survey demonstrated that up to one half of pediatric JIA patients are affected by these symptoms, leading to refusal and premature discontinuation [6].

Hence, the majority of cases of MTX intolerance appear to constitute a conditioned response. However, it is possible that a subclinical toxicological effect might be the root cause of the symptom complex. Two mutations in the gene for methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), C667T and A1298C, are the most common cause of toxicity in high-dose MTX therapy, as these mutations lead to delayed drug clearance [7].

The objective of this study was to investigate associations between MTHFR gene mutations and MTX intolerance in patients with JIA.

Methods

Consecutive patients seen at the German Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology from October 2012 until December 2014 were included in this study after written confirmation of informed consent. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Bayerische Landesärztekammer, Munich, Germany. Inclusion criteria were 1) diagnosis of JIA [8] and 2) treatment with MTX for at least 3 months prior to inclusion. Exclusion criteria were other conditions associated with nausea and/or abdominal complaints, and concomitant medications possibly inducing nausea (excluding biologics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). The following data were extracted from patient medical records: age, gender, body weight and height, age at diagnosis, duration of disease, methotrexate dose, route of administration, folic acid supplementation (yes/no). In addition, liver function tests (GOT/GPT) were documented (elevated/within normal range) as well as treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and TNFα-antagonists (TNFA).

Intolerance to MTX was measured using the Methotrexate Intolerance Severity Score (MISS) questionnaire, which has previously been validated for use in JIA [6]. This questionnaire consists of four domains: abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and behavioral symptoms, and records symptoms before (anticipatory) and after MTX administration, as well as associative symptoms (i.e., symptoms occurring when thinking about MTX). Symptoms are assessed at the time of answering the questionnaire, with no specific time frame given. Behavioral symptoms include restlessness, irritability and refusal of MTX in response to gastrointestinal symptoms. Each of the 12 items of the MISS scale is scored on a Likert scale (0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms) for a maximum score of 36. As previously suggested, MTX intolerance was defined as ≥ 6 points on the MISS questionnaire, including at least one anticipatory, associative or behavioral symptom [9]. DNA was prepared from peripheral mononuclear cells using standardized protocols. Presence of the two most common mutations in the MTHFR gene (C677T and A1298C) was assayed using polymerase chain reaction, as described previously [7, 10].

Demographic and clinical data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Associations of demographic or treatment factors with MTHFR genotypes were analyzed using univariate statistics (chi-squared test, Student’s t-test), where appropriate. Correlation between age and MTX dose per square meter body surface area (MTX dose/m2 BSA) was calculated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. MTHFR mutations were analyzed directly and also grouped in categories by the amount of mutations in the two loci, using univariate non-parametric statistics (chi-squared test and Kruskal-Wallis test). For the latter, we assumed that 0, 1 and 2 mutations correspond to a locus with two alleles in which 0 and 2 are homozygous and 1 is heterozygous. Number of mutations in these two gene loci has previously been associated with MTX toxicity before [11].

Results

Demographic data of the 196 patients included in the study as shown in Table 1. There were 90 (90/196 = 46 %) patients who were considered MTX intolerant (MISS: median 11, range 6–32). Table 2 shows univariate analysis of demographic and clinical factors on presence of MTX intolerance. Disease duration was significantly associated with occurrence of MTX intolerance. No other factors showed any significant correlation, although there were non-significant correlations with age, duration of MTX treatment and folic acid supplementation. Higher doses of MTX were non-significantly correlated with a lower frequency of MTX intolerance (p = 0.026); there was an inverse correlation between age and MTX dose/m2 BSA (r 2 = 0.788, p < 0.001)
Table 1

Demographic and clinical data of study participants

Patients

(n = 196)

Age (median, range)

10,7 years (3,1–17,9 years)

Female gender (%)

141 (72 %)

Disease duration (median, range)

3,8 years (15,9-0,5 years)

Duration of MTX treatment (median, range)

1,2 years (13,2- 0,3 years)

Patients with MTX intolerance (%)

90 (45,9 %)

Patients on folic acid

184 (94 %)

Patients on folic acid with MTX intolerance

84 (93 %)

Table 2

Influence of demographic and clinical data on MTX intolerance

 

MTX tolerant

MTX intolerant

p

Female Gender

74/106

67/90

0. 525

Age

9,67 ± 4,42

10,83 ± 3,89

0. 055

Age at diagnosis

5,53 ± 4,09

5,13 ± 4,04

0. 495

Disease duration

4,14 ± 3,54

5,70 ± 3,78

0. 003*

Duration of MTX treatment

1,83 ± 2,33

2,45 ± 2,32

0. 064

MTX dose/m2 BSA

12,29 ± 2,08

11,63 ± 2,00

0. 026

s.c. dosing

47/106

40/90

1. 000

Folic acid supplementation

103/106

81/90

0. 069

Elevated LFT

18/106

22/90

0. 217

Treatment with TNFA

47/106

33/90

0. 309

Treatment with NSAID

37/106

31/90

1. 000

BSA body surface area, LFT liver function tests, TNFA TNFα antagonist, NSAID non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug

* significant after Bonferroni correction

DNA analyses were done in 168 patients to determine C677T and A1298C genotypes. Demographic and clinical factors were also analyzed on these patients alone, with similar results (Additional file 1: Tables S3 and S4). Among these, 40 % of patients were heterozygous, and 8 % homozygous for the C677T mutation of the MTHFR gene, 48 % of patients were heterozygous, and 14 % homozygous for the A1298C mutation; these allele frequencies are comparable to published data [12, 13].

Compared to the homozygous wild type, MTX intolerance was not found significantly more frequently in patients with hetero- and homozygous (46 % vs. 54 %, p = 0.285) or homozygous (9 % vs. 8 %, p = 1.000) C677T mutations, nor in patients with hetero- and homozygous (64 % vs.58 %, p = 0.436) or homozygous (16 % vs. 11 %, p = 0.386) A1298C mutations. Compound heterozygous mutations for C677T and A1298C were also not significantly more frequent in patients with MTX intolerance (15 % vs. 17 %, p = 0.845) (Fig. 1). Analysis of the correlation between number of mutations to the MISS score did not yield a statistically significant correlation (p = 0.441) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1

MISS scores and mutations in the C677T and A1298C loci in JIA patients on MTX. Compound and non-compound heterozygous patients are shown in the right. The numbers shown indicate p-values of the corresponding univariate analysis

Fig. 2

MISS scores and number of mutations in the C677T and A1298C loci in JIA patients on MTX. Note that there were no patients with mutations in all four possible loci

Discussion

This study demonstrates no correlation between two common mutations in the MTHFR gene and MTX intolerance in a large cohort of JIA patients. Mutations were not found more frequently in patients with MTX intolerance, nor was there any correlation between MISS score and number of mutations in the MTHFR gene. Disease duration was significantly longer in patients with MTX intolerance, and non-significant trends also showed correlation to age and duration of MTX treatment, which is not surprising. A non-significant trend toward less MTX intolerance with higher MTX doses can be explained by a clear inverse correlation between dose and age, where children at younger ages are dosed more aggressively. The observation that older age at diagnosis alone is not correlated with MTX intolerance is interesting in itself: one might expect that older children are more readily affected by a purely psychological effect.

MTX intolerance is much more frequent in younger patients than in adults [14]. It mostly occurs within the first year of treatment and worsens over time [15]. MTX intolerance in the form of anticipatory or associated nausea and vomiting has all the hallmarks of a conditioned response, where an originally neutral stimulus presented in conjunction with an unconditioned stimulus leads to a conditioned response even in the absence of the unconditioned stimulus [16]. In chemotherapy, the unconditioned stimulus clearly is drug-induced nausea; however, in low-dose MTX therapy nausea is infrequent, and cases of anticipatory nausea are possible despite lack of post-MTX nausea [6, 17]. Anticipatory nausea in other antirheumatic drugs is uncommon, despite similar rates of post-treatment nausea [18]. It is therefore reasonable to assume another, covert unconditioned stimulus as the cause of MTX intolerance.

MTX is rapidly metabolized and in low-dose therapy reaches levels of less than 5 μmol/l within 24 h [19]. Mutations in the MTHFR gene cause elevated levels of MTX in children with high-dose therapy, and in consequence, a higher and more prolonged exposure to MTX [20]. The most frequent mutations in the MTHFR gene, C677T and especially A1298 C, are associated with a higher toxicity in children and adults treated with high-dose MTX therapy [20, 21]. Influence of MTHFR on toxicity in patients treated with low-dose MTX treatment (10–15 mg/m2/week) is reported in some populations, but a recent meta-analysis found no clear correlation [2224]. The C677T and A1298C mutations in the MTHFR gene also lead to higher plasma homocysteine levels, and homocysteine plasma levels have been shown to increase according to the number of mutations in an individual [11]. However, the lack of association between mutations in the MTHFR gene and MTX intolerance in this study render elevated levels of MTX and homocysteine unlikely candidates as an unconditioned stimulus in MTX intolerance.

Patients frequently receive antiemetics and a variety of home remedies in conjunction with MTX intake which might have confounded the results of this study. However, an analysis of the same patients published elsewhere showed no significant effect of these countermeasures [25]. C677T and A1298C are only two mutations in the MTX metabolism pathway, although they are by far the most common. It is possible that other genetic mutations in the pathway might be associated with MTX intolerance; a variety of mutations have been tested on a similar, but smaller population with no association [15]. The complete lack of association of the two most common mutations shown in this study renders a significant contribution to MTX intolerance by less frequent mutations unlikely. The overall strength of this study is the prospective investigation of a large population of JIA patients, allowing confidence in ruling out possible associations between these two loci and MTX intolerance.

In conclusion, mutations in the MTHFR gene, and by extension levels of MTX and homocysteine, do not play a role in the genesis of MTX intolerance. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the unconditioned stimulus underlying the conditioned response to MTX that affects a large proportion of JIA patients on this medication.

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
German Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology (DZKJR)
(2)
Department of Rheumatology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center

References

  1. Hashkes PJ, Laxer RM. Medical treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. JAMA. 2005;294:1671–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Niehues T, Horneff G, Michels H, Hock MS, Schuchmann L, Working Groups Pediatric Rheumatology G, Pediatric Rheumatology A. Evidence-based use of methotrexate in children with rheumatic diseases: a consensus statement of the Working Groups Pediatric Rheumatology Germany (AGKJR) and Pediatric Rheumatology Austria. Rheumatol Int. 2005;25:169–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ortiz-Alvarez O, Morishita K, Avery G, Green J, Petty RE, Tucker LB, Malleson PN, Cabral DA. Guidelines for blood test monitoring of methotrexate toxicity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:2501–6.Google Scholar
  4. Murray KJ, Lovell DJ. Advanced therapy for juvenile arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2002;16:361–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Roscoe JA, Morrow GR, Aapro MS, Molassiotis A, Olver I. Anticipatory nausea and vomiting. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19:1533–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bulatovic M, Heijstek MW, Verkaaik M, van Dijkhuizen EH, Armbrust W, Hoppenreijs EP, Kamphuis S, Kuis W, Egberts TC, Sinnema G, Rademaker CM, Wulffraat NM. High prevalence of methotrexate intolerance in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: development and validation of a methotrexate intolerance severity score. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63:2007–13.Google Scholar
  7. Spyridopoulou KP, Dimou NL, Hamodrakas SJ, Bagos PG. Methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms and their association with methotrexate toxicity: a meta-analysis. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2012;22:117–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, Baum J, Glass DN, Goldenberg J, He X, Maldonado-Cocco J, Orozco-Alcala J, Prieur AM, Suarez-Almazor ME, Woo P. International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:390–2.Google Scholar
  9. Calasan MB, van den Bosch OF, Creemers MC, Custers M, Heurkens AH, van Woerkom JM, et al. Prevalence of methotrexate intolerance in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15:R217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Frosst P, Blom HJ, Milos R, Goyette P, Sheppard CA, Matthews RG, Boers GJ, den Heijer M, Kluijtmans LA, van den Heuvel LP, et al. A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Nat Genet. 1995;10:111–3.Google Scholar
  11. Reyes-Engel A, Munoz E, Gaitan MJ, Fabre E, Gallo M, Dieguez JL, Ruiz M, Morell M. Implications on human fertility of the 677C- > T and 1298A- > C polymorphisms of the MTHFR gene: consequences of a possible genetic selection. Mol Hum Reprod. 2002;8:952–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schneider JA, Rees DC, Liu YT, Clegg JB. Worldwide distribution of a common methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutation. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:1258–60.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. van der Put NM, Gabreels F, Stevens EM, Smeitink JA, Trijbels FJ, Eskes TK, van den Heuvel LP, Blom HJ. A second common mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: an additional risk factor for neural-tube defects? Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:1044–51.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Patil P, Parker RA, Rawcliffe C, Olaleye A, Moore S, Daly N, Sen D, Ioannou Y. Methotrexate-induced nausea and vomiting in adolescent and young adult patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33:403–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. van Dijkhuizen EH, Bulatovic Calasan M, Pluijm SM, de Rotte MC, Vastert SJ, Kamphuis S, de Jonge R, Wulffraat NM. Prediction of methotrexate intolerance in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a prospective, observational cohort study. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2015;13:5.Google Scholar
  16. Stockhorst U, Steingrueber HJ, Enck P, Klosterhalfen S. Pavlovian conditioning of nausea and vomiting. Auton Neurosci. 2006;129:50–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ramanan AV, Whitworth P, Baildam EM. Use of methotrexate in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88:197–200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Maetzel A, Wong A, Strand V, Tugwell P, Wells G, Bombardier C. Meta-analysis of treatment termination rates among rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;39:975–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Oguey D, Kolliker F, Gerber NJ, Reichen J. Effect of food on the bioavailability of low-dose methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:611–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kantar M, Kosova B, Cetingul N, Gumus S, Toroslu E, Zafer N, Topcuoglu N, Aksoylar S, Cinar M, Tetik A, Eroglu Z. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T and A1298C gene polymorphisms and therapy-related toxicity in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009;50:912–7.Google Scholar
  21. Chiusolo P, Reddiconto G, Farina G, Mannocci A, Fiorini A, Palladino M, La Torre G, Fianchi L, Sora F, Laurenti L, Leone G, Sica S. MTHFR polymorphisms’ influence on outcome and toxicity in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. Leuk Res. 2007;31:1669–74.Google Scholar
  22. Caliz R, del Amo J, Balsa A, Blanco F, Silva L, Sanmarti R, Martinez FG, Collado MD, Ramirez Mdel C, Tejedor D, Artieda M, Pascual-Salcedo D, Oreiro N, Andreu JL, Graell E, Simon L, Martinez A, Mulero J. The C677T polymorphism in the MTHFR gene is associated with the toxicity of methotrexate in a Spanish rheumatoid arthritis population. Scand J Rheumatol. 2012;41:10–4.Google Scholar
  23. Lee YH, Song GG. Associations between the C677T and A1298C polymorphisms of MTHFR and the efficacy and toxicity of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis. Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30:101–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Saleh MM, Irshaid YM, Mustafa KN. Methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase genotypes frequencies: association with toxicity and response to methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;53:154–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Scheuern A, Fischer N, Haas J-P, Hugle B. SAT0496 Countermeasures Against Methotrexate Intolerance in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Instituted by Parents Show no Effect. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:840.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Scheuern et al. 2016

Advertisement