Youth report of healthcare transition counseling and autonomy support from their rheumatologist
© Wells et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 August 2012
Accepted: 10 November 2012
Published: 14 November 2012
To increase understanding of the healthcare transition (HCT) process for young people living with Juvenile Idopathic Arthritis (JIA) by examining: 1) the extent to which youth report discussing HCT topics with their rheumatologist and 2) the association between youth perceptions of autonomy support from their rheumatologist and HCT discussions.
Data are from an online survey of youth in the United States with rheumatologic conditions (n= 134). HCT discussion was measured by 4 questions from the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs. Youth perception of autonomy support was measured using a validated 6-item scale.
One third of the youth (33.7%) reported talking to their rheumatologist about transferring to adult medicine. Less than half (40.8%) of respondents talked with their rheumatologist about adult healthcare needs, and less than a quarter (22.0%) discussed acquiring health insurance as an adult. Nearly two-thirds of respondents (62.7%) reported that their rheumatologist usually/always encourages self-care responsibility. Multivariate analyses revealed significant associations between rheumatologist support for youth autonomy and HCT counseling.
The low frequency of HCT counseling reported indicates a continuing need to increase awareness among rheumatologist in the USA. The strong associations between rheumatologist’s support for youth autonomy and HCT counseling suggest that developmentally “in-tune” providers may deliver the best guidance about transition planning for youth living with arthritis.
KeywordsHealthcare transition Autonomy support Adolescent health Young adult Arthritis Counseling Chronic condition
Advances in the treatments of many chronic conditions of childhood offer the promise of improved quality of life and a long and productive adulthood. In rheumatology, the biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs have resulted in marked reductions in disease activity and medication side effects for adolescents growing up with rheumatologic conditions like Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) . Despite these advances, no cure exists for these conditions and most adolescents can expect to experience adulthood with the need for intensive and expensive medical care [2–4]. Preparing youth and their families for the transition to adulthood and from pediatric to adult healthcare, called “healthcare transition” (HCT), through the support of healthcare providers and systems is an international priority [2, 5]. Changing systems and practice has proven to be difficult. The most recent US data demonstrate that little progress has been made over the past decade increasing the proportion of youth who have received HCT counseling from their providers; as of 2009 fewer than half of youth with special health care needs are receiving .
HCT counseling, guiding youth through the process of engaging in their healthcare self-management, is a recommended component of the adolescent health visit [7, 8]. But evidence on effective counseling strategies is lacking [9–11]. Best practice in pediatrics suggests adopting a family centered approach focusing on anticipatory guidance and medical care counseling. Providers who use a family centered approach are more likely to engage youth and families in HCT counseling . But attention to the developmental tasks of adolescence, individualization and autonomy, would suggest that counseling should, over time, support youth autonomy in self-management decision making and actions. Furthermore, autonomy support may be an important element of HCT counseling as it is identified as a central element of behavior change counseling and effective health behavior interventions [13, 14].
Within the context of parent report of low rates of HCT counseling  and a lack of evidence on effective strategies, we set out to inform practice and program development by: 1) assessing the extent to which youth with JA themselves report having been counseled by their healthcare provider on HCT; and 2) test the association between youth perception of autonomy support from their healthcare providers and the provision of HCT counseling.
Data and sample
We conducted a needs assessment survey, MyRheum, to assess the health, healthcare needs and quality of life of US youth (age 14–19) with rheumatologic conditions (n= 134) between June and December 2010. Our questionnaire was constructed by selecting and adapting (where necessary) items from frequently used questionnaires and standardized measures. The survey included questions about general and arthritis-related health, healthcare use, quality and satisfaction, in addition to other topics relevant to youth growing up with JA. Since no population based list of youth with rheumatologic conditions exists from which to draw a representative sample, and recruiting a sample of youth through clinics would likely introduce bias as we evaluated the unmet needs, we recruited a community based sample using multiple recruitment strategies. In addition to fliers and letters distributed to youth seen in 5 pediatric rheumatology clinics in the upper Midwest we distributed flyers through relevant community based organizations, and made postings to social media websites such as Facebook and sites with youth related and rheumatologic related content. Potential participants were directed to the study website where they could review study information, self-report eligibility criteria (age 14–19 years, have arthritis, and live in the US) and complete an online consent process. The Institutional Review Board at the University of Minnesota approved consent procedures, including a waiver of parental consent and a restriction to youth age 14 years and older. Only young people who met the eligibility criteria and completed the consent process could access the online questionnaire. On average, respondents completed the 66-item survey in 22 minutes (ranging from 7–84 minutes). Youth who completed the questionnaire were mailed a $10 gift card. Each case was reviewed for extensive missing data, inconsistencies or markers for potential ineligible participation. This review resulted in the elimination of 5 response sets.
Four questions, derived from the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs asked specifically about HCT counseling . These four questions are the dependent variables in this analysis. Respondents who reported seeing a pediatric rheumatologist were asked if they had discussed transferring care to a provider who treats adults. Then, all respondents were then asked whether they had discussed the following two questions with their rheumatologist: 1) how their healthcare needs in adulthood would change, and 2) about obtaining health insurance as an adult. Response options for these three questions were “yes” or “no.” Finally, participants were asked two transition related questions; 1)how often their rheumatologist or other provider encouraged them to take responsibility for their healthcare needs (e.g., taking medications, understanding their diagnosis, or following medical advice), with response options of “never,” “sometimes,” “usually,” and “always.” For ease of interpretation, responses were dichotomized into high (usually/always) and low (sometimes/never) levels of self-care responsibility and 2) whether, in the past 12 months, they had the chance to speak with their rheumatologist privately (“yes” or “no”).
The primary explanatory variable was participants’ perception of their rheumatologist’s support for autonomous medical care management. Autonomy support was measured by the 6-item version of the Healthcare Climate Questionnaire . A sample item is: “I feel that my physician has provided me choices and options.” Participants responded to the items on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree) and an overall score was calculated as the mean of the 6 items (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.95 in our sample). For ease of interpretation autonomy support was dichotomized using a median split into high (score that was at or above the median) and low levels (below the median).
Demographic variables included age (dichotomized as 14–16 and 17–19) to represent middle and late adolescence, sex, race/ethnicity, urban vs. rural residence (defined by postal code), and the number of parents or guardians in the household. The survey also asked participants to report their diagnoses (selecting more than one response was permitted from a list that included common and medical language to describe rheumatologic conditions associated with arthritis) and medications (check all that apply). The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory  (PedsQL™: 15 items, Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90) was used to assess disease impact and yielded scores ranging from 0–100. Scores on the PedsQL™ were also dichotomized using a median split.
We conducted univariate and bivariate analyses to describe sample characteristics and to examine group differences. We used logistic regression models to assess whether the association between autonomy support and each outcome noted in the bivariate analysis remained statistically significant and of the same directionand magnitude after adjusting for the potential cofounding of demographic characteristics. These regression models controlled for age, sex, race/ethnicity, residence, and PedsQL™ score. Analyses were conducted in PASW Statistics version 18 (IBM SPSS, Chicago, Illinois).
Sample Characteristics (n=134)
Age, years (median, 16)
14 - 16
17 - 19
Race/ethnicity (check all)
White or European American
Hispanic or Latino
Black, African, or African American
American Indian or Native American
Asian, Asian American or Pacific Islander
Other adult guardian
No parent or guardian
Reported diagnoses* (check all)
JIA or JRA
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis
Current medication use (check all)
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs
Transition counseling by youth characteristics and perception of autonomy support
Discussed seeing providers who treat adults (% yes)
Discussed healthcare needs of adults (% yes)
Discussed acquiring insurance as an adult (% yes)
Providers encourage self-care responsibility (% usually or always)
Provider support for autonomy remained positively associated with discussing healthcare needs in adulthood and encouraging self-responsibility in the logistic regression models, controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, urban/rural residence, and PedsQL™ score. Specifically, youth who reported high level of autonomy support were significantly more likely to report that discussions of the healthcare needs of adults occurred (AOR = 3.89, 95% CI = 1.75-8.69) and that their providers usually or always encouraged self-care responsibility (AOR = 3.97, 95% CI = 1.74-9.05) compared to youth reporting low level of autonomy-support. And the relationship between autonomy support and the outcomes of having discussions of insurance coverage or transfer to adult providers was not statistically significant in regression models.
Discussion and Conclusions
This survey provides a unique opportunity to examine HCT services from the perspective of youth themselves. There are two main findings from this study. First, based on youth report, we found low rates of discussing HCT issues by rheumatologists. Fewer than 4 in 10 youth recalled discussing health changes in adulthood, transfer to adult clinical care or maintaining health insurance coverage. Somewhat more encouraging, however, was that 6 in 10 youth reported that healthcare providers usually or always encouraged youth responsibility for healthcare. The validity of these findings is supported by the fact that they are remarkably consistent with reports from parents of children with arthritis . These results, together with those of other studies, suggest that the majority of youth living with arthritis are not discussing HCT even though it is considered best practice. The second key finding was that youth perceptions of autonomy support from their healthcare providers was associated with higher likelihood of discussing self-responsibility and discussing the changing healthcare needs of adults. Autonomy is an important psychosocial developmental task of adolescence . And autonomy support is increasingly recognized as an influential element of chronic care management. It appears that providers who youth perceive to be addressing this psychosocial task are the providers who are also providing developmentally appropriate healthcare services. Much of the HCT literature has advocated for clinical interventions that teach skills to youth living with chronic medical conditions, such as making appointments, reordering medications, and arranging the transfer of care to an adult service . But it may be that the strategy of asking providers to add more and specific health education to the long list of anticipatory guidance and health promotion tasks may be ineffective. Instead, a strategy that encourages providers to take a developmentally targeted approach to clinical work with youth health may result in more and perhaps more youth centered approaches to preparing for adulthood. Our finding of a strong association between provider support for autonomy and HCT discussions suggests that developmentally “in-tune” providers may be the best prepared to provide guidance about transition planning for youth living with JA.
Supporting autonomy in healthcare settings refers to the processes of care that enhance a person’s sense of personal choice of therapeutic plans and personal behaviors . Autonomy support is a key aspect of both patient centered care and adolescent development, and a key to successful healthcare transition. Healthcare providers can be autonomy supportive by seek to understand each adolescent’s experience of growing up with JIA, and involve them in identifying problems and resources, goals and strategies. The adolescent health interview strategy, HEADS , is one strategy that providers can use to become more patient centered and autonomy supportive. HEADS directs the adolescent health interview to areas of development and behavior that impact the current and future health of adolescents and which are likely to change over the transition to adulthood. HEADS topics include, but are not limited to Home, Education/Employment, Activities, Drugs, Depression, Sexuality, Safety. Conducting an interview in the HEADS order allows for exploration of topics in what are typically progressively more challenging topics. HEADS becomes a powerful autonomy support tool when the questions are used to trigger discussions of situations where an adolescent has successfully navigated a challenge, to elicit adolescent generated solutions and opportunities, and to model decision making. For example, the ‘home’ questions, “Tell me about your home and who you live with” become a patient centered, autonomy supportive transition intervention when they are expanded to include “How does having arthritis impact things around home?” or “How do you think that will change when you graduate high school?” or “Do you think having arthritis will affect your where you live when you go to college.” Autonomy support is enhance too, when adolescents have an opportunity to meet privately with their health care providers, and when they are assured confidentiality. Autonomy support in clinical settings with adolescents, especially those with chronic conditions, is challenging given the time constraints of visits and the focus on acute exacerbations and chronic management. Yet, the long term payoff from a program of autonomy support may be more efficient, effective and enjoyable patient communication and ultimately the successful transition to self-management and adult focused care.
The small sample size, sampling strategy and lack of sample heterogeneity limit the generalizability of our findings to the entire population of youth with arthritis. Our sample is primarily female, white and from two parent households and they all had access to a computer and the internet. It is likely that our sample represents, in general, a group with better access to resources than other youth with rheumatologic conditions. Thus we expect that our results may present a “best case” scenario in terms of the extent of healthcare transition counseling. Those youth with fewer resources may not be receiving as much in the way of transition services. In addition, results are derived from youth self-report and are not corroborated with medical records or provider reports. Thus, rates of counseling are subject to recall bias, and autonomy support is a perception of youth rather than an observed practice.
Further research on strategies for supporting young people during the process of HCT is necessary. Evidence to date has documented a strong need for HCT services, but there is little examination of the necessary components for effective programs . Our findings highlight the importance of supporting the development of autonomy in young people living with JA and suggest that support for autonomy is related to the HCT process. Future research should identify key markers of autonomy-supportiveness in clinical interactions between young people with JA and their providers as well as examine whether support for autonomy predicts successful HCT in youth who are at the stage where this transition is appropriate.
Study findings also point to an opportunity for providers and educators to focus on training current and future rheumatology professionals (and others) to be expert in delivering developmentally targeted, youth-centered care. Finally, training providers to engage in clinical interactions that cultivate autonomy may equip youth with the skills necessary to take control of their disease management and prepare for the transfer of care to adult providers.
Youth in the US report infrequent healthcare transition counseling from their rheumatologist.
Rheumatologists’ support for healthcare autonomy in young people is associated with HCT counseling
Improving clinician’s attention to the developmentally relevant autonomy supportive counseling may improve HCT counseling
This work was supported by the United States Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau through the Leadership Education in Adolescent Health Fellowship Training Program, [T71-MC-00006] to CKW and BJM); Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [K08-HS015511, to PBS] and from the University of Minnesota-Academic Health Center Faculty Research Development Program [to PBS, AWG, KJH]
This work reflects the opinions of the authors and does not represent the opinions or influences of any of the funding agencies.
- Gartlehner G, Hansen R, Jonas B, Thieda P, Lohr K: Biologics for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and critical analysis of the evidence. Clin Rheumatol. 2008, 27 (1): 67-76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McDonagh JE: Transition of care from paediatric to adult rheumatology. Arch Dis Child. 2007, 92 (9): 802-807. 10.1136/adc.2006.103796.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wallace CA, Huang B, Bandeira M, Ravelli A, Giannini EH: Patterns of clinical remission in select categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005, 52 (11): 3554-3562. 10.1002/art.21389.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bernatsky S, Duffy C, Malleson P, Feldman DE, St. Pierre Y, Clarke AE: Economic impact of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2007, 57 (1): 44-48. 10.1002/art.22463.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chira P, Sandborg C: Adolescent rheumatology transitional care: steps to bringing health policy into practice. Rheumatology. 2004, 43 (6): 687-689. 10.1093/rheumatology/keh206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative: MCHB Core Outcome #6:CSHCN Youth receive services needed for transition to adulthood (ages 12–17 only). [National Map]: Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative; 2012 [cited 2012 6/12/12]; Maps of outcome # 6, for 2005 and 8]. 2012, Available from: http://childhealthdata.org/browse/rankings/maps?s=6 and http://childhealthdata.org/browse/rankings/maps?s=61, [cited 2012 6/12/12]; Maps of outcome # 6, for 2005 and 8]Google Scholar
- Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents; 3rd Edition. Edited by: Hagan J, Shaw J, Duncan P. 2008, Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of PediatricsGoogle Scholar
- Sawyer SM, Aroni RA: Self-management in adolescents with chronic illness. What does it mean and how can it be achieved?. Med J Aust. 2005, 183 (8): 405-409. Epub 2005/10/18PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bloom SR, Kuhlthau K, Van Cleave J, Knapp AA, Newacheck P, Perrin JM: Health care transition for youth with special health care needs. J Adolesc Health. 2012, 51 (3): 213-219. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.01.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cooley WC, Sagerman PJ: Supporting the health care transition from adolescence to adulthood in the medical home. Pediatrics. 2011, 128 (1): 182-200. Epub 2011/06/29View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sawyer SM, Macnee S: Transition to adult health care for adolescents with spina bifida: research issues. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2010, 16 (1): 60-65. 10.1002/ddrr.98. Epub 2010/04/27View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duke N, Scal P: Adult care transitioning for adolescents with special health care needs: a pivotal role for family centered care. Matern Child Health J. 2011, 15 (1): 98-105. 10.1007/s10995-009-0547-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deci E, Ryan R: Self-determination theory in health care and its relations to motivational interviewing: a few comments. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012, 9 (1): 24-10.1186/1479-5868-9-24.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Williams G: Improving patients' health through supporting the autonomy of patients and providers. Handbook of self-determination research. Edited by: Deco EL Ryan R. 2002, Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 233-254.Google Scholar
- Scal P, Horvath K, Garwick A: Preparing for adulthood: health care transition counseling for youth with arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2009, 61 (1): 52-57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blumberg S, Welch E, Chowdhury S, Upchurch H, Parker E, Skalland B: Design and operation of the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs, 2005–2006. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2008, 1 (45):Google Scholar
- Williams GC, McGregor HA, King D, Nelson CC, Glasgow RE: Variation in perceived competence, glycemic control, and patient satisfaction: relationship to autonomy support from physicians. Patient Educ Couns. 2005, 57 (1): 39-45. 10.1016/j.pec.2004.04.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS: PedsQL(TM) 4.0: reliability and validity of the pediatric quality of life inventory(TM) version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001, 39 (8): 800-812. 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spear HJ, Kulbok P: Autonomy and adolescence: a concept analysis. Public Health Nurs. 2004, 21 (2): 144-152. 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2004.021208.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goldenring J, Cohen E: Getting into adolescent heads. Contemp Pediatr. 1988, 5 (7): 75-90.Google Scholar
- Reiss JG, Gibson RW, Walker LR: Health care transition: youth, family, and provider perspectives. Pediatrics. 2005, 115 (1): 112-120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.