Skip to main content

Table 1 Included papers on diagnosis, biomarkers and treatment of MAS in sJIA patients

From: Evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of macrophage activation syndrome in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Authors

Year

Number of sJIA patients with MAS

Subject

Content

Evaluation design

Results

Conclusion

Limitations

LOE [13]

Ravelli et al.[3]

2005

74

diagnosis

Diagnostic criteria of MAS

Comparative study

A set of preliminary clinical and laboratory criteria of MAS in sJIA.

Preliminary Ravelli criteria [Table 3].

Not validated, lacks ferritin as parameter.

3

Davi et al.[18]

2014

362

diagnosis

Assessment of performance of diagnostic guidelines

Retrospective study

The preliminary Ravelli criteria perform better than the HLH-2004 guidelines in differentiating MAS from active sJIA or infection (by adding ferritin as parameter).

The preliminary diagnostic criteria perform better than the HLH-2004 guidelines.

Retrospective study design, selection bias

3

Minoia et al.[16]

2014

362

diagnosis

Disease features of MAS in sJIA

Descriptive study

Decreased platelet counts and increased ASAT, triglycerides, ferritin and LDH levels were the most common laboratory features during onset of MAS. Fever and organomegaly were the most frequent clinical symptoms.

The clinical spectrum of MAS in sJIA comprises frequently reported clinical and laboratory features.

Retrospectively collected data, possible selection bias.

3

Minoia et al.[19]

2015

362

diagnosis

Clinical heterogeneity of MAS in sJIA

Descriptive study

Clinical and laboratory features of MAS in sJIA did not differ among patients registered from different geographic locations.

The clinical spectrum of MAS is comparable across patients from different geographic locations.

Retrospectively collected data, possible selection bias.

3

Ravelli et al.[21]

2015

362

diagnosis

Cross-validated literature- and consensus based diagnostic guidelines for MAS in sJIA

Comparative study complemented with expert opinion

A final set of diagnostic (laboratory) criteria was approved based on the selection of best classification criteria through statistical analyses and consensus formation techniques with a higher sensitivity and specificity compared to the preliminary Ravelli criteria.

Best performing set of diagnostic criteria for MAS in sJIA [Table 3].

Not prospectively validated, level of evidence low due to incorporation of expert opinion.

3/4

Kostik et al.[22]

2015

18

diagnosis

Diagnostic criteria

Comparative study

Laboratory criteria were more precise in discriminating MAS from active sJIA than clinical variables. Eight widely available laboratory markers were selected as best for early identification of MAS.

Preliminary diagnostic criteria.

Retrospective, no evaluation of changes in laboratory parameters.

3

Lehmberg et al.[23]

2013

27

diagnosis

Differentiating MAS in sJIA from HLH

Retrospective study

Generally available laboratory measures with accessory cut-off values to distinguish MAS complicating sJIA from primary HLH and virus-associated HLH (VA-HLH) were retrospectively identified.

Neutrophil counts >1.8 x 109/L, CRP >90 mg/L and sCD25 <7900 U/ml indicate MAS in sJIA rather than primary HLH or VA-HLH.

No control group, no cut-off points.

3

Grom et al.[24]

2002

7

biomarkers

NK cell function

Comparative study

NK cell activity was decreased in all patients compared to healthy controls. Low NK cell activity was associated with decreased numbers of NK cells.

NK dysfunction is common in sJIA associated MAS

Small patient sample.

3

Bleesing et al.[25]

2007

7

biomarkers

sCD25, sCD163

Comparative study

sCD25 and sCD163 were significantly higher in the acute phase of MAS compared to untreated new-onset sJIA patients and correlated with disease activity.

sCD35 and sCD163 are promising biomarkers of MAS

Small number of patients, not validated

3

Reddy et al.[26]

2014

2

biomarkers

sCD25, sCD163 as markers of subclinical MAS in active sJIA

Comparative study

Laboratory abnormalities associated with MAS were seen in active sJIA patients with elevated levels of sCD25 and to a lesser extend in patients with elevated levels of sCD163.

sCD25 might be a marker of subclinical MAS in active sJIA.

Only 2 MAS patients, not validated

3

Gorelic et al.[27]

2013

7

biomarkers

FSTL-1, ferritin/ESR ratio

Comparative study

FSTL-1 levels during MAS are elevated compared to active sJIA. Elevated levels of FSTL-1 were associated with occult MAS, correlated with levels of sCD25 and ferritin and normalized after treatment. Ferritin/ESR ratio was superior to ferritin in discriminating MAS from new-onset sJIA.

Elevated levels of FSTL-1 might be a marker of occult MAS.

FSTL-1 is unspecific, small sample size, not validated

3

Shimizu et al.[8]

2010

5

biomarkers

IL-6, IL-18, neopterin for differentiating MAS in sJIA from VA-HLH or KD

Comparative study

IL-18 was significantly higher in MAS in sJIA compared to EBV-HLH or KD and correlated with measures of disease activity. IL-6 was higher in KD patients and neopterin was higher in EBV-HLH.

Serum cytokine profiles differ between MAS in sJIA, KD and EBV-HLH. IL-18 might be useful for differentiation of MAS in sJIA from HLH.

Small sample, not validated

3

Shimizu et al.[12]

2012

5

biomarkers

IL-18, IL-6 during TCZ treatment

Comparative study

TCZ can suppress clinical symptoms of MAS. IL-18 and IL-6 were elevated during MAS in patients with and without TCZ and correlated with disease activity.

During TCZ treatment, monitoring IL-18 and IL-6 could be useful to disclose early MAS.

Only 5 MAS patients, not validated

3

Yokota et al.[28]

2015

14

biomarkers

Changes in laboratory markers in patients with MAS receiving TCZ

Retrospective Descriptive study

Most patients had common laboratory features associated with MAS.

Clinical and laboratory features of MAS appear similar among patients with and without TCZ treatment.

No control group, retrospective

3

Shimizu et al.[29]

2015

15

biomarkers

Serum IL-18 as biomarker for the prediction of MAS in sJIA

Comparative study

During active sJIA, IL-18 levels >47750 pg/ml predicted development of MAS. IL-6 levels in patients with MAS did not differ from IL-6 levels during active sJIA in absence of MAS.

Serum IL-18 levels > 47750 pg/ml might be a biomarker for MAS development

High cut-off values suggest low sensitivity

3

Kounami et al.[30]

2005

5

biomarkers

urine β2-microglobulin

Descriptive study

Urinary β2-microglobulin levels increased during MAS.

Increases in urinary β2-microglobuline might be an indicator of MAS.

No control group, small sample size, not specific

3

Sawhney et al.[6]

2001

8

treatment

steroids, CsA, eto

Case-series

Patients received steroids as part of a combinational regimen, of which >62% in combination with CsA.

High dose steroids in combination with CsA was effective in cases of MAS.

Small retrospective case-series

3

Mouy et al.[35]

1996

5

treatment

steroids, CsA

Case-series

CsA monotherapy was effective in 7 episodes of MAS and was effective in 3 episodes of steroid-resistant MAS.

CsA can be effective as first or second line (mono) therapy.

Small retrospective case-series

3

Stephan et al.[1]

2001

18

treatment

steroids, CsA, IVIG, eto

Case-series

CsA as initial monotherapy induced remission in 5 cases. CsA was effective in 6 cases of steroid-resistant MAS. Steroids were effective as first-line (mono) therapy. IVIG was not effective.

CsA and steroids were effective as first-line monotherapy or combined.

Small retrospective case-series

3

Miettunen et al.[37]

2011

8

treatment

Anakinra

Case-series

Anakinra was effective in 8 cases of conventional therapy- resistant MAS.

Anakinra was effective in cases where initial therapy with steroids and CsA failed.

Small retrospective case-series

3

Ramanan et al.[31]

2004

3

treatment

(pulse) steroids, eto

Case-series

Steroid monotherapy was effective in 3 patients with MAS with renal involvement.

Steroids can be effective as monotherapy in patients with renal involvement complicating MAS.

Small retrospective case-series

3

Lin et al.[2]

2012

4

treatment

steroids, IVIG, CsA

Case-series

Prednisolone was effective as monotherapy or in combination with CsA. IVIG was not effective.

Patients responded well to steroids and CsA.

Small retrospective case-series

3

Kounami et al.[30]

2005

5

treatment

steroids, IVIG, CsA

Case-series

All patients treated with CsA as first or second line therapy responded well. IVIG failed as first-line treatment.

CsA was effective as first-line (mono) therapy.

Small retrospective case-series

3

Singh et al.[11]

2011

6

treatment

steroids, IVIG

Case-series

Four patients responded to high dose methylprednisolone, 1 patient recovered after addition of IVIG to steroids.

Steroids were effective as initial monotherapy.

Small retrospective case-series

3

Cortis et al.[36]

2006

9

treatment

steroids, CsA, etanercept

Case-series

7 cases of MAS responded to high dose steroids with or without CsA. In one patient, a third episode of MAS responded to etanercept when steroids and CsA failed.

Patients responded well to steroids and CsA.

Small retrospective case-series

3

Zeng et al.[32]

2008

13

treatment

steroids, eto, VCR, IVIG

Case-series

Steroids were effective as first-line (mono) therapy. 1 patient responded to eto after steroids, CsA and IVIG failed.

Steroids were effective as first-line (mono) therapy.

Small retrospective case-series

3

Nakagishi et al.[34]

2014

3

treatment

Dexamethasone palmitate

Case-series

All three patients were resistant to methylprednisolone but responded well to dexamethasone palmitate.

DexP can be effective in mps-resistant MAS.

Small case-series

3

  1. Abbreviations: LOE level of evidence; MAS Macrophage Activation Syndrome; sJIA systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis; ASAT aspartate aminotransferase; LDH lactate dehydrogenase; HLH hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; CRP C-reactive protein; VA-HLH virus-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; FSTL-1 Follistatin-related protein 1; ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate; EBV-HLH Epstein-Barr related hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; KD Kawasaki disease; TCZ Tocilizumab; CsA cyclosporine A; VCR vincristine; IVIG intravenous immunoglobulin; eto etoposide; DexP Dexamethasone palmitate