Primary Raynaud's phenomenon in an infant: a case report and review of literature

  • Anjali A Sharathkumar1Email author and

    Affiliated with

    • Paul Castillo-Caro2

      Affiliated with

      Pediatric Rheumatology20119:16

      DOI: 10.1186/1546-0096-9-16

      Received: 3 November 2010

      Accepted: 18 July 2011

      Published: 18 July 2011

      Abstract

      Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is an extremely unusual finding in early infancy. In the present report we describe a one-month-old previously healthy male infant who presented with unilateral acrocyanosis. Although infantile acrocyanosis is known to be a benign and self-resolving condition, it is generally bilateral and symmetric. The unilateral nature of the acrocyanosis was an atypical finding in this infant. Consequently, he was closely monitored to evaluate the progression of his acrocyanosis. Based on his benign clinical course and failure to demonstrate other etiologies contributing to his acrocyanosis, he was diagnosed to have primary RP. Due to the rarity of RP in children, we review the progress in understanding the pathophysiology, epidemiology and management of RP and additionally discuss the differential diagnosis of unilateral and bilateral acrocyanosis in infants.

      Background

      Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) was first described by Maurice Raynaud in 1862 [1]. Classically, the initial description of RP involved triphasic color changes in the digits, with blanching (white) leading to cyanosis (blue) followed by reactive hyperemia (red) [2, 3]. However, it has been realized that not every patient experiences all 3 phases of color change and the majority of patients present with uniphasic color change involving an isolated bluish discoloration of digits commonly known as acrocyanosis [46]. Unlike RP, acrocyanosis is a common phenomenon in infants and young children [47]. Acrocyanosis is generally bilateral, symmetric and involves hands and feet. Since infantile acrocyanosis is a benign and self-resolving condition, it does not require medical attention [7, 8]. Rarely, acrocyanosis in infants can be caused by RP and may require immediate medical attention to prevent complications of RP [913]. In this report, we describe an infant who initially presented with unilateral acrocyanosis and was diagnosed to have primary RP based on his subsequent clinical course. In view of the rarity of RP in infants and young children, the literature about RP is reviewed with a specific focus on the pediatric population. To help differentiate benign acrocyanosis from acrocyanosis associated with other serious conditions, the differential diagnosis of unilateral and bilateral acrocyanosis in infants is also discussed.

      Case report

      A one-month-old healthy male infant was brought to his pediatrician's office for the evaluation of bluish to blackish discoloration of his left hand. His mother incidentally noted this color change while she was changing his diaper. She did not recall any trauma or insect bite. She denied using naphthalene balls in the storage area for the infant's clothes. This history was helpful to exclude methemoglobinemia as exposure to naphthalene balls can cause infantile acrocyanosis [7]). He was breast-fed and his mother was the primary care taker. The infant's birth history was unremarkable except for neonatal physiological jaundice treated with phototherapy for 5 days. His past history was noteworthy only for a history of constipation. His family history was significant for ischemic heart disease at a young age (< 55 years old) in multiple members of his father's family. His father died at the age of 42 years due to a massive myocardial infarction. His mother had a history of migraines. He had three healthy siblings (three brothers, ages 11, 10 and 8 years).

      Upon arrival at the outside hospital, he was an alert and healthy infant in no acute distress. His physical examination was normal including vital signs, growth and development except for acrocyanosis of his left hand with a clear demarcation at the wrist. His left palm was cooler than the rest of the extremities with sluggish capillary refill (~3 seconds). The peripheral and central pulses were equal and regular bilaterally. He was able to move all the extremities without any pain. The elevated arm stress test was negative for worsening of cyanosis or weakening of the radial pulse, thereby lessening the possibility of thoracic outlet syndrome. He was referred to a tertiary pediatric facility where he was admitted for further evaluation.

      Evaluation during hospitalization

      Upper extremity duplex ultrasound, MRI/MRA/MRV of head, neck and left upper extremity were performed to rule out anatomical disturbances in vascular supply. Each test was negative. These results excluded several conditions, including thromboembolism, thoracic outlet syndrome contributing to compression of subclavian vein, vascular anomalies, and the presence of a mass or tumors in the region of cervical plexus including the stellate ganglion. A transthoracic echocardiogram confirmed normal cardiac anatomy and did not demonstrate any intracardiac mass, thrombus, or vegetation to suggest an embolic source for a presumed thrombotic event.

      He underwent blood tests to detect infection and other systemic causes of acrocyanosis such as methemoglobinemia, polycythemia, antiphospholipid antibodies, and other hypercoagulable conditions. The complete blood count and comprehensive metabolic panel were normal. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) tests were also normal. His newborn screen for inborn errors of metabolism and hemoglobinopathies was negative. His coagulation tests (PT and aPTT) were normal and antiphospholipid antibodies and antinuclear antibody (ANA) assays were negative. He also underwent testing for inherited thrombophilia such as factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin gene mutation, and methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutation. Results were positive for homozygosity for a MTHFR C677T mutation with normal homocysteine levels.

      Due to the concerns about the transplacental transfer of maternal antibodies contributing to development of RP in this young infant, it was decided to evaluate his mother for other medical conditions associated with RP [1416]. Her blood work up revealed no evidence for systemic lupus erythematosus (antiphospholipid antibodies, ANA, antidsDNA), scleroderma (antitopoisomerase 1 antibodies) or cryoglobulinemia (cryoglobulin levels).

      Course during hospitalization and outpatient follow up

      At admission, he was begun on low molecular weight heparin (LMWH, dose: 1 mg/kg/dose, q 12 hourly) due to the concerns of a thromboembolic event. He showed gradual improvement in discoloration of his hands over next 72-hours. Since there was no evidence of thromboembolism, his LMWH treatment was discontinued after three days and it was decided to follow him closely in an outpatient clinic without any further medical intervention. Over the next few months he continued to have 1-2 self-resolving episodes of acrocyanosis per month, involving both hands along with bluishness of tip of the nose, lips, ears and periumbilical area and each lasting for a few minutes to an hour. They were not associated with cold exposure but were felt to be precipitated by abdominal colic due to constipation. At 9 months of age his initial tests for SLE, and other rheumatic diseases was repeated. This evaluation was normal.

      Based on his clinical course, he was diagnosed to have "primary Raynaud's phenomenon". His treatment included laxatives for constipation and close clinical monitoring. Over the next one year, he continued to have occasional episodes of acrocyanosis without any medical consequences. At his last follow up (age 2 years), his growth and development was normal (length and weight at 90th percentile).

      Discussion

      The infant described in this report presented with a unilateral acrocyanosis at one month of age. He was diagnosed to have primary RP at 9 months. This diagnosis was based on his clinical course and exclusion of other causes of unilateral acrocyanosis including vascular anomalies, thromboembolism and thoracic outlet syndrome. (Table 1) [7]. Even though acrocyanosis is very common condition in newborn period, involvement of only one hand was an atypical finding for infantile acrocyanosis. This finding provided a clue to consider the possibility of RP in the differential diagnosis.
      Table 1

      Causes of acrocyanosis

      Type of acrocyanosis

      Causes

      Unilateral acrocyanosis

       
       

      Local trauma/digital injury

       

      Local infection: Paronechia

       

      Raynaud's phenomenon

       

      Thoracic outlet syndrome

       

      Carpel Tunnel syndrome

       

      Cervical tumors compressing neurovascular bundle*

      e.g. Neuroblastoma, stellate ganglion tumor

       

      Thromboembolism of arteries of palmar arch

       

      Frostbite

       

      Reflex Sympathetic dystrophy

      Bilateral acrocyanosis**

       
       

      Benign acrocyanosis of infancy

       

      Frostbite

       

      Pernio

       

      Raynaud's phenomenon

       

      Reflex sympathetic dystrophy

       

      Hypoxemia**

       

      Congenital cyanotic heart disease**

       

      Methemoglobinemia**

       

      Purpura fulminans

       

      Pheochromocytoma

      *: Need to look for other signs of Horner's syndrome on the ipsilateral side of the face (ptosis, anhydrosis, miosis of pupil or unequal pupils, poor light reflex and enopthalmos);**: Need close clinical evaluation for presence of central cyanosis.

      Over the last decade significant advances have been made in understanding the pathophysiology of RP [1721]. Irrespective of the underlying etiology, RP is manifested via vasospasm of the small muscular arteries and arterioles of the digits [18]. Similar to benign acrocyanosis of infancy, RP is also triggered by exposure to cold and emotional stress. It can be asymmetric and may last longer than benign acrocyanosis. Based on the available data, an over- activity of the sympathetic nervous system along with an imbalance of vasodilator and vasocontrictor substances may be the most likely etiology for RP [18]. In patients with RP, digital cutaneous neurons show a deficient release of a potent vasodilator, the calcitonin-gene related peptide. This primary pathology may be exaggerated by other factors as well, some of which are influenced by cold or emotional triggers. For example, in response to cold, various vasoconstricting substances such as catecholamines, endothelin-1, and 5-hydroxytryptamine are released. These chemical mediators could cause digital artery vasoconstriction and the symptoms of RP. In some cases, this could trigger a cascade of neutrophil and platelet activation, which through the release of inflammatory agents such as endothelin-1 and TNF-alpha, contribute to the endothelial damage seen with more severe RP [21]. There is some suggestion that elevated levels of homocysteine, a sulfur amino acid that is proposed as an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis, may have an association with RP [17, 22, 23]. RP appears to have a strong familial component suggesting a genetic link, though this link is yet to be clarified [20]. It is also unclear if constipation can exaggerate the imbalance of vasodilator and vascontrictor substances.

      Raynaud's phenomenon is traditionally classified as 'primary' (previously known as Raynaud's disease) or 'secondary' [24]. Primary RP is diagnosed when it occurs in the absence of associated diseases. In contrast, secondary RP is diagnosed in the presence of a well-defined disease states such as SLE, polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) or scleroderma (Table 2). [2528] Primary RP is generally a benign condition [13], but secondary RP can lead to significant morbidity, including digital gangrene [29] and may be life-threatening [9]. Of those patients with primary RP, ~13% of patients will eventually be diagnosed to have secondary RP [11]. Although it is difficult to predict which patients will be eventually diagnosed to have secondary RP, children with secondary RP can show changes in their nailfold capillaries. The direct observation of the nailfold microvasculature with videocapillaroscopy is useful for suspecting secondary RP earlier during the clinical course [30, 31]. Generally, the presence of giant capillaries, avascular fields and irregular architecture of nailfold capillaries is predictive of the development of SLE, PAN, or scleroderma in patients with RP [32]. According to Allen and Brown's criteria of minimum diagnosis, a negative antinuclear antibody titer and negative findings on capillaroscopy are the most reliable way to distinguish between primary and secondary RP [33]. Since our patient's clinical presentation (age, sex, clinical features) and blood workup was consistent with primary RP, he was not evaluated for capillary nailfold abnormalities.
      Table 2

      Causes of Raynaud's phenomenon

      Category

      Disease conditions

      Connective tissue/autoimmune disorders

      Scleroderma,

      Dematomyositis,

      Systemic lupus erythematosus,

      Rheumatoid arthritis,

      Sjogren's syndrome

      Antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA) syndrome

      Polyarteritis nodosa

      Repetitive trauma

      Work involving tools with vibrations

      Drugs

      Interferon-alpha,

      Bleomycin

      Ergotamine

      Infections

      Helicobacter Pylori

      Parvovirus B19

      Metabolic

      Atherosclerosis

      Cryoglobulinemia

      Hyperhomocysteinemia

      Chemical exposure

      Vinyl chloride exposure in plastic industry

      Smoking

      Other

      Carpal-tunnel syndrome

      CREST* syndrome

      * CREST: calcinosis, Raynaud's phenomenon, esophageal dysmotility, sclerodactyly, and telangiectasia.

      Since RP is extremely rare in children, specifically in infants, the knowledge about its epidemiology, clinical spectrum and the natural evolution is quite limited [9, 1113, 29, 34]. The first description of RP in children appeared in 1967, almost 100 years after the initial description of RP by Raynaud in 1862 [1]. This report described a series of 6 children (ages, 2.5 to 5 years) with classic RP [13]. Since 1967, there are only a handful of reports of RP in children [9, 11, 29, 34]. In general, female children are more predisposed to development of RP and the onset of RP generally occurs around menarche implying the influence of ovarian hormones in the pathogenesis of this entity [4, 11, 34]. Primary RP is more common in children than secondary RP [11, 34]. Earlier reports in children suggest the association of RP with rheumatic diseases in children [34, 36]. Similar to adult literature, pediatric studies suggest that positive ANA and abnormalities of nailfold capillaries may be associated with secondary RP [34].

      The largest cohort study in children provided more insight into the epidemiology of RP in children and showed that RP is highly heterogeneous in children [11]. Although exposure to cold was the primary trigger in the majority, (~70% of children) ~10% did not have any known trigger. Primary RP followed a bimodal pattern of age of onset affecting young infants and teenage population. Half of these children experienced additional symptoms such as pain, tingling, and numbness. Interestingly, 11% (9/82) of children with primary RP were lmisdiagnosed as "acrocyanosis" and 4 of them were younger than 2 years of age. These 4 children uniformly experienced monophasic or biphasic color change involving the whole hand, foot, or both under the influence of cold or without an apparent cause. There are only two case reports describing the RP in infants [9, 29]. Both these infants presented at 5 months of age with severe disease and required treatment with vasodilators. A patient reported by Sayre initially presented with predominant involvement of right foot [29]. Her symptoms were uniphasic and lasted for 72 hours prior to presentation. At the age of 9 months, she showed involvement of fingers as well. An infant described by Krigel et al. [9], presented with acrocyanosis of toes for 3 days prior to admission and showed classic RP with triphasic color changes. The infant progressed to the development of digital gangrene. This patient died at the age of 8 months due to vasomotor collapse. Her autopsy studies revealed the diagnosis of PAN thus supporting secondary RP as the underlying cause of her acrocyanosis. Our patient presented at an earlier age with mild symptoms but his cyanosis lasted for almost 48-72 hours, similar to both these cases. As transient APLAs have been described in pregnant women [37], our initial work up was focused on evaluating him and his mother for these antibodies to rule out transplacental transfer of these antibodies contributing to the clinical presentation.

      Our patient was evaluated for genetic risk factors of thrombosis due to the concerns about unilateral thrombosis at his presentation and the family history of young age heart attacks [38]. He was homozygous for MTHFR C677T mutation. MTHFR mutation can be associated with hyperhomocysteinemia [39] and high homocysteine levels are shown to be associated with decreased vasodilation both in animal models [40] and in humans [41]. On the same note, patients with RP are shown to have elevated homocysteine levels compared to normal controls [42]. In our case the patient's homocyteine levels were normal, making this a less likely etiology for his RP. However, whether MTHFR mutation in itself plays a direct role in vascular instability is yet to be clarified.

      Our patient was also evaluated for systemic causes of central cyanosis such as methemoglobinemia and congenital cyanotic heart disease. Generally this evaluation is not required for children with unilateral acrocyanosis. However, maternal anxiety and inability to provide a long-term prognosis of this infant forced the medical team to perform the extensive evaluation. Although during two-years of follow up, there was no indication of the other disorders which might be causal for the development of RP, it is possible that in future his underlying condition may become clinically evident.

      Management of RP is generally supportive and relies upon its accurate diagnosis. The mild forms of primary RP can be controlled by non-pharmacologic approaches such as avoidance of exposure to cold or emotional stress. In moderate to severe cases, vasodilator therapy including calcium channel blockers, either systemic or topical, is required to relieve the vasospasm. Rarely prostacycline infusions [43], antiplatelet agents [44, 45] and antithrombotic therapies [46] have been used with variable success.

      Surgery is reserved for extreme cases and generally involves digital sympathectomy [47]. In the severe forms of the disorder, intravenous infusion of prostacyclin as well as endothelin-1 receptor antagonists and specific inhibitors of phosphodiesterase-5 are emerging as the treatment of choice [48, 49]. Investigational agents for the treatment of RP include selective alpha-2c adrenergic receptor blockers, inhibitors of protein tyrosine kinase and Rho-kinase, as well as calcitonin gene-related peptide. In patients with secondary RP, treatment of underlying disease is critical to control the episodes of RP.

      Conclusion

      This case report highlights that despite an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of RP, the diagnosis of primary RP in infants is challenging and It can take weeks to months to confirm the diagnosis. The rarity of its occurrence in infants, the similarities in clinical presentation between primary RP and benign acrocyanosis of infancy, and the absence of diagnostic tests confirming the diagnosis of primary RP contribute to delay in the diagnosing of RP. Clinical clues that should alert the clinician to suspect RP in infancy include the presence of atypical features such as a prolonged acrocyanosis episode (> 72 hours) and/or a unilateral acrocyanosis. A high index of suspicion and close clinical monitoring is required to ensure an accurate diagnosis and appropriate clinical management.

      Consent

      Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

      Conflict of interest

      The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

      Contributions of Authors

      PC and AS conceived the idea and wrote the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

      List of abbreviations

      ANA: 

      Antinuclear antibodies

      ANCA: 

      Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies

      APLA: 

      Antiphospholipid antibodies

      CRP: 

      C-reactive proteins

      ESR: 

      Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

      LMWH: 

      Low Molecular Weight Heparin

      MTHFR: 

      Methylene Tetrahydrofolate reductase

      MRI: 

      Magnetic Resonance Imaging

      MRA: 

      Magnetic Resonance Angiogram

      MRV: 

      Magnetic Resonance Venography

      ANCA: 

      Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies

      PAN: 

      Polyarteritis nodosa

      PT: 

      Prothrombin time

      aPTT: 

      Activated Partial thromboplastin time

      RP: 

      Raynaud's phenomenon

      TNF: 

      Tumor necrosis factor.

      Authors’ Affiliations

      (1)
      Department of Pediatrics, Children's Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine
      (2)
      Department of Pediatrics, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine

      References

      1. Raynaud M: On local asphyxia and symmetrical gangrene of the extremities [1862]. New researches on the nature and treatment of local asphyxia of the extremities [1874]. trans Selected monographs. Edited by: Barlow T. 1988, London: New Sydenham Society
      2. Allen EV, Brown GE: Raynaud's disease: a critical review of minimal requisites for diagnosis. Am J Med Sci. 1932, 183: 187-200. 10.1097/00000441-193202000-00004.View Article
      3. Summers A: From white to blue to red: Raynaud's phenomenon. Emergency Nurse. 2005, 13: 18-20. 10.1016/j.aaen.2004.10.010.View ArticlePubMed
      4. Block JA, Sequeira W: Raynaud's phenomenon. Lancet. 2001, 357: 2042-2048. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05118-7.View ArticlePubMed
      5. Ho M, Belch JJ: Raynaud's phenomenon: state of the art 1998. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology. 1998, 27: 319-322. 10.1080/03009749850154311.View ArticlePubMed
      6. Wigley FM: Clinical practice. Raynaud's Phenomenon. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002, 347: 1001-1008. 10.1056/NEJMcp013013.View ArticlePubMed
      7. DiMaio AM, Singh J: The infant with cyanosis in the emergency room. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 2006, 39: 987-1006.
      8. Charkoudian N: Skin blood flow in adult human thermoregulation: how it works, when it does not, and why. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2003, 78: 603-612. 10.4065/78.5.603.View ArticlePubMed
      9. Krieger I, Brough AJ: Raynaud's phenomenon in an infant. Journal of Pediatrics. 1972, 80: 145-151. 10.1016/S0022-3476(72)80474-8.View ArticlePubMed
      10. De Angelis R, Del Medico P, Blasetti P, Cervini C: Raynaud's phenomenon: clinical spectrum of 118 patients. Clinical Rheumatology. 2003, 22: 279-284. 10.1007/s10067-003-0726-1.View ArticlePubMed
      11. Nigrovic PA, Fuhlbrigge RC, Sundel RP: Raynaud's phenomenon in children: a retrospective review of 123 patients. Pediatrics. 2003, 111: 715-721. 10.1542/peds.111.4.715.View ArticlePubMed
      12. Sheldon WB, Lurie DP, Maricq HR, Kahaleh MB, DeLustro FA, Gibofsky A, LeRoy EC: Three siblings with scleroderma (systemic sclerosis) and two with Raynaud's phenomenon from a single kindred. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 1981, 24: 668-676. 10.1002/art.1780240507.View Article
      13. Guntheroth WG, Morgan BC, Harbinson JA, Mullins GL: Raynaud's disease in children. Circulation. 1967, 36: 724-729.View ArticlePubMed
      14. Abuaf N, Laperche S, Carsique R, Meyer O, Deschamps A, Rajoely B, Johanet C, Homberg JC: Antimitochondrial antibodies in the antiphospholipid syndrome. Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology. 1995, 13: 57-65. 10.1007/BF02772249.View Article
      15. Monti G, Galli M, Invernizzi F, Pioltelli P, Saccardo F, Monteverde A, Pietrogrande M, Renoldi P, Bombardieri S, Bordin G: Cryoglobulinaemias: a multi-centre study of the early clinical and laboratory manifestations of primary and secondary disease. GISC. Italian Group for the Study of Cryoglobulinaemias. Qjm. 1995, 88: 115-126.PubMed
      16. Shero JH, Bordwell B, Rothfield NF, Earnshaw WC: High titers of autoantibodies to topoisomerase I (Scl-70) in sera from scleroderma patients. Science. 4739, 231: 737-740.View Article
      17. al-Awami M, Schillinger M, Maca T, Gschwandtner M, Bieglmayer C, Wagner O, Minar E: Homocysteine levels in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon. Vasa. 2002, 31: 87-90. 10.1024/0301-1526.31.2.87.View ArticlePubMed
      18. Cooke JP, Marshall JM: Mechanisms of Raynaud's disease. Vascular Medicine. 2005, 10: 293-307. 10.1191/1358863x05vm639ra.View ArticlePubMed
      19. Herrick AL, Illingworth K, Blann A, Hay CR, Hollis S, Jayson MI: Von Willebrand factor, thrombomodulin, thromboxane, beta-thromboglobulin and markers of fibrinolysis in primary Raynaud's phenomenon and systemic sclerosis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 1996, 55: 122-127. 10.1136/ard.55.2.122.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
      20. Pistorius MA, Planchon B, Schott JJ, Lemarec H: Heredity and genetic aspects of Raynaud's disease. Journal des Maladies Vasculaires. 2006, 31: 10-15.View ArticlePubMed
      21. Rychlik-Golema W, Mastej K, Adamiec R: The role of endothelin-1 and selected cytokines in the pathogenesis of Raynaud's phenomenon associated with systemic connective tissue diseases. International Angiology. 2006, 25: 221-227.PubMed
      22. Czupryniak A, Kaluzynska A, Nowicki M, Wiecek B, Bald E, Owczarek D: Raynaud's phenomenon and endothelial dysfunction in end-stage renal disease patients treated with hemodialysis. Kidney & Blood Pressure Research. 2005, 28: 27-31. 10.1159/000081059.View Article
      23. Lazzerini PE, Capecchi PL, Bisogno S, Cozzalupi M, Rossi PC, Pasini FL: Homocysteine and Raynaud's phenomenon: a review. Autoimmunity Reviews. 2010, 9: 181-187. 10.1016/j.autrev.2009.08.004.View ArticlePubMed
      24. LeRoy EC, Medsger TA: Raynaud's phenomenon: a proposal for classification. Clinical & Experimental Rheumatology. 1992, 10: 485-488.
      25. Harel L, Straussberg R, Rudich H, Cohen AH, Amir J: Raynaud's phenomenon as a manifestation of parvovirus B19 infection: case reports and review of parvovirus B19 rheumatic and vasculitic syndromes. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2000, 30: 500-503. 10.1086/313712.View ArticlePubMed
      26. Toumbis-Ioannou E, Cohen PR: Chemotherapy-induced Raynaud's phenomenon. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 1994, 61: 195-199.View ArticlePubMed
      27. Kruit WH, Eggermont AM, Stoter G: Interferon-alpha induced Raynaud's syndrome. Annals of Oncology. 2000, 11: 1501-1502. 10.1023/A:1026586629166.View ArticlePubMed
      28. Kallenberg CG: Raynaud's phenomenon as an early sign of connective tissue diseases. Vasa Supplementum. 1992, 34: 25-28.PubMed
      29. Sayre JW: Raynaud's disease presenting in a 5-month-old-male infant. Pediatrics. 1973, 52: 412-415.PubMed
      30. Cutolo M, Sulli A, Secchi ME, Paolino S, Pizzorni C: Nailfold capillaroscopy is useful for the diagnosis and follow-up of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. A future tool for the analysis of microvascular heart involvement?. Rheumatology. 2006, 45 (Suppl 4): iv43-46.PubMed
      31. Planchon B, Pistorius MA, Beurrier P, De Faucal P: Primary Raynaud's phenomenon. Age of onset and pathogenesis in a prospective study of 424 patients. Angiology. 1994, 45: 677-686. 10.1177/000331979404500802.View ArticlePubMed
      32. Meli M, Gitzelmann G, Koppensteiner R, Amann-Vesti BR: Predictive value of nailfold capillaroscopy in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon. Clinical Rheumatology. 2006, 25: 153-158. 10.1007/s10067-005-1146-1.View ArticlePubMed
      33. Allen E, Brown G: Raynaud's disease: A critical review of minimal requisites for diagnosis. Am J Med Sci. 1932, 183-187.
      34. Herrick AL: Pathogenesis of Raynaud's phenomenon. Rheumatology. 2005, 44: 587-596. 10.1093/rheumatology/keh552.View ArticlePubMed
      35. Duffy CM, Laxer RM, Lee P, Ramsay C, Fritzler M, Silverman ED: Raynaud syndrome in childhood. Journal of Pediatrics. 1989, 114: 73-78. 10.1016/S0022-3476(89)80604-3.View ArticlePubMed
      36. Singsen BH, Kornreich HK, Koster-King K, Brink SJ, Bernstein BH, Hanson V, Tan EM: Mixed connective tissue disease in children. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 1977, 20: 355-360.
      37. Walker ID: Thrombophilia in pregnancy. J Clin Pathol. 2000, 53 (8): 573-80. 10.1136/jcp.53.8.573.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
      38. Calhoon MJ, Ross CN, Pounder E, Cassidy D, Manco-Johnson MJ, Goldenberg NA: High prevalence of thrombophilic traits in children with family history of thromboembolism. Journal of Pediatrics. 2010, 157: 485-489. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.03.031.View ArticlePubMed
      39. Carmel R, Green R, Rosenblatt DS, Watkins D: Update on cobalamin, folate, and homocysteine. Hematology. 2003
      40. Virdis A, Iglarz M, Neves MF, Amiri F, Touyz RM, Rozen R, Schiffrin EL: Effect of hyperhomocystinemia and hypertension on endothelial function in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase-deficient mice. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis & Vascular Biology. 2003, 23: 1352-1357. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000083297.47245.DA.View Article
      41. Tawakol A, Forgione MA, Stuehlinger M, Alpert NM, Cooke JP, Loscalzo J, Fischman AJ, Creager MA, Gewirtz H: Homocysteine impairs coronary microvascular dilator function in humans. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2002, 40: 1051-1058. 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02069-7.View ArticlePubMed
      42. Cheng T-T, Chiu C-K: Elevated homocysteine levels in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus. Clinical Rheumatology. 2002, 21: 251-254. 10.1007/s10067-002-8291-6.View ArticlePubMed
      43. Kingma K, Wollersheim H, Thien T: Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of intravenous prostacyclin on hemodynamics in severe Raynaud's phenomenon: the acute vasodilatory effect is not sustained. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology. 1995, 26: 388-393. 10.1097/00005344-199509000-00007.View ArticlePubMed
      44. Vinjar B, Stewart M: Oral vasodilators for primary Raynaud's phenomenon. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2008, CD006687-
      45. van der Meer J, Wouda AA, Kallenberg CG, Wesseling H: A double-blind controlled trial of low dose acetylsalicylic acid and dipyridamole in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon. Vasa - Supplementum. 1987, 18: 71-75.PubMed
      46. Denton CP, Howell K, Stratton RJ, Black CM: Long-term low molecular weight heparin therapy for severe Raynaud's phenomenon: a pilot study. Clinical & Experimental Rheumatology. 2000, 18: 499-502.
      47. Ortensi A, Salsano F, Trinchi S, D'Orazi V, Pisarri S: Microsurgical distal sympathectomy in chronic vasospastic syndromes of the hand. International Surgery. 2005, 90: 88-92.PubMed
      48. Belch JJ, Ho M: Pharmacotherapy of Raynaud's phenomenon. Drugs. 1996, 52: 682-695. 10.2165/00003495-199652050-00006.View ArticlePubMed
      49. Schiopu E, Hsu VM, Impens AJ, Rothman JA, McCloskey DA, Wilson JE, Phillips K, Seibold JR: Randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial of tadalafil in Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis. Journal of Rheumatology. 2009, 36: 2264-2268. 10.3899/jrheum.090270.View ArticlePubMed

      Copyright

      © Sharathkumar and Castillo-Caro; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

      This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.